Eligibility Rules, Okay

[co. down green]

So thats a former England u21 international in nets (Camp) - A defence consisting of a former Scotland u21 international (McPake), an full Ireland international(Bruce) and & former England u16 international (Dudgeon).

A former England u17 international in midfield (Norwood) & lads born in stoke & Solihull up front.

Wonder will that put an end to their false sense of victimhood on the eligibility issue?

[BonnieShels]

So thats a former England u21 international in nets (Camp) - A defence consisting of a former Scotland u21 international (McPake), an full Ireland international(Bruce) and & former England u16 international (Dudgeon).

A former England u17 international in midfield (Norwood) & lads born in stoke & Solihull up front.

Wonder will that put an end to their false sense of victimhood on the eligibility issue?

Eh... I doubt it.

They still need to get someone born in Finchley.

[DannyInvincible]

So thats a former England u21 international in nets (Camp) - A defence consisting of a former Scotland u21 international (McPake), an full Ireland international(Bruce) and & former England u16 international (Dudgeon).

A former England u17 international in midfield (Norwood) & lads born in stoke & Solihull up front.

Wonder will that put an end to their false sense of victimhood on the eligibility issue?

I see EG on OWC claiming it's different in principle because the IFA are calling up "rejects", but when was it ever made clear that, for the entire remainder of their careers, Lee Camp and Alex Bruce would no longer be part of the respective plans of the FA and FAI?

[ifk101]

So thats a former England u21 international in nets (Camp) ....

deCamp?

[co. down green]

I see EG on OWC claiming it's different in principle because the IFA are calling up "rejects", but when was it ever made clear that, for the entire remainder of their careers, Lee Camp and Alex Bruce would no longer be part of the respective plans of the FA and FAI?

Good old EG, he's sorely missed!

McPake's a good example, he said the following in a Daily Record interview a week before declaring for the north - "I would hope to be knocking on the international (Scottish)door again although the manager has got his centre-halves and a settled squad, but you never know. I got close before so there's no reason why I can't get close again."


deCamp?

Didn't realise that Camp had de-camped himself from their squad to concentrate on his club football.

[Not Brazil]

Will NB be boycotting this game then?

Unfortunately, I'm all paid up for this one Danny - I'll wait and see if Bruce pulls out of the squad (which I think he might), before deciding if I attend the game. The ticket was only £8, so I'll take the hit on that if Bruce travels to Portugal.

Very disappointed with O'Neill, to say the least.

[geysir]

I'd say it's O'Neill's job is to pick the best squad from the available players, it's not his job to apply (his subjective or succumb to others' subjective) judgments on some players, over and above what he applies to other players. Once a player is qualified to play, then it should come down to what matters to the manager, namely football ability, attitude etc.

O'Neill is probably desperate for NI to rake up a few victories in this group, realistically they will be doing well to finish a close 5th.

[osarusan]

but when was it ever made clear that, for the entire remainder of their careers, Lee Camp and Alex Bruce would no longer be part of the respective plans of the FA and FAI?

How many times has it happened in the history of international football that it is made clear to players that for the rest of their careers they would no longer be part of the plans of their respective football associations?

[Gather round]

I'd say it's O'Neill's job is to pick the best squad from the available players, it's not his job to apply (his subjective or succumb to others' subjective) judgments on some players, over and above what he applies to other players. Once a player is qualified to play, then it should come down to what matters to the manager, namely football ability, attitude etc.

Would you still think that if, say, Manchester United and the players' agents were to arrange a swap deal that brought Terry and Suarez to the club in exchange for Evra and Ferdinand?

Surely the player's attitude is something that the coach makes a subjective judgement on?


O'Neill is probably desperate for NI to rake up a few victories in this group, realistically they will be doing well to finish a close 5th

If we hit Xmas with one or two points I think there's a good chance he'll walk. On the other hand, I'm feeling surprisingly optimistic. On the basis of September's games we could finish anywhere between sixth and third.

[geysir]

Would you still think that if, say, Manchester United and the players' agents were to arrange a swap deal that brought Terry and Suarez to the club in exchange for Evra and Ferdinand?
Surely the player's attitude is something that the coach makes a subjective judgement on?

What's your point? My point was that the manager (in international football) applies the same criteria for every available player as to how they would fit into the team. Of course he applies his judgements, otherwise how on earth is a manager to decide anything? His job is to pick the best squad from the available players and blend them into a team that functions. That's where he is judged.
There's a wide variety of opinion over what eligible players are good Northern Irelanders. If you want a team solely built around players born in the NI, then put that in the manager's contract. If you have a hierarchy of what constitutes a good Northern Irelander then put that into his contract,
A player with a NI parent is > one NI born grandparent but < 2 NI born parents. Every eligibility criteria is > than one who chose to play for the FAI over and above the IFA, but a NI born who chose to play for the FAI and then returned to the IFA is > than a player who wasn't born in NI, who had first chosen to play for the FAI.

[Gather round]

What's your point? My point was that the manager (in international football) applies the same criteria for every available player

I understood your point and in reply asked a straightforward if hypothetical question which you've ignored.

My point is simple enough. O'Neill picking the one eligible player most likely to anger much of the support is a bad decision- I agree with NB above. Bad for O'Neill, as now probably anything less than a win in Porto* will increase the criticism of him from fans, bad for team spirit on and off the pitch and probably bad for Bruce. He'll likely get dragged into a wider NI row that most Hull City stalwarts don't have to cope with during their football careers.

* Not achieved away against a top two seed since WC 1986.

[Sullivinho]

It's amazing what people throw out. The IFA's initiative has led them to finding a perfectly good CB. It doesn't even look like it was used that much.

[geysir]

I understood your point and in reply asked a straightforward if hypothetical question which you've ignored.

Ignored because it was irrelevant and absurdly hypothetical. And I'm pleased you could make your point..... finally.


I agree with NB above. Bad for O'Neill, as now probably anything less than a win in Porto* will increase the criticism of him from fans, bad for team spirit on and off the pitch and probably bad for Bruce. He'll likely get dragged into a wider NI row that most Hull City stalwarts don't have to cope with during their football careers.
A win in Porto? ;)
So to venture (again) into the absurdly hypothetical - namely a win in Porto, would appease the (some or many) fans criticism for calling up Bruce to the squad. That would appease the ideologues who cling to the hierarchal value of the criteria to be a Northern Irelander, - Michael O'Connor is kosher, Bruce bad.
I can understand why O'Neill doesn't buy into that nonsense.

[Gather round]

And I'm pleased you could make your point..... finalley


No problem. I'm patient with slow learners.

Enjoy the rest of the campaign.

[SwanVsDalton]

I can see why NI fans would apply the hierarchy, no matter how churlish it might appear - Bruce said some things which in hindsight appear a bit silly. And I apply a similar hierarchy for Irish players (Stephen Ireland <<<<<<<< any other ROI eligible footballer).

However if Ireland were to come back to the ROI squad I'd swallow it if he proved an asset for the team and on the pitch. NI are short of options, and I can see why O'Neill made the call.

I'm not going to venture on to OWC to answer this (never again), but anyone care to offer a flavour of NI fans general feelings on the Bruce call up?

[Sullivinho]

I'm not going to venture on to OWC to answer this (never again), buy anyone care to offer a flavour of NI fans general feelings on the Bruce call up?

http://ourweecountry.ipbhost.com/public/style_emoticons/default/drinks.gif

[Not Brazil]

I'm not going to venture on to OWC to answer this (never again), but anyone care to offer a flavour of NI fans general feelings on the Bruce call up?

If he comes on in Porto, you'll be left in no doubt as to NI fans general feelings on the issue - I think he'll withdraw from the squad anyway - taken off injured on Tuesday, and missing from the Hull team today.

[boovidge]

I don't get the logic. You happily accept the scraps from the English table but not scraps off us? Either you only accept players that have NI as their first choice or you don't. Bruce probably feels as Northern Irish as Lee Camp but you welcomed him with open arms.

[gastric]

I don't get the logic. You happily accept the scraps from the English table but not scraps off us? Either you only accept players that have NI as their first choice or you don't. Bruce probably feels as Northern Irish as Lee Camp but you welcomed him with open arms.

No doubt there is politics involved in their views, but also there is a perverse ethical argument that seems to cover up the hypocrisy of the situation. I agree with both you and Geysir, and God help us, how can O' Neill be expected to be deemed a good manager while working in an environment where idealism is seen to be more important than success on the field.

[DannyInvincible]

How many times has it happened in the history of international football that it is made clear to players that for the rest of their careers they would no longer be part of the plans of their respective football associations?

Very rarely, if ever, I would imagine. What's your point?

[DannyInvincible]

I'm not going to venture on to OWC to answer this (never again), but anyone care to offer a flavour of NI fans general feelings on the Bruce call up?

There's general disappointment, anger and embarrassment, and then there's EG reassuring those concerned that this is different in principle.

[Charlie Darwin]

Anybody with any knowledge of Mick O'Neill would have foreseen he'd take a very practical approach to eligibility criteria. He's always said he thinks everyone born in NI should play for NI, but he always said he only wanted players who were committed to do so. If Bruce is committed to NI, fine, but I can see exactly why fans would be disgusted since he's clearly got no allegiance to either Irish side.


I understood your point and in reply asked a straightforward if hypothetical question which you've ignored.

My point is simple enough. O'Neill picking the one eligible player most likely to anger much of the support is a bad decision- I agree with NB above. Bad for O'Neill, as now probably anything less than a win in Porto* will increase the criticism of him from fans, bad for team spirit on and off the pitch and probably bad for Bruce. He'll likely get dragged into a wider NI row that most Hull City stalwarts don't have to cope with during their football careers.

* Not achieved away against a top two seed since WC 1986.
How much is much though? Most of the support, or just the diehards? I'm not nitpicking, I'm genuinely interested.


I can see why NI fans would apply the hierarchy, no matter how churlish it might appear - Bruce said some things which in hindsight appear a bit silly. And I apply a similar hierarchy for Irish players (Stephen Ireland <<<<<<<< any other ROI eligible footballer).
Personally I'd have more time for Stephen Ireland than somebody who pulls on the green shirt to pad their CV. At least he's not taking an honour from somebody who would really treasure it.

[DannyInvincible]

How much is much though? Most of the support, or just the diehards? I'm not nitpicking, I'm genuinely interested.

And wouldn't a manager subjecting his squad decisions to the opinions of the fickle mob be rather worrying? Do you think fans ought to have a say in squad selections, GR?

[boovidge]

Anybody with any knowledge of Mick O'Neill would have foreseen he'd take a very practical approach to eligibility criteria. He's always said he thinks everyone born in NI should play for NI, but he always said he only wanted players who were committed to do so. If Bruce is committed to NI, fine, but I can see exactly why fans would be disgusted since he's clearly got no allegiance to either Irish side.


How much is much though? Most of the support, or just the diehards? I'm not nitpicking, I'm genuinely interested.


Personally I'd have more time for Stephen Ireland than somebody who pulls on the green shirt to pad their CV. At least he's not taking an honour from somebody who would really treasure it.

If Stephen Ireland, for example, only grudgingly played international football then he would be taking the honour from someone more worthy. It doesn't make any difference that he was born in Ireland.

[Charlie Darwin]

But he's not grudgingly playing. He's said "I don't want to play" and that's it. If he decides to come back, great - it'll be because he's decided that representing his country means something to him.

I respect that more than some careerist like Mark Noble or Jermaine Pennant showing up and playing like a professional with no regard for the honour of wearing the shirt. I'd rather Paul McShane show up and do a worse job but with 100% heart, because you know there's no player for whom it means more to wear the shirt. I know we've had plenty like that in the past and so have Norn Iron, so I can see why it irks the supporters that somebody like Bruce would do it so flagrantly.

It must be even more annoying when it's a player as poor as Alex Bruce.

[osarusan]

Very rarely, if ever, I would imagine. What's your point?

You are the one who mentioned the lack of some kind of notice that they had no future with the association as if it had some kind of meaning.

Bruce and Camp (and many others in this and other countries) have looked at their lack on involvement with the national teams (ROI and England), have looked at the number and quality of players which are ahead of them in the pecking order, and have come to the conclusion that they had only a very remote chance of a future in the national team. They were fortunate enough to have a back-up option due to citizenship, though Bruce has already burned that bridge in some fans' eyes.

The is clearly different from some of the players who've declared for the ROI who were obviously going to be involved with NI at international level.

In my opinion, the best counter-argument to the claims of poaching would be to find a player who declared for NI after underage training/caps for another association that still considered the player a valuable player at senior level.

[gastric]

But he's not grudgingly playing. He's said "I don't want to play" and that's it. If he decides to come back, great - it'll be because he's decided that representing his country means something to him.

I respect that more than some careerist like Mark Noble or Jermaine Pennant showing up and playing like a professional with no regard for the honour of wearing the shirt. I'd rather Paul McShane show up and do a worse job but with 100% heart, because you know there's no player for whom it means more to wear the shirt. I know we've had plenty like that in the past and so have Norn Iron, so I can see why it irks the supporters that somebody like Bruce would do it so flagrantly.

It must be even more annoying when it's a player as poor as Alex Bruce.

Charlie, I am aware of your strong opinion on this subject from other discussions with you! But out of interest, isn't success the objective of all managers and what ultimately we demand of them?Therefore, should picking the best players regardless of background or history be accepted? When the players are out on the ground, don't we support them 100%? I am genuinely interested in your opinion on this.

[geysir]

I'd guess at this stage of his career and ability, if Bruce did get a NI cap, he would feel honoured by the award :)
I'd have little doubt that O'Neill has talked to the player and sussed him out. I don't know what NI's needs are now at central defense, but O'Neill is a smart enough guy to take on board other views and measure them up to the needs of the team to have some back-up.
Obviously O'Neill doesn't inherit old backward grudges which don't resonate with a man of his intelligence. Like any sound manager, he takes over the job and approaches all available 'talent' with a fresh approach. Similar in a way when Kerr invited Roy Keane back, whatever happened previous was not the concern of Kerr. Bruce is an available player, just like any other available player.

[ArdeeBhoy]

On the basis of certain posters, the point from 2 days ago still stands.

Though to be fair to NB, at least he's being consistent. Unlike his rotund colleague who'll say pretty much anything that suits, not least in person...
;)

[DannyInvincible]

I don't get the logic. You happily accept the scraps from the English table but not scraps off us? Either you only accept players that have NI as their first choice or you don't. Bruce probably feels as Northern Irish as Lee Camp but you welcomed him with open arms.

And why distinguish Bruce from the likes of Ryan Brobbel, Johnny Gorman, Tony Kane or Michael O'Connor who similarly participated in FAI set-ups before playing for NI without their broad support taking any issue with it? Is it just that Bruce is of a higher profile and happened to play for us at senior level? Is it because he expressly shunned NI when offered the opportunity to play for them in the past? Didn't O'Connor implicitly shun NI when he opted to play for the FAI before returning to the IFA for careerist reasons after concluding that an international future with the FAI would be unlikely? Why is his path deemed acceptable but Bruce's not?

[DannyInvincible]

You are the one who mentioned the lack of some kind of notice that they had no future with the association as if it had some kind of meaning.

It means that nobody can ever say with any certainty whatsoever that one player is an international reject or no-hoper whilst another has a long, certain and fruitful international career in front of him with a particular association.

Say, Keith Andrews had a second nationality, would it have been fair to cast him as an FAI no-hoper and "fair game" for another association at the age of 26? Evidently not; since the age of 27/28 he's become an integral part of our midfield. Theoretically-speaking, for whatever reason, be it due to a late development spurt on the part of Bruce, a shortage of other worthy centre-backs or a spate of injuries to defensive regulars, who's to know how useful Bruce might have become for us at some point in the future?


Bruce and Camp (and many others in this and other countries) have looked at their lack on involvement with the national teams (ROI and England), have looked at the number and quality of players which are ahead of them in the pecking order, and have come to the conclusion that they had only a very remote chance of a future in the national team. They were fortunate enough to have a back-up option due to citizenship, though Bruce has already burned that bridge in some fans' eyes.

The players came to such conclusions themselves, which is entirely their entitlement if they wish to weigh up their options. Their associations never indicated to them that they would be forever more surplus to the association's requirements, however. The argument looks at the issue from the persepctive of the associations' intentions. It goes that the FAI are "poaching" players wanted by another association whilst the IFA operate on a different principle. That argument doesn't stand as the likes of Bruce would always have been a viable option for us had he not declared for the IFA. The IFA don't operate on a different principle besides.


The is clearly different from some of the players who've declared for the ROI who were obviously going to be involved with NI at international level.

Only if the players were willing to do so. Marc Wilson said he'd either play for us or no-one, for example.


In my opinion, the best counter-argument to the claims of poaching would be to find a player who declared for NI after underage training/caps for another association who still considered the player a valuable player at senior level.

So, do you believe it is different in principle then? As if the IFA would have any qualms with selecting a player in whom a second association was also interested. They'd act to serve their own interests just like how any professional association would operate. Sure, wasn't Gerry Armstrong chasing after England under-21 international and senior hopeful Connor Wickham only a few months ago? You think NI fans would object to Wickham switching to the IFA despite the FA's obvious interest in the lad? :rolleyes:

[osarusan]

Say........ Theoretically-speaking............. who's to know............


We've had this debate before - while NI can point to a number of players whose immediate value to their team is obvious, on the other side there's nothing but 'who knows?'.



The players came to such conclusions themselves, which is entirely their entitlement if they wish to weigh up their options.
Indeed, and I'd say they didn't come to such conclusions lightly.



Their associations never indicated to them that they would be forever more surplus to the association's requirements, however.
Because, as you've admitted, it never ever happens. But you keep mentioning it has like it some meaning.



So, do you believe it is different in principle then?
I wouldn't use the word principle in any situation where Alex Bruce is being discussed. But, as I've indicated earlier, I think that arguing that NI being happy to take Lee Camp while complaining about ROI 'poaching' is evidence of hypocrisy is missing the point.



Sure, wasn't Gerry Armstrong chasing after England under-21 international and senior hopeful Connor Wickham only a few months ago? You think NI fans would object to Wickham switching to the IFA despite the FA's obvious interest in the lad?
I haven't followed that story at all, but if what you say it true (and I've no reason to doubt you), then I'd say it's a far more relevant piece of evidence of NI hypocrisy than Lee Camp.

[ifk101]

In my opinion, the best counter-argument to the claims of poaching would be to find a player who declared for NI after underage training/caps for another association that still considered the player a valuable player at senior level.

Not senior level but nonetheless ..


The pair have represented Northern Ireland at both under-19 and under-21 level over the last 18 months and manager Steve Beaglehole has issued a strong ‘hands-off’ warning to the English.
“England have gone after Oliver Norwood trying to get him back and they’ve approached Lee Hodson looking for him to play for them as well,” revealed Beaglehole. “When we found out Norwood was eligible for us we were told that he hadn’t particularly enjoyed his experience with England, so we made our approach.
“Lee Hodson has never been involved with any England squad at any age. He’s been ignored and has been very proud to play for Northern Ireland.
“Both lads have come and played for us, been made to feel very welcome and have enjoyed it.
“It’s only now that England are looking for them after seeing that they are very capable players at international level.”
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/local/back-off-our-players-ifa-warn-english-14748583.html

[osarusan]

Not senior level but nonetheless ..


http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/local/back-off-our-players-ifa-warn-english-14748583.html

Even the bit you've quoted says that Hodson never played at England at any level, so I don't think he meets the criteria for the kind of example I was talking about.

In Norwood's case, did he come to the conclusion that he had no future with England (at senior level at least) which convinced him to look to his chances with NI? Seems like there was about 19 months between his last underage England cap and his first NI underage cap - for how many matches was he overlooked in the meantime, and behind how many different other goalkeepers? Or was he 'convinced' by NI? I don't know enough about him and the circumstances of his switch, but he might be an example of NI hypocrisy.

[DannyInvincible]

Indeed, and I'd say they didn't come to such conclusions lightly.

I wouldn't doubt that, but is it relevant?


Because, as you've admitted, it never ever happens. But you keep mentioning it has like it some meaning.

Doesn't it mean that it is impossible to assume, as some NI fans like EG attempt to do, the future plans and intentions of an association with regard to any player, assuming he'd be willing and able to line out for them in the first place? Johnny Gorman participated in both the FAI's and IFA's set-ups within the same year, for example. Did he become a certain FAI reject and "fair game" for the IFA all of a sudden at some point during that short space of time?

[DannyInvincible]

Anton Rodgers and Sean Scannell are other players registered with the FAI whom IFA figures (Armstrong and O'Neill, respectively) have expressly declared an interest in pursuing and selecting. Scannell last lined out for our under-21s at the end of July, which was after O'Neill's interest in him first came to light, so there was no indication or reason to assume that the player was ever surplus to FAI requirements.

[osarusan]

I wouldn't doubt that, but is it relevant?

Doesn't it mean that it is impossible to assume, as some NI fans like EG attempt to do, the future plans and intentions of an association with regard to any player, assuming he'd be willing and able to line out for them in the first place?
It does, and if you want to hypothesise about the value of a player like Alex Bruce to Ireland or Lee Camp to England in the event of what would have to be an extraordinary sequence of injuries or other events making players unavailable for a particular game, I'll agree that, however unlikely, it is possible that ROI might be in dire need of Alex Bruce at some point in the future.

My point is that the players themselves have come to the conclusion that their future opportunities with the associations are so remote that they're effectively giving up and moving on to plan B. Therefore I think it is very relevant that they don't come to this conclusion lightly.

The switch of a player like Lee Camp (for example)with underage caps for England, which presumably happened after he came to the conclusion that England would never need him is different from the switch of a player like James McClean (for example) with underage caps for NI, who couldn't have come to that conclusion regarding his future with NI.

This is why I think the argument that the two are like for like and that NI are being hypocritical misses the point.


Anton Rodgers and Sean Scannell are other players registered with the FAI whom IFA figures (Armstrong and O'Neill, respectively) have expressly declared an interest in pursuing and selecting. Scannell last lined out for our under-21s at the end of July, which was after O'Neill's interest in him first came to light, so there was no indication or reason to assume that the player was ever surplus to FAI requirements.

Couldn't find out much about Rodgers, but Scannell has numerous and (as you point out) recent underage caps, so NI attempting to 'poach' him could be an example of the hypocrisy I talked about earlier, unless there is other information to take into consideration. Has anybody ever dared mention him on OWC or other message boards as an example of NI double standards, and if so what has the response been?

[ArdeeBhoy]

Don't see what your point is.

These and hundreds of players eligible for more than one international side, until they play a competitive game are always in the position where they can pick and choose.

[DannyInvincible]

Couldn't find out much about Rodgers, but Scannell has numerous and (as you point out) recent underage caps, so NI attempting to 'poach' him could be an example of the hypocrisy I talked about earlier, unless there is other information to take into consideration. Has anybody ever dared mention him on OWC or other message boards as an example of NI double standards, and if so what has the response been?

There was a thread on Scannell and his brother Damian urging O'Neill to call them up! (Granted, Damian Scannell has never played for us at any level, to the best of my knowledge.)

Some choice comments:


Its all about two things...

1) Increasing our player pool
2) Getting one over our Southern enemies

what harm can it do...

Alex Bruce same situation.


To be fair, it's more than a bit disingenuous for people to be talking about getting Sean Scannell to play for NI, whilst at the same time complaining about ROI poaching players capped at underage level by NI. When considered in the context of the approaches made to Jonny Gorman, Alex Bruce and Anton Rodgers, it doesn't leave NI with any moral highground.

I suspect the above post and others from the same poster (Terry) that raised some awkward questions for the regulars came from an account masquerading as a NI fan. No way of saying for sure, but either way, the same admin who dished out my eight-year ban was soon on the scene to inform him he was on a "fine line" before instigating a suspension:


Top tip: Next time you come on spent a bit more time posting on 'bland' subjects, 2 posts about the new kit wasn't really enough. The Irish Olympic team, GAA and digs at Rangers sort of gave it away.

See ya

Some others:


Scannell, Gorman, Bruce and Rodgers all qualify to play for Northern Ireland by the usual conventions that govern all other FIFA members bar one and are not discriminatory to other associations.

Gibson, McClean, O'Kane, Wilson etc do not.

This is where we (but maybe not you, Terence?) have the moral high ground


You're right, CAS did look at the current situation. They described it as unfair. That should tell you all you need to know about where the FAI stand in relation to the moral high ground.

And with these players listed above, which ROI team is being disrupted by approaching them?


I can definitely see where you are coming from Terry but I would see the difference between Duffy and Scannell being that Scannell is English and has not rejected his home association as Duffy has. I'm sure if England came knocking that Scannell wouldn't entertain the notion of playing for anyone else.

If the IFA were to approach a Southerner, one with a good chance of making the senior team, and persuade him to play for NI instead of ROI then accusations of hypocrisy would be valid.

But trying exploit the rules to secure the services of an Englishman is a different matter entirely.

Yet our selection of Adam Barton was an example of "poaching" from the IFA? :confused:


Approaching another countries current international players with promises full of lies is the problem. Poaching or stealing is its name and thats the difference between this and ROI's thieving game.


The only defector to start a competitive game for ROI is Gibson and even Trap knows hes rubbish and rarely plays him. ROI are approaching our young players filling their heads with false promises and lies, not to boost their squads but to steal them from NI and stop playing for us.



The difference is that ROI tap-up and approach another nations current players. NI considers players for selection that are not currently playing for their home nation, not to steal them from another association.

[DannyInvincible]

A piece on Worthington approaching Connor Wickham two years ago: http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Wickham-wanted-by-NI-article556215.html


Ipswich striker Connor Wickham has emerged as a target for Northern Ireland boss Nigel Worthington.

The 17-year-old is currently out of action with a foot injury and helped England Under-17 side to the European Championship crown this summer. But he qualifies for Northern Ireland through his father Stefan, and former Norwich manager Worthington is keen to secure his future at international level.

Worthington said: "The question has been asked about Connor Wickham. There's potential there. We have done our homework and offered him the opportunity to further his international career with Northern Ireland."

He added: "Hopefully, he will follow young Oliver Norwood from Manchester United and throw in his lot with a squad he can help go places."

OWC's thread on Wickham saw most contributors advocating any possible selection of Wickham whilst admitting that seeing him line out for NI was an unfortunate unlikelihood. Not one saw any potential hypocrisy in such a move.

[ifk101]

Leon Best is another example.

Read first post in his thread.

http://foot.ie/threads/83189-Leon-Best

[ArdeeBhoy]

Not sure why anyone is surprised.

Some of those people are seriously warped.

[DannyInvincible]

It does, and if you want to hypothesise about the value of a player like Alex Bruce to Ireland or Lee Camp to England in the event of what would have to be an extraordinary sequence of injuries or other events making players unavailable for a particular game, I'll agree that, however unlikely, it is possible that ROI might be in dire need of Alex Bruce at some point in the future.

My point is that the players themselves have come to the conclusion that their future opportunities with the associations are so remote that they're effectively giving up and moving on to plan B. Therefore I think it is very relevant that they don't come to this conclusion lightly.

The switch of a player like Lee Camp (for example)with underage caps for England, which presumably happened after he came to the conclusion that England would never need him is different from the switch of a player like James McClean (for example) with underage caps for NI, who couldn't have come to that conclusion regarding his future with NI.

This is why I think the argument that the two are like for like and that NI are being hypocritical misses the point.

Have been thinking a bit more about this. I acknowledge that McClean would have been of immediate utility or value to the IFA when he switched to the FAI - he was called into their senior squad to play the Faroes and then withdrew shortly before citing his interest in holding out for a call-up from the FAI - whereas there was no indication that Lee Camp was of immediate value to the FA when he opted to switch to the IFA, whatever about his potential future value to them (if the fact a player might be of immediate value even creates a moral distinction so long as he'd always have been an option for the association with whom he was originally registered), but, either way, what difference should that make with regard to the selection process of the FAI so long as McClean, like Camp, made a free decision as to his own international career path? Are you suggesting the FAI should have turned down McClean's advance and should ignore other players who may be interested in representing us simply because the IFA might have immediate or future plans for them? I would argue that there is no place for sentiment in the running of a professional international football association. There are rules in place and so long as they are adhered to, crying foul just sounds like playing the victim. And worse, for the IFA to be evidently engaged in the very same game about which they and their fans complain when it comes to FAI activity is downright hypocrisy.

[SwanVsDalton]

Personally I'd have more time for Stephen Ireland than somebody who pulls on the green shirt to pad their CV. At least he's not taking an honour from somebody who would really treasure it.

That's assuming Stephen Ireland ever really treasured it? Plenty of evidence to suggest he didn't. Point is most ROI eligible footballers appear prouder and more willing to represent us than [BonnieShels friendly edit] Stevie Manchester.

But I was exaggerating. I should've said 'Mark Noble/Jermaine Pennent < Stephen Ireland <<<<<<<<<<<<< any other ROI eligible footballer'. :)

[BonnieShels]

That's assuming Stephen Ireland ever really treasured it? Plenty of evidence to suggest he didn't. Point is most ROI eligible footballers appear prouder and more willing to represent us than Ireland.


That sentence nearly broke my brain.
Who else would "us" be SvD? :P
Be kind and edit that to contain the word Stephen lest you start a war.

[SwanVsDalton]

Consider your brain eased. I refuse to use the just the familiar 'Stephen' though and already said 'Stephen Ireland' in the par, so settled on a compromise...

[Bungle]

Does anybody have any update on Ryan McLaughlin?

[liamoo11]

Does anybody have any update on Ryan McLaughlin?

Playing well in next gen for pool. not in our 19s squad this week so has not switched yet although paperwork does take time i think

He is in the norths under 19s this week

[DannyInvincible]

Here's an update on Adam Hammill for anyone interested: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-19874062


A footballer has been arrested and bailed after a paramedic was allegedly assaulted in Liverpool city centre.

Adam Hammill, 24, was taken into custody after an incident on Temple Court in the early hours of Sunday.

Mr Hammill is a Wolverhampton Wanderers player but is currently on loan at Huddersfield Town.

Merseyside police said a man, 24, from Bootle, had been arrested on suspicion of common assault. He has been released on bail pending further inquiries.

[Olé Olé]

Playing well in next gen for pool. not in our 19s squad this week so has not switched yet although paperwork does take time i think

He is in the norths under 19s this week

I see McLaughlin's name bandied about on the forum a bit. Where's the indication that he actually does intend to play for Ireland? I've only seen the jubilant tweets after our qualification for Euro 2012.