Log in

View Full Version : Sean St. Ledger



Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Wolfie
25/08/2009, 12:22 PM
From a Preston fan I know:

"Everton after SSL to replace Lescott, £5mil I believe we are asking."

That would be a great move for St Ledger.

If Dunne is leaving City - Could it be a case of Dunne or St Ledger. Hardly both?

DmanDmythDledge
25/08/2009, 12:28 PM
If Dunne is leaving City - Could it be a case of Dunne or St Ledger. Hardly both?
Didn't Moyes rule out a bid for Dunne earlier in the summer? Villa are apparently after him anyway but Taylor and Distin have been strongly mentioned too.

Umberside
25/08/2009, 12:28 PM
That would be a great move for St Ledger.

If Dunne is leaving City - Could it be a case of Dunne or St Ledger. Hardly both?

Everton are a cash-strapped club and unless Dunne is involved as a swap in the deal for Lescott then it is unlikely.

St Ledger is the perfect type of David Moyes player - under-rated, not too expensive and a great work-rate. It's a win-win situation if he goes to Goodison.

Junior
25/08/2009, 2:21 PM
Everton are a cash-strapped club and unless Dunne is involved as a swap in the deal for Lescott then it is unlikely.

St Ledger is the perfect type of David Moyes player - under-rated, not too expensive and a great work-rate. It's a win-win situation if he goes to Goodison.

That doesnt make sense as Dunne would be no more expensive than SSL at £5m if the papers/posts on here are to be believed on the 2 players valuations?

Surely it would be down to whether Moyes rates Dunne above/below SSL as a signing?

tetsujin1979
25/08/2009, 2:23 PM
Everton are a cash-strapped club and unless Dunne is involved as a swap in the deal for Lescott then it is unlikely.

St Ledger is the perfect type of David Moyes player - under-rated, not too expensive and a great work-rate. It's a win-win situation if he goes to Goodison.
They're going to get 24million for Lescott, hardly going to be cash strapped after that?

Umberside
25/08/2009, 2:24 PM
That doesnt make sense as Dunne would be no more expensive than SSL at £5m if the papers/posts on here are to be believed on the 2 players valuations?

Surely it would be down to whether Moyes rates Dunne above/below SSL as a signing?

Because of Man City's poor defence Dunne is a valuable player and would certainly be worth more than £5 million.

DmanDmythDledge
25/08/2009, 2:28 PM
Because of Man City's poor defence Dunne is a valuable player and would certainly be worth more than £5 million.
Man City's defence is anything but poor.

Umberside
25/08/2009, 2:32 PM
Man City's defence is anything but poor.

Compared to the attack it is, and their vision is of being a top four team, the current defence wouldn't do at a top six team.

DmanDmythDledge
25/08/2009, 2:38 PM
Compared to the attack it is, and their vision is of being a top four team, the current defence wouldn't do at a top six team.
Comparing it to their attack has nothing to do with it.

Last season they conceded 2 less goals than Aston Villa, who finished 6th. City's defence was much improved in the second half of last season- they conceded 22 goals in 19 games, which I think is pretty good. Add the fact that they have improved their defence in the summer I think it is fine.

Umberside
25/08/2009, 2:43 PM
Comparing it to their attack has nothing to do with it.

What I'm saying is their attack would get them into the top four, their defence wouldn't.

DmanDmythDledge
25/08/2009, 2:44 PM
What I'm saying is their attack would get them into the top four, their defence wouldn't.
...which I've pointed out is irrelevant to the discussion. :)

Umberside
25/08/2009, 2:44 PM
...which I've pointed out is irrelevant to the discussion. :)

Okay :rolleyes: :)

tetsujin1979
25/08/2009, 3:17 PM
What I'm saying is their attack would get them into the top four, their defence wouldn't.
Bridge won the title twice with Chelsea
Toure's never finished outside the top four
Given's been the best keeper outside the top four teams for ages

Umberside
25/08/2009, 3:21 PM
Bridge won the title twice with Chelsea
Toure's never finished outside the top four
Given's been the best keeper outside the top four teams for ages

Bridge is past it
Toure plays at one of the biggest clubs in the world
Given is brilliant, he could get them into top four on his own :cool:

tetsujin1979
25/08/2009, 3:24 PM
My point is that City have bought defenders who can get them into the top four

Umberside
25/08/2009, 3:26 PM
My point is that City have bought defenders who can get them into the top four

A look at their defenders on the old reliable and I think they need one more top class defender to seriously challenge the top four.

Irish_Praha
25/08/2009, 3:34 PM
That doesnt make sense as Dunne would be no more expensive than SSL at £5m if the papers/posts on here are to be believed on the 2 players valuations?

Surely it would be down to whether Moyes rates Dunne above/below SSL as a signing?

SSL is a few years younger, which might influence his choice, if he is in fact considering them both.

Umberside
25/08/2009, 3:35 PM
SSL is a few years younger, which might influence his choice, if he is in fact considering them both.

I don't think he was ever interested in Dunne.

tetsujin1979
25/08/2009, 3:39 PM
Because of Man City's poor defence Dunne is a valuable player and would certainly be worth more than £5 million.
Only team in the Premier League yet to concede

Umberside
25/08/2009, 3:40 PM
Only team in the Premier League yet to concede

They'v done brilliantly to keep a clean sheet against Balckburn and Wolves :rolleyes:

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 3:44 PM
They'v done brilliantly to keep a clean sheet against Balckburn and Wolves :rolleyes:

They have, its the Premier league. Clean sheets are very difficult to grind out

Umberside
25/08/2009, 3:47 PM
They have, its the Premier league. Clean sheets are very difficult to grind out

How much pressure have they been under against Blackburn and Wolves? It's been pretty much attack for them in both games.

DmanDmythDledge
25/08/2009, 3:51 PM
How much pressure have they been under against Blackburn and Wolves? It's been pretty much attack for them in both games.
To further bring this thread off-topic: :)

Blackburn vs Man City
Possession: 46%-54%
Shots on target: 9-5
Shots off target: 8-3

Man City vs Wolves
Possession: 65%-35%
Shots on target: 11-2
Shots off target: 5-8

So the Blackburn game wasn't exactly the stroll in the park you are making it out to be.

Umberside
25/08/2009, 3:53 PM
To further bring this thread off-topic: :)

Blackburn vs Man City
Possession: 46%-54%
Shots on target: 9-5
Shots off target: 8-3

Man City vs Wolves
Possession: 65%-35%
Shots on target: 11-2
Shots off target: 5-8

So the Blackburn game wasn't exactly the stroll in the park you are making it out to be.

Don't know why this thread has changed into a Man City defence thread, considering St Ledger was never moving to Eastlands in the first place :rolleyes:

tetsujin1979
25/08/2009, 3:55 PM
How much pressure have they been under against Blackburn and Wolves? It's been pretty much attack for them in both games.
According to ESPN's stats section for those games
5 shots on target by Blackburn: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/gamecast?id=269768&page=stats&cc=5739
2 shots on target by Sunderland: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/gamecast?id=270065&page=stats&cc=5739

Umberside
25/08/2009, 3:57 PM
According to ESPN's stats section for those games
5 shots on target by Blackburn: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/gamecast?id=269768&page=stats&cc=5739
2 shots on target by Sunderland: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/gamecast?id=270065&page=stats&cc=5739

I can guarantee Sunderland have had no shots on target against Man City, simple because they haven't played them ;)

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 3:57 PM
Don't forget they needed a crossbar against Wolves, would have been great for Keogh if that had gone in btw

tetsujin1979
25/08/2009, 4:00 PM
I can guarantee Sunderland have had no shots on target against Man City, simple because they haven't played them ;)
sorry, Wolves

Umberside
25/08/2009, 4:01 PM
Don't forget they needed a crossbar against Wolves, would have been great for Keogh if that had gone in btw

That only proves the fragility of the Man City defence, which is what I've been talking about for the last half an hour with you lads :eek:

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 4:09 PM
That only proves the fragility of the Man City defence, which is what I've been talking about for the last half an hour with you lads :eek:

It proves that clean sheets are very difficult to grind out in the Premier league; which, as clearly evidenced by my posts, is all I am saying. Not only must you play well, you need a bit of luck too. Making it doubly difficult. I think their defense has played well, Toure and Dunne were excellent in my opinion against Andy Keogh, who looked a real handful. Doyle also took some containing when he came on.

Umberside
25/08/2009, 4:11 PM
It proves that clean sheets are very difficult to grind out in the Premier league; which, as clearly evidenced by my posts, is all I am saying. Not only must you play well, you need a bit of luck too. Making it doubly difficult. I think their defense has played well, Toure and Dunne were excellent in my opinion against Andy Keogh, who looked a real handful. Doyle also took some containing when he came on.

At the end of the day it's impossible to judge a defence when they've only played two teams destined for a relegation battle.

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 4:17 PM
At the end of the day it's impossible to judge a defence when they've only played two teams destined for a relegation battle.

Didn't stop you from judging them:


Because of Man City's poor defence Dunne is a valuable player and would certainly be worth more than £5 million.

Umberside
25/08/2009, 4:43 PM
Evidence that Man City have a poor defence is backed up by lasts season's woeful defence, whereas it's hard to say they've a good defence because they kept clean sheets against Blackburn and Wolves.

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 4:48 PM
Evidence that Man City have a poor defence is backed up by lasts season's woeful defence, whereas it's hard to say they've a good defence because they kept clean sheets against Blackburn and Wolves.

That "sentence" makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You've talked yourself into a corner, take your licks and jog on son

Umberside
25/08/2009, 4:50 PM
That "sentence" makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You've talked yourself into a corner, take your licks and jog on son

I agree I have talked myself down here, but the main point I was trying to make shouldn't be discarded.

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 4:58 PM
I agree I have talked myself down here, but the main point I was trying to make shouldn't be discarded.

Was your main point that Man City's defence is shaky enough to ensure they need Dunne?

As we both said, it is too early to make a judgment on their defence as a whole. Though I would agree that they need Dunne, but that is only because I rate Dunne. I reckon any club with Dunne on their books ought to keep, and play, him.

Umberside
25/08/2009, 5:02 PM
Was your main point that Man City's defence is shaky enough to ensure they need Dunne?

As we both said, it is too early to make a judgment on their defence as a whole. Though I would agree that they need Dunne, but that is only because I rate Dunne. I reckon any club with Dunne on their books ought to keep, and play, him.

Exactly what I meant :)

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 5:04 PM
Exactly what I meant :)

Good point

Umberside
25/08/2009, 5:09 PM
That "sentence" makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You've talked yourself into a corner, take your licks and jog on son

Just a matter of time before you get a thanks form DmanDmythDledge for that post ;)

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 5:12 PM
Just a matter of time before you get a thanks form DmanDmythDledge for that post ;)

Ah whatever I don't care, I just post what I think. On another note, why do you think Hughes is so keen to replace Dunne? I mean, is Lescott any better like? I dunno

Umberside
25/08/2009, 5:24 PM
On another note, why do you think Hughes is so keen to replace Dunne? I mean, is Lescott any better like? I dunno

I don't think he wants to replace him, he just wants more competition for the defence, like he has with the attack. When he's got that amount of money who could blame him.

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 5:36 PM
I don't think he wants to replace him, he just wants more competition for the defence, like he has with the attack. When he's got that amount of money who could blame him.

True that

Umberside
25/08/2009, 5:46 PM
If Dunne stays Man City have a good chance of challenging the top four but I can't see them actually staying in a Champions League place.

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 5:52 PM
I just hope the Saint stays away from Everton. They should be arrested for that jersey. You simply can't have a good season wearing that garb. The players look embarrassed while wearing it. It really is the ugliest soccer jersey I have ever seen

Umberside
25/08/2009, 5:58 PM
I just hope the Saint stays away from Everton. They should be arrested for that jersey. You simply can't have a good season wearing that garb. The players look embarrassed while wearing it. It really is the ugliest soccer jersey I have ever seen

Interestingly Everton have changed their home kit every year since 2001. Last year's was definitely the best one.

To be serious though Everton would be a good place for St Ledger.

Brendan 82
25/08/2009, 6:07 PM
To be serious though Everton would be a good place for St Ledger.

I'd agree if it were not for the shirt. I genuinely think it will have a very negative impact on the team this season

geysir
25/08/2009, 6:13 PM
True that

Have you been watching "The Wire"?

Umberside
25/08/2009, 6:13 PM
I'd agree if it were not for the shirt. I genuinely think it will have a very negative impact on the team this season

There are a lot of bad shirts this year and Everton's is one of the worst.

But it's likely St Ledger is one for the future (maybe next season) so hopefully the shirt will be gone by then :)

eirebhoy
25/08/2009, 6:46 PM
What I'm saying is their attack would get them into the top four, their defence wouldn't.
Their attack is no match for the top 4 imo.


Evidence that Man City have a poor defence is backed up by lasts season's woeful defence, whereas it's hard to say they've a good defence because they kept clean sheets against Blackburn and Wolves.
They hadn't got Toure last season or more importantly Gareth Barry who'll play the biggest role in improving their defensive record imo.

Anyway let's hope St Ledger makes the step up this summer.

Umberside
25/08/2009, 6:51 PM
Does anyone know what the transfer fee for St Ledger will be should a deal be made?