Cricket World Cup 2007

[Jerry The Saint]

SPANKED 'EM! :D

Much more important than the 2 points - full ODI ranking now. Let's get the big boys over. Croke Park is surely bigger than some of those pitches in the Caribbean:confused: ;)

[pete]

Great victory by some margin.

Best innings with the bat i've seen with Ireland. Bowling was solid but with the exception of Ashraful Bangladesh were very poor.

[Terry]

great result, anybody have a link to where I can see the table for the super 8's ?

[DmanDmythDledge]

great result, anybody have a link to where I can see the table for the super 8's ?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/tables/default.stm

[razor]

great result, anybody have a link to where I can see the table for the super 8's ?

here it is (http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/wc2007/content/current/site/wc/points.html)

[Jerry The Saint]

Just a whisker off 6th:)

2 heavyish defeats for the Windies and we could get there yet.:eek:

EDIT: Or it would be if they weren't playing Bangladesh (D'OH). Looks like we'll have to beat Sri Lanka so...

[pete]

Official ODI Teams (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-day_international)

It seems there are only 10 official ODI teams so it seems like a huge achievement for Ireland to become no.11

[geysir]

They were sucking pints after Ashraful was put out, a great achievement.
It's a wierd set up though with some players wanting to declare for England.

[pete]

It's a wierd set up though with some players wanting to declare for England.

With official ODI status maybe players won't be so quick to declare for England. The only difference would be if played Test cricket with England.

[DmanDmythDledge]

What do you have to do to become an ODI team?

[dfx-]

Beat two current full members in one year

[Aberdonian Stu]

Test cricket is still the big one though so I doubt it'd have that much impact.

[TheBoss]

Great performance !

We batted brilliantly and bowl hard when needed to, we were in control at the end and got the deserved victory.

I think if we can win some of games that are lined up during the year, the ICC might consider Test status.

[holidaysong]

Great result. The highlights are on BBC in just over 5 minutes.

[historynut]

C'mon everybody do the FUNKY CHICKEN !!!!!!!

[TheBoss]

Don't forget the Ferret ;)

[crc]

It seems there are only 10 official ODI teams so it seems like a huge achievement for Ireland to become no.11
Ireland are now the 12th ODI team. The others are the 10 test-nations and Kenya. Great result. I reckon it could have a similar (but much smaller) effect on Irish cricket to the what happened to footie after Euro '88 and Italia '90.

[Stuttgart88]

Stutts did you miss the zimbabwian thriller? he hit a 100+Yes, I was in France.

Saw the caption on telly last night, 115 against Zim and I realised the folly of my post!

[Aberdonian Stu]

Becoming the 12th ODI team is a huge plus, especially as we're beside England so will get plenty of games from tourists (which we already did but without the status so now they mean more to the tourists). Does it mean we automatically qualify for the World Cup in future?

[OwlsFan]

Ireland wanted that game more than Bangladesh. Very professional performance.

[shakermaker1982]

excellent performance. Bring on the Lankans!!!

[DaveyCakes]

That match showed the importance of doing the basics well...

Ireland mostly did, Bangladesh mostly didn't, and what looked to be a fairly even contest turned into a very comfortable win.

How bad was the Bangladeshi fielding? They missed about 4 simple runouts and gifted us god knows how many runs.

If I see any of the Ireland batsmen attempting a reverse sweep or any other such guff against Sri Lanka, I'll go over ther and smack him one...

[Sheridan]

I'm not sure where this notion that Ireland have attained permanent ODI status came from. The conferral of ODI status upon non-Test nations was abolished a few years ago. Ireland will appear in the full ODI rankings but their ODI status expires in 2009, along with that of all Associate qualifiers. They can regain it by qualifying for the next World Cup. Only two ODIs against Test nations are scheduled for the next year or so; a tri-series involving Ireland (hosts), the Netherlands and the West Indies this summer, and a single ODI against England in July 2008.

[pineapple stu]

I reckon it could have a similar (but much smaller) effect on Irish cricket to the what happened to footie after Euro '88 and Italia '90.
Don't think so, to be honest. I reckon what's happening with the cricket - and this thread is a good snap shot - is the typical Irish bandwagon jumping. Once the cricket is over, people will revert to apathy. Similar to Shels v Depor not really having any effect on the eL.

[Jerry The Saint]

I'm not sure where this notion that Ireland have attained permanent ODI status came from. The conferral of ODI status upon non-Test nations was abolished a few years ago. Ireland will appear in the full ODI rankings but their ODI status expires in 2009, along with that of all Associate qualifiers. They can regain it by qualifying for the next World Cup. Only two ODIs against Test nations are scheduled for the next year or so; a tri-series involving Ireland (hosts), the Netherlands and the West Indies this summer, and a single ODI against England in July 2008.

http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/wc2007/content/current/story/290685.html

It's the full ranking is the big step though, which the other qualifiers don't have. In theory, this should hopefully make it more attractive for nations touring England to play us:confused:

We should be in a better position geographically/economically than Zimbabwe or Kenya to take advantage of this. ICC may want to help us out by facilitating extra matches/funding due to the big spotlight on Ireland after the World Cup.


An Associate can be promoted when it has played at least ten one-day internationals and has beaten two Full Members, or has defeated one Full Member and won more than 60% of its games against other Associates.

Does this mean that if Ireland acheives this before 2009 we can roll our full-ODI status forward by another 2 years?

[Sheridan]

I don't think it makes any material difference at all. Ireland are eligible for this notional championship and will feature on official ranking lists, that's about it. Kenya were granted full ODI status after the 2003 World Cup (before the rules were changed) and couldn't get a game for years afterwards. The Future Tours Programme is set in stone until about 2012, so any future ODIs against Test nations will probably be on an ad hoc basis.

[Stuttgart88]

Similar to Shels v Depor not really having any effect on the eL.Very good analogy.

[pete]

I knew Ireland were in the WC & because its on Sky Sports did plan to watch it. I must admit my interest dropped when they started getting trashed as not much fun to watch.

I would have watched some of the Ashes to see England lose & more interest when Joyce started eventhough hes a judas. ;)

My brother is living in the UK & i think he caught the Ashes bug a few years ago & he would have actively followed the Ireland games both live in the pub & on the BBC website. Was playing cricket on the beach at the Easter weekend & must say was getting some interested looks - damn that bowling is harder than it looks. :p

[geysir]

Don't think so, to be honest. I reckon what's happening with the cricket - and this thread is a good snap shot - is the typical Irish bandwagon jumping. Once the cricket is over, people will revert to apathy. Similar to Shels v Depor not really having any effect on the eL.
That's a bit cynical, appropriate bandwagging has it's place :)
CRC referred to effect in proportion.
AFAIA, the Irish cricket set up got about $1/2m to prepare for this WC. The success so far will bring in extra cash. At a minimum the WC exploits are an unforgettable reward for the efforts of the team etc. I'd assume the cricket board will be able to use the cash generated and publicity to support their future plans.
It's just that I can't see how this team will be able to stay together with defecting being accepted as a normal career move and other players getting tied up with pro contracts.


damn that bowling is harder than it looks.
The pitch looks tiny on TV.
I've been practising in the garden for years slinging snowballs at an electicity pole about 15m away, at best (with a low wind factor) I might have a 50% bulls eye hit rate. That's just trying to hit the target.

[Jerry The Saint]

Aussies looking unstoppable - 7 wicket win, 7+ overs in hand.

Disappointingly, SL rested their big guns - making a farce of one of the potentially most exciting Super 8 games. Was hoping they'd be rested against us, their bowlers could destroy us. Maybe they still will although they will be determined not to finish 4th and avoid Aus until the final.

[TheBoss]

I think it is highly impossible that they will finish 4th with NRR been OK and then playing us.

[Sheridan]

Interesting footnote from the England-RSA game. All thirteen players currently on the field were born in South Africa.

[Dodge]

Lol :D

[Jerry The Saint]

Interesting footnote from the England-RSA game. All thirteen players currently on the field were born in South Africa.

They were breaking the South Africa race quota so KP had to go. :D

[Stuttgart88]

76-3.

Funny comment from BBC website:

Pietersen gets a laser stare from all 11 members of the South African side. In case you're unaware of the history behind this particular showdown, Pietersen left his homeland for England because of the quota system - South African rules state that no team can field more than three massive egos in any one match.

[Bluebeard]

39th Over, England are 124 for 8.

We managed 152 for 8 in 35 overs against the South Africans.

Heh, heh, heh.

[geysir]

Isn't it a disgrace that teams like England are allowed to compete in the last eights. It demeans the true meanings.

[Jerry The Saint]

All-out for 154 - possibility that this game has been rigged by the shady gambling syndicates? Can't see any other rational explanation for England's abysmal performance...





Well that's what some people say every time Ireland get a result so why not say it here:confused: :) :)

[kingdom hoop]

Pathetic from England. Well done!

[BobtheDrog]

reading ger siggins world cup diary on theicu.org he listed some of the groups that sent their congratulations to the irish team

"Some of the bodies that sent their congratulations and good wishes were the IRFU, Dublin City Council, Fingal Council, Bray Wanderers and the Special Olympics squad. An Post are particularly proud of their employee Kenny Carroll, who may have got the chance to discuss techniques with fellow postie Brad Hogg of Australia"

[TheBoss]

Can see RSA cruising to victory.

[Jerry The Saint]

SA 69/0 in the 7th Over.


At this same stage, England were 9 without loss.

:eek: :o

I actually wanted England to win at the start of the game but phook me, this is embarassing stuff. :D Got to be the worst defeat of the CWC, much moreso than us going down to Australia or some of the group stage cannon fodder games.

[dancinpants]

80-0 after 9 overs now :D

[DaveyCakes]

That, my friends, was a kicking.

[pete]

I cam home & just the start of the Setanta Cup game. I had not checked all day but flicked on to check the cricket score to see RSA 157-3 & hitting the winning shot. I had to to a double check on the time until I realised was 8.15pm.

:eek:

[TheBoss]

Imagine, there is a possibility we could end up ahead of England, but I think that is too optimistic.

Sri Lanks, by how much will they win by, the Irish Lads might had have a few drinks after the win v Bangla :D

[Stuttgart88]

Isn't it a disgrace that teams like England are allowed to compete in the last eights. It demeans the true meanings.
Brilliant.

I wonder what Michael Atherton thinks now.

[Jerry The Saint]

Sri Lanka win toss and BOWL.

Outside chance of the biggest upset yet:confused: S'Lanka have NOTHING to play for

[TheBoss]

We loose the toss again. I think we have won it, 2 or 3 times out 10.

[holidaysong]

Yeah, we've only won it twice.