Web Video Thread (DON'T QUOTE VIDS)

[dahamsta]

Nah, I still think it's terrible. I'd prefer to just see them humilated. Bring back stocks and rotten tomatoes.

[Ciaran W]

The worlds greatest freakout, im sure its been up before but its so funny :)

[the 12 th man]

Elderly couple (the man is 90) go into a Mayo clinic for a check up and.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RI-l0tK8Ok0

[the 12 th man]

Great goal celebration :D


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3w-5_jDV3EY

[SkStu]

worth clicking and watching.... at the bar with Roger Federer...

http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com/blogs/2010/06/at-the-bar-with-roger-federer/

[SkStu]

m8rxXamfh5c

[the 12 th man]

Definitely NSFW (language) but still :D



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEWxCdPHZhc

[strangeirish]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlM0ihe7IfA:D

[tetsujin1979]

Dancing on Haughey's grace. Literally, dancing on his grave
pifibs_q7ec

[Spudulika]

Corrupted the ideals of De Valera, a Fianna Fail that was once elegant - I think somebody needs to take some time in the funny farm.

[Mr A]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJaHHC95OPc

[the 12 th man]

Internal footage of a cruise liner in very rough seas,never say the B & I is rough
:D


http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=975_1283799588

[The Fly]

I must say I was unaware that the WWE had begun entering candidates for public office.

........Sweet Jesus! :laugh:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhV5RgcNJjE

(a stark raving mad candidate, for Stark County office.................only in America! ;) )

[bennocelt]

Wow, so did he get the vote then?

[Paddy Garcia]

No...

[the 12 th man]

Goalie celebrates a bit early :D


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIg6e-M_15E

[bennocelt]

if it was a shoot - out then its the ref who made the mistake!!!!!!!

[the 12 th man]

if it was a shoot - out then its the ref who made the mistake!!!!!!!

Don't think so,it's up to the ref to decide when the penalty has been completed,that was the keepers mistake.It was still the strikers first shot that spun in,just because the keeper got a touch doesn't mean the ball still can't go in.

[bennocelt]

Don't think so,it's up to the ref to decide when the penalty has been completed,that was the keepers mistake.It was still the strikers first shot that spun in,just because the keeper got a touch doesn't mean the ball still can't go in.

no, but the keeper pushed it forward, so no goal - thats the way it used to be in shoot outs anyway

[the 12 th man]

no, but the keeper pushed it forward, so no goal - thats the way it used to be in shoot outs anyway

bennocelt,don't want to take this anymore off topic but it's dealt with by a ref in the Rules of the game thread on Junior League.:ball:

http://foot.ie/threads/38755-Advice-on-the-Laws-of-the-Game?p=525301&viewfull=1#post525301

[bennocelt]

Thanks, thats an interesting thread, but I still think Im right!!! LOL A peno shootout is def different to a regular peno in 90 minutes, and those rules spouted by REf dont make any sense at all

[osarusan]

Face versus Watermelon video

I feel like Homer Simpson laughing at 'world's greatest sports injuries' and 'when buildings collapse', but damn, that was a funny video.

[the 12 th man]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3qj5AZ-Ut0

[TheBoss]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ8_tzOkB8A

[strangeirish]

Kind of like the Dáil ...

[pineapple stu]

Thanks, thats an interesting thread, but I still think Im right!!! LOL A peno shootout is def different to a regular peno in 90 minutes, and those rules spouted by REf dont make any sense at all
That was my understanding of it too, but from wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_shootout_(association_football)#Procedure) -


A decision in the 1986 World Cup led to the "Madrid rule" clarification of the penalty procedure. In the quarter-final shootout between Brazil and France, Bruno Bellone's kick rebounded out off the post and back into the goal off goalkeeper Carlos's back. Referee Ioan Igna gave the goal to France, and Brazil captain Edinho was booked for protesting that the kick should have been considered a miss as soon as it rebounded off the post. In 1987, the IFAB clarified Law 14, covering penalty kicks, to support Igna's decision
So the ref was correct to give a goal.

[bennocelt]

That was my understanding of it too, but from wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_shootout_(association_football)#Procedure) -


So the ref was correct to give a goal.

Cant really use wikipedia in an argument, please!
Actually read someone commented on this on yahoo that the keeper failed to stop the momentum of the ball so it should have stood - which seems like the best argument i have seen so far

[pineapple stu]

Well, no - when wikipedia links in the rules of the game, it's a better argument than a random punter on Yahoo.

[dahamsta]

+1. The "wikipedia can't be trusted" line is a nonsense, the vast majority of content on Wikipedia is good enough to be used as a non-academic reference. If you have an issue with the Wikipedia article, check the references and correct it instead of knocking people who actually made an effort.

Grow up for god's sake, your posts make you look like a cross between Jay and Neil in the Inbetweeners.

[strangeirish]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zJkdJ2I58o&feature=player_embedded

[poster]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrIp3k5pJQM&feature=player_embedded

Sorry if this is already up. C-lass.

[The Fly]

It has probably already been posted, but...............a classic deserves another viewing.

:rofl:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUS6nKpddec

[The Fly]

WOW!................. :hypnotized:

(Some competition for the seasonal fireworks display, methinks!)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IICGkOtJ9E

[The Fly]

You w**ker!......................:laugh:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57M3rKfYnpg

[The Fly]

I probably should have posted this video before the one above. ;)


(btw...understand that this is purely for educational purposes!)


http://www.vimeo.com/11673844

[TheBoss]

A guy loses it with Plank Kenny on The Fronline on RTE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FmVopEs9yI

Rap Version

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qWPKVFLJM8

[Dunny]

Afraid of heights?...


http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20100918/video/vod-amazing-video-of-workers-scaling-hug-dfc7e2c.html

[bennocelt]

wow thats amazing, and scary. Where was that?

[Dunny]

wow thats amazing, and scary. Where was that?

Some antenna in the US, higher than Sears Tower in Chicago!

[dahamsta]

I'd guess it's the CN Tower in Ontario.

[the 12 th man]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSMlIM9zLio

[The Fly]

That's just tooooo close!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHEgl0x1KzA

[sligoman]

9qaiIxo3qf8

[bennocelt]

I flagged that as animal abuse, horse whipped to run on tarmac, cruel

[Spudulika]

I had 2 thoughts watching that - one the same as you Bennocelt, the second being a bit more lighthearted - or actually shameful, this is posted on the internet, therefore the idiots can be all pulled in, Transits and all.

[The Fly]

What's that stereotype about women drivers again?.....................:laugh:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3heLzYKSGYI

[The Fly]

Stumble, little schimmy, fall...get up...stumble again, great schimmy, fall = :rofl:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvPkUMRE7yg

[dfx-]

+1. The "wikipedia can't be trusted" line is a nonsense, the vast majority of content on Wikipedia is good enough to be used as a non-academic reference. If you have an issue with the Wikipedia article, check the references and correct it instead of knocking people who actually made an effort.

Grow up for god's sake, your posts make you look like a cross between Jay and Neil in the Inbetweeners.

No, Wikipedia is generally used as a reference to a point. It shouldn't be a reference as much as ramblings on a forum should be. It can be used individually to read up on something further, but so can The Star.

I read in The Star that foot.ie is rubbish. Does that make it so?

I have experienced people giving wikipedia references in their PhD thesis..

[dahamsta]

Did you not actually understand my post dfx-? I really don't think you did.

[dfx-]

I'll check what Wikipedia says about understanding and get back to you..

Edit:


It is difficult to define understanding.

Sorry, I may not have. Or maybe I did. Wiki isn't sure :(