View Full Version : Republic of Ireland V Gibraltar(A) 4th Sept & Georgia(H) 7th Sept 2015 - Euro 2016 Q
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
[
8]
9
10
11
Olé Olé
07/09/2015, 9:59 PM
We look solid at the back. Clark was excellent. I think he's an ideal foil for O'Shea. The two full backs are immense. Constantly busy and are our most capable footballers, I think.
I thought Whelan was great again. He really pressed the Georgians. Did it in the first half and we should have reaped dividends in the second half but for Long's miss from a lovely McClean cross.
I thought the panel on RTE got a bit carried away with Long's contribution. His miss was poor and Walters finished a similar chance with more pressure from the defender. That miss summed up why he didn't start- goals win games (even if Robbie wasn't great in the first half).
Beautiful skill by Hendrick for Walters' goal. He looked more composed to me, even if he did drift in and out of the game. I think it was Liam Brady who stated it was his main contribution in an Irish jersey, forgetting he also assisted O'Shea's goal against Germany. He's got a bright future in the Ireland jersey and that he and Brady have become starters under MON is positive.
We needed that magic from Hendrick. We were very good in the second half and bright enough for the opening 30 minutes of the first half. There's just a lack of penetration in the final third on a consistent basis.
All I can do about the two yellows is laugh. Whelan got completely carried away with all the cursing and gesturing. McClean did what McClean does when he's dying to make an impact coming on. They'll miss the Germany game and both would have played a part but their misdemeanours were both moments of passion and it's tough for me to be disappointed in the face of that.
BonnieShels
07/09/2015, 9:59 PM
Him getting a yellow though could be a blessing. With him certainly out we have an opportunity to pick someone else in that role in a game (against Germany) that could make the campaign but will not break it. So Whelan can slot back in against Poland if AN Other fails to shine v Germany.
Stuttgart88
07/09/2015, 10:01 PM
Remember the debate a few months back about whether or not we play with fear? Semantics aside, this team is lacking the belief to just go out and play. I'd call it fear myself, but even if it's something else the team lacks a collective drive to impose its will on a game. Ok, we forced a win through grit and resolve but I just can't help thinking that more confidence would yield better performances.
Stuttgart88
07/09/2015, 10:03 PM
Thanks button not working. Well said Ole Ole though I think you saw more positives than I did.
BonnieShels
07/09/2015, 10:05 PM
Remember the debate a few months back about whether or not we play with fear? Semantics aside, this team is lacking the belief to just go out and play. I'd call it fear myself, but even if it's something else the team lacks a collective drive to I pose it's will on a game. Ok, we forced a win through grit and resolve but I just can't help thinking that more confidence would yield better performances.
It surely would. But we need to keep building on something. We consistently have one good result (draw v Germany) and then follow it up with a confidence draining one (v Scotland in Glasgow).
Avoiding defeat against Germany and who knows what team turns up against Poland.
Olé Olé
07/09/2015, 10:08 PM
Him getting a yellow though could be a blessing. With him certainly out we have an opportunity to pick someone else in that role in a game (against Germany) that could make the campaign but will not break it. So Whelan can slot back in against Poland if AN Other fails to shine v Germany.
Big time. Not to mention the rest he'll be afforded by missing the Germany game. He's not getting any younger and he'll see plenty minutes for Stoke between now and the Germany game. No harm to have him fresh as a daisy for the Poland match, given the short turnaround that weekend (Thurs-Sun).
That said, the short turnaround did him no harm this weekend.
back of the net
07/09/2015, 10:10 PM
Poland beating Scotland would be very nice, thank you. They will be well up for it though so who knows but cross that bridge when we come to it...
Even if them beating Scotland rules us out of qualifying automatically?
Albeit we would have to win in Poland for that to happen, but the pro with scotland been out of contention if Poland were to beat them
elroy
07/09/2015, 10:12 PM
I am sick to death about the negativity around this team. The RTE panel are a joke and over the top, writing the team off before the game and at half time. At full time, there is talk of beating Germany. It is full of contradictions and unfortunately your average joe public listens to these guys. Even the posts here around half time are way OTT.
Yes we are not brilliant, yes we don't play beautiful but we are doing alright in this group. We have an excellent chance to qualify now. We were never going to roll Georgia over, it wasn't that long ago that we scraped by them in Croker with a dodgey pen.
The one thing I do agree with the rte panel is that the team seem to lack belief. Despite playing well in the second half, we retreated into a shell thereafter instead of pushing on. But is it any wonder this team has no belief given public perception led by that rte panel.
osarusan
07/09/2015, 10:16 PM
I thought that Georgia were not anywhere near as good as the panel seemed to think. That scuffed shot in the 2nd half aside, Given's mis-control of a backpass was probably as good a chance as they had.
We just need to have a bit more belief in our own ability to impose our game on the opposition, rather than letting them impose their game on us.
Home to a team ranked so low - why are we giving them space? Why are we sitting back? We're at home, we need a win - have a go! In the 2nd half we did that, and they suddenly looked poor, but they'd only looked good because we'd let them.
I think McClean is fairly limited in some ways, but he has an attitude to go and attack them, and that's sometimes what we lack. And against a team like Germany, I think that to avoid an onslaught, we need to give them a reason to respect our attack and attacking intent.
Olé Olé
07/09/2015, 10:19 PM
I've only just noticed that we've got the meanest defence in the group by 2 goals- that is while both full backs can attack quite liberally and both have had spells of their careers as wingers. Plus, Clark is an improvement beside O'Shea, I think, so that's another positive from this weekend.
Our midfield isn't bad either, in spite of the negativity that would have been flung at McCarthy or Whelan by some corners of the media were our strikers to have missed a few sitters tonight and the game ended in a 0-0 draw.
Bottle of Tonic
07/09/2015, 10:29 PM
I did not think we had that second half in us. First was one of the grimmest I've sat through. I know it's only Georgia, but I'm chuffed with that. The first half was so pedestrian I couldn't see how we'd inject some life into the match. There was a bit of needle and scrapping early into the second period and it provided us with the fuel to keep the intensity up throughout the second 45. Well done to team and management on this occasion.
BonnieShels
07/09/2015, 11:07 PM
I am sick to death about the negativity around this team. The RTE panel are a joke and over the top, writing the team off before the game and at half time. At full time, there is talk of beating Germany. It is full of contradictions and unfortunately your average joe public listens to these guys. Even the posts here around half time are way OTT.
Yes we are not brilliant, yes we don't play beautiful but we are doing alright in this group. We have an excellent chance to qualify now. We were never going to roll Georgia over, it wasn't that long ago that we scraped by them in Croker with a dodgey pen.
The one thing I do agree with the rte panel is that the team seem to lack belief. Despite playing well in the second half, we retreated into a shell thereafter instead of pushing on. But is it any wonder this team has no belief given public perception led by that rte panel.
In fairness that's not altogether true. The panel were as positive as I've seen them in a long while whilst being realistic about our chances v Germany (Giles and Brady). Totally OTT at the end from Eamonn but that's classic Dunphy.
Let's take the victory and move on and dream of beating the North in Marseille next year.
DannyInvincible
07/09/2015, 11:07 PM
Whelan - 5. He was there. A few shots from distance, a stupid bit of guff to the ref. Won't cry any tears over his suspension.
I thought this was one of Whelan's better games. He showed leadership, won tackles, won headers, tidied up and moved the ball around well. Fair enough, he did completely sh*t himself when he found himself in a near one-on-one with their keeper, before turning around (I don't think he even looked at goal) knowing he was always going to lose the race on speed. It was a moment that was as forgiveable as it was amusing. But no, I would definitely rate him at the very least a 7, if not an 8, tonight.
Hendrick has really impressed me these last two games. He's an excellent player and will be playing EPL football very soon if he gets a move his ability deserves.
Really? I think that's very unfair to Long. McCleans cross was fast, not much time for Long to adjust his feet at all. A good chance, sure, but not as simple as being made out. Also, the sort of chance that Keane missed many times in his career and I don't think today's Keane would have been in that spot.
One more thing, I'd like to see a hd breakdown of that chance. In one of the replays it looked like Long actually got a touch on it, then blocked by defenders boot, then off Long and out for the goal kick. (My stream wasn't awful but wasn't great either).
Maybe I'd need to re-watch it. However, from what I can recall, Long got a slight touch but completely scuffed it, resulting in it coming off the defender rather than going into the back of the net. I thought it was the sort of chance he should be putting away if he wants to end the Long-Robbie debate once and for all. But perhaps I'm being overly expectant in my desire for him to have scored it. I'd need to watch it again to be certain.
I think McClean is fairly limited in some ways, but he has an attitude to go and attack them, and that's sometimes what we lack. And against a team like Germany, I think that to avoid an onslaught, we need to give them a reason to respect our attack and attacking intent.
Definitely. You can see the instinctive difference between, on the one hand, a player like McClean and, on the other hand, players like Whelan and McCarthy who lack a bit of progressive or forward-moving initiative, if you could call it that. There were two separate moments tonight when the latter two could have powered on forward towards goal as there was space to do so, but even daring to do so didn't seem to cross their minds. The yellow sees McClean suspended for the Germany game though, doesn't it?
If it transpires that ourselves and Poland need just a point each from the final game in order to secure our respective positions in the final group standings, what are the chances of a Warsaw pact? :cool:
DannyInvincible
07/09/2015, 11:29 PM
If this game was O'Neill's defining game, I think he's well and truly passed the test. I think that's worth saying. What did the RTÉ panel have to say for their doom-mongering the other night? Did they credit O'Neill for having delivered?
Good article here: http://www.sportsjoe.ie/football/is-it-not-about-time-that-martin-oneill-is-given-some-sort-of-praise/38863
brine3
07/09/2015, 11:40 PM
that long goal v Poland was from about 2 yards and needed a deflection to take it past the keeper. hardly proves he is a better option than keane
The argument for Keane is that while he is not fast, physical or offers aerial prowess, he gets you goals. When we play Keane we have a passenger in the team. That was never a problem when he was getting the goals against Germany and France, but now he is only getting the goals against Gibraltar.
If Keane isn't getting the goals, then you might as well play Long. He offers you pace, he hustles like Keane can no longer hustle, and he has aerial ability. He is a handful for defenders, which can help stretch defences and open up opportunities, either for himself or for others. The Georgia match tonight was a game of two halves. When Long came on he helped to stretch the Georgian defence and make room for others.
brine3
07/09/2015, 11:44 PM
Hendrick has really impressed me these last two games. He's an excellent player and will be playing EPL football very soon if he gets a move his ability deserves.
I've been impressed by him ever since that amazing assist to Hoolahan in the friendly against Poland a couple of years ago. That was something special. Been following him closely since.
I really hope he doesn't end up in the EPL, but in a continental league which would suit him better.
osarusan
07/09/2015, 11:46 PM
If this game was O'Neill's defining game, I think he's well and truly passed the test. I think that's worth saying.
I don't think it was a defining game, and I don't think he well and truly passed the test either, to be honest.
We played a pretty poor team and looked just as poor as them for 45 minutes, and I don't think that the tactical change was much more than 'press them further up the pitch and deny them time on the ball.' We got a 1-0 win at home to the 5th seeds.
I'd say it is very possible that we will go to Poland in the last game needing something to make the playoffs or even the automatic spot (we lose to Germany, Scotland draw with or beat Poland). That game - and O'Neill's approach to it - would be the defining game for me, if it happens.
geysir
07/09/2015, 11:52 PM
An evil first half, probably after a hot half time talk from O'Neiil that hit the right buttons, we had a good 2nd half and from the 60th minute onwards it began to look like an irish team on the job, brilliant improvisation from (Jimmy) Hendrix and after that we closed it out nicely.
That Georgian team probably would have beaten us in the 2012 campaign, they were better that any other incarnation we have played against.
We are what we are, average but eventually enjoyably spirited.
brine3
07/09/2015, 11:57 PM
I thought the panel on RTE got a bit carried away with Long's contribution. His miss was poor and Walters finished a similar chance with more pressure from the defender. That miss summed up why he didn't start- goals win games (even if Robbie wasn't great in the first half).
Shane Long's chance wasn't that easy. Robbie Keane missed an easier chance in the same game, yet Long gets stick...
The problem here is that you are measuring 28 year old long against the standards of a 28 year old Robbie Keane. I'd pick that Robbie too. But 28 year old Robbie Keane doesn't exist any more. He's 35 now and in this campaign he has scored zero goals in 303 minutes (five full hours) against the non-Gibraltar teams.
SwanVsDalton
08/09/2015, 12:31 AM
Just back from the game - thought it was one of the worst 45 minutes of O'Neill's tenure followed by much better in the second half.
That first half - oy vey. It was barmy bad. Our midfielders (except Whelan) were getting pulled all over the place defensively, Brady was cleaned out at LB in the first 20 minutes and we generally looked like we were freaking out all over the pitch up until about the 35th minute.
Our tactics, shape and purposefulness seemed completely off. We played far too narrow, and with personnel already suffering with some brittle self-confidence, it led to poor decision making, passing and crossing.
Final ten minutes of the first half we improved. And a possibly red-hot dressing room talking too improved us even more - dominating a half against an awkward opponent like Georgia is probably as good as we can hope for. They certainly tired, but I was really impressed by the work rate of the team in general. Although some of the silly errors we made up until the 60th minute was incredible (there was a period of ten minutes where we went on an incredible streak of misplacing ten-yard passes and miscontrolling easy balls).
Credit the team for getting the goal and getting the win. Job done. It's not a clean bill for O'Neill - the players have to take responsibility for being so flat, but we looked poorly set up in the first 45. But credit for being decisive and getting us the team moving in the right direction.
Quick player thoughts
Given 5: Bit harsh maybe? He gives me the heebies. His distribution was appalling as well. Had very little to do but did very little well.
Coleman 6: Not at his best, some very silly errors and poor crossing but his attacking verve was much needed.
O'Shea 6: Solid, particularly in the second half. Good leadership, much needed.
Clark 6: Looked solid, particularly beside O'Shea but does have a mistake or two in him.
Brady 6: If it was after the first 45, it would have been a 4. He was awful in the first 15 minutes, not just for his hilarious shank out for the corner but mostly for getting dragged out of position like the Armenian forwards had him with a magnet. In fairness, he was playing with no cover in front since the midfield were also getting dragged all over the shop but he looked completely out of place. Credit him then for having a pretty good 60 minutes and a very good second half. I do seriously worry about his positioning though (if this seems like overkill on one player, he was right in front of me in the first half).
Whelan 8: His best game for Ireland in an age. He was superb, even in the first half when nothing was going right. Great tackling, covering and constantly willing to get on the ball and set the tempo, pushing forward from deep. A leader. On this form, a big miss against Germany.
McCarthy 6: Poor first half, plenty of silly errors in the second but much more endeavour. He still looks incredibly tentative in green.
Hendrick 7: Incredible skill for the goal. Wonderous. Up until then, things wern't going for his way. Credit though, he even mentioned in the post-match invterview that he'd given the ball away cheaply four times before the goal. Like his style.
Hoolahan 6: Natural intelligence gets him into good positions and on the ball but, like Friday, misplaced some final passes or took the wrong decision on occasion.
Walters 9: Fantastic work rate + great ability at leading the line + another crucial goal in green = most underrated player in our team at present.
Keane 4: Is this the end of Keane as a realistic starter? I think so. Injury aside, almost impossible to believe he'll start against Germany or Poland.
Long 7: I credit the second half turnaround more to a much improved team performance rather than Long's introduction, but there's no doubt he linked far better with Walters, Hoolahan et al. Still, absolutely had to hit the target with the chance he had. Just scuffed it.
McClean 7: Part of me thinks he got suspended on purpose to be available for Poland. Possibly a bit too caluclated for a whirlwind like James, but still. Unlucky not to score.
DeLorean
08/09/2015, 12:37 AM
Brilliant result - Martin O'Neill said afterwards that "we found a way to win". It's one of those absolutely bullet proof sporting clichés. We won, therefore we found a way to win. What it really means is that for a long time it looked as though it wasn't going to happen.
What occured with twenty minutes to go is more fitting of an even more common cliché, 'it will take a mistake or a moment of genius to separate the sides'. How often do we hear that, and how often does the moment of genius actually arrive? Seldom enough, and even more infrequent in our case. We've produced it twice against Georgia in this campaign though.
Hendrick didn't have an outstanding ninety minutes by any reasoning, and he had two very poor moments, by the left touchline, early on the second half. Many a young player would go into hiding from then on but he got stronger and stronger. He really has something about him.
At the risk of being accused of getting carried away in the moment, which there might be some truth in, this wasn't the first time he's produced a bit of magic for us. His assist for John O'Shea's equaliser in Germany was technically brilliant. His control, vision and technique to set up Wes Hoolahan, just minutes into his debut against Poland, was also a cut above the norm.
Every so often he loses form and sometimes his place at Derby, but from what I've seen they never look better without him, and he has contributed heavily to all of their best performances over the past couple of years.
He's a bit more ballsy in possession than McCarthy and Whelan, in particular, also. To go all Paul O'Shea on it, you'd really have to have been at the match to see Coleman in acres of space on numerous occasions, and instead of McCarthy or Whelan providing quick ball to set him on his way, it was taking two or three short passes to give him possession. By then the acres had disappeared, needless to say. Hendrick played at least two long range passes in similar situations, and was unlucky not to put Keane in on goal in the first half also.
Martin O'Neill deserves credit for sticking with him, the easier option would have been to play a more specialised winger and try to get as many crosses into Walters as possible. He looks to have found a bit of a system, it needs plenty of work but I suppose the only way to do that is by continuing to play it. I can see the logic, it gives us a bit of solidity in the middle and we have the bodies to avoid being overrun completely, which was the major flaw in Trap's system. We have two ideal fullbacks to provide the width, but we have to accept it won't always be possible for them to just bomb forward.
As for the rest of the match, probably a bit of a mixed bag but I have to say (as I did after the Poland game also) that Whelan really does surprise me every so often, and it's usually when I've fully decided I'd be happier to see him replaced. I think somebody gave him a rating of 5/10 a page or two back, I'd have to suggest that whoever it was should take another look. That's not being smart by the way, of course opinions can still differ. He was outstanding though I thought and my man of the match for sure. Aggression, showing for the ball, even displaying energy levels to join in with the attack I never knew he had.
I feel a bit sorry for McCarthy but he threw himself about to be fair. He's generally appearing further forward than Whelan and the area he normally patrols for Everton. It might just take a bit of getting used to and he could be an ideal man for really pressing the opposition up the pitch when he gets to grips with it fully.
Walters was Walters, he's a warrior in fairness but there were about three instances where I was cursing our luck that it wasn't Long in the same situation and he would have been through on goal, granted one of these was in the first half and Long wasn't even on the pitch. What about that touch from Big Jon by the right touchline in the first half though? Exquisite!
Not an awful lot else really, happy Clark is in the side and two clean sheets will serve him well. Hoolahan had a tough night, we're just not really playing the ball through him so it's a bit of a thankless task for him at the moment.
DeLorean
08/09/2015, 12:43 AM
There's been about ten posts since I actually finished writing that, apologies for the bit of repetition!
geysir
08/09/2015, 12:55 AM
apologies for the bit of repetition!
You could use that line for your signature.
DeLorean
08/09/2015, 12:58 AM
Anything for you Geysie!
tricky_colour
08/09/2015, 1:31 AM
I thought that Georgia were not anywhere near as good as the panel seemed to think. That scuffed shot in the 2nd half aside, Given's mis-control of a backpass was probably as good a chance as they had.
We just need to have a bit more belief in our own ability to impose our game on the opposition, rather than letting them impose their game on us.
Home to a team ranked so low - why are we giving them space? Why are we sitting back? We're at home, we need a win - have a go! In the 2nd half we did that, and they suddenly looked poor, but they'd only looked good because we'd let them.
I think McClean is fairly limited in some ways, but he has an attitude to go and attack them, and that's sometimes what we lack. And against a team like Germany, I think that to avoid an onslaught, we need to give them a reason to respect our attack and attacking intent.
But they beat Scotland who gave German a tough game, just goes to show with a bit of luck anything is possible.
Spudulika
08/09/2015, 4:11 AM
Ireland did what they had to do, kept on top of the Georgians as much as possible, then when they burned out around the hour mark, pushed on more and scored. Reading the comments from the RTE panel is embarrassing this morning. I know that they are there to entertain and keep the ratings high so that our taxpayer funded organisation can sell more commercials, but it's a bit much.
Georgia are Georgia, lots of decent players but a severe attitude problem. Ireland did a professional job which Scotland failed to do, MON and RMK have been developing a squad of players and trying to build momentum, but the Football Manager playing public and ex-pros on TV know better, far better. When you look at where our players are playing, we're doing great to be in the hunt for qualification. The Irish-born players have been failed by the local association and too often sold across the water for a quick buck, and the English/Scottish Academies are producing such a dearth of quality players it's shameful. So maybe we need to appreciate what we have, what we're doing and actually admit MON knows what he's doing, despite the meeja nonsense.
Whelan was great last night, covering tackles for "flair" players and knocking the ball around. He's a player who will be sadly missed next time out.
ArdeeBhoy
08/09/2015, 6:40 AM
Pretty mediocre. The Germans & Poles rubbing their hands?
Disappointment to follow, I reckon.
ifk101
08/09/2015, 7:01 AM
I think we have a play-off spot now anyways as Scotland will struggle to beat the Poles.
DannyInvincible
08/09/2015, 7:08 AM
I think we have a play-off spot now anyways as Scotland will struggle to beat the Poles.
I think I'm right in saying that if we happened to lose our final two games and Scotland manage a point against Poland (and beat Gibraltar), we'd lose out on head-to-head with Scotland.
ifk101
08/09/2015, 7:11 AM
Yes, but assuming Scotland and Poland draw, and we lose to Germany, isn't our final game with Poland set up for a draw?
Because with Poland 3 points ahead of us, a lost to us would put us ahead of them on head-to-head. If they secure a draw they qualify, if we secure a draw we're in the play-offs.
The Scotland-Poland game effectively decides the group.
Stuttgart88
08/09/2015, 7:18 AM
I'm glad to see Whelan's performance recognised.
With the suspensions it's hard to try and guess what MON will select for Germany. Meyler straight swap? McCarthy Could deputise for Whelan though Wilson could be risked in that role too. Arter and O'Kane might come into O'Neill's plans, and Quinn is close enough to the team all the time anyway.
With McClean out I'd be inclined to put Wilson left back myself and pick Brady LHM. Let Brady focus on his attacking threat and leave the job of defending against the best team in the group to a genuine defender.
Stuttgart88
08/09/2015, 7:22 AM
It's weird, in one sense we want the Poles to beat Scotland as that'd be that for 3rd place. It'd be nice to still have second place to play for on 11th October but that's less likely. I'd still take 3rd place right now if offered tbh, but I've always been risk averse!
ifk101
08/09/2015, 7:29 AM
With McClean out I'd be inclined to put Wilson left back myself and pick Brady LHM. Let Brady focus on his attacking threat and leave the job of defending against the best team in the group to a genuine defender.
Would be more inclined to use Wilson as a direct replacement for Whelan and keep the back four intact.
GypsyBlackCat
08/09/2015, 7:30 AM
We got the win which was the most important thing. But the performance was dire, even the second half. The whole atmosphere around this Ireland team is flat even the crowd couldn't get going. O'Neill's football would put you to sleep. We need more passion and drive in the team. MON needs to take the hand brake off and have a go at teams! We'll get third and it won't go to the last game. Scotland will crack against Poland and the Poles will win.
DannyInvincible
08/09/2015, 7:36 AM
Yes, but assuming Scotland and Poland draw, and we lose to Germany, isn't our final game with Poland set up for a draw?
Because with Poland 3 points ahead of us, a lost to us would put us ahead of them on head-to-head. If they secure a draw they qualify, if we secure a draw we're in the play-offs.
Ah, of course; the Warsaw Pact scenario.
DeLorean
08/09/2015, 7:52 AM
It's fairly simple for me now, the ideal (realistic) scenario is that Scotland can't catch us going into the final round, but we can catch Poland. Realistically we need a draw against Germany for that to happen, with Scotland and Poland cancelling each other out as well. Wins for ourselves and Poland will obviously set up that scenario as well but that's getting into far fetched territory. If we can't get something from Germany, then we're probably just better off if Poland end Scotland's interests, otherwise the final game will be torture. That said, winning in Poland might be a smaller ask than many off our playoff possibilities.
Stuttgart88
08/09/2015, 8:04 AM
The prospect of that torture in Warsaw is what has me wishing for a Scotland defeat at home to Poland. Just give us third place and let that be that! Seriously though, I'm not wasting my time hoping for or guessing outcomes of the remaining games. Everything is contingent on everything else. A draw at home to Germany might not even be a good result, or it might be ideal.
jbyrne
08/09/2015, 8:14 AM
the FAI website has the Germany game down for a 8.45pm ko. surely this is wrong? anyone confirm?
Olé Olé
08/09/2015, 8:28 AM
If Keane isn't getting the goals, then you might as well play Long. He offers you pace, he hustles like Keane can no longer hustle, and he has aerial ability. He is a handful for defenders, which can help stretch defences and open up opportunities, either for himself or for others. The Georgia match tonight was a game of two halves. When Long came on he helped to stretch the Georgian defence and make room for others.
Very hypothetical but if Keane were in Long's position for the ball from McClean then I'm 99% certain he'd have finished it.
tetsujin1979
08/09/2015, 8:32 AM
the FAI website has the Germany game down for a 8.45pm ko. surely this is wrong? anyone confirm?
It's down as 8:45-on uefa.com as well - http://www.uefa.com/uefaeuro/qualifiers/season=2016/standings/round=2000446/group=2002431/index.html - but I had assumed that was CET?
jbyrne
08/09/2015, 8:37 AM
It's down as 8:45-on uefa.com as well - http://www.uefa.com/uefaeuro/qualifiers/season=2016/standings/round=2000446/group=2002431/index.html - but I had assumed that was CET?
8.45 would make no sense. my money is that the FAIs site is an error
GypsyBlackCat
08/09/2015, 8:43 AM
the FAI website has the Germany game down for a 8.45pm ko. surely this is wrong? anyone confirm?
Someone using cut and paste on the FAI website. It's 8.45 CET so 7.45 our time.
Olé Olé
08/09/2015, 8:55 AM
Shane Long's chance wasn't that easy. Robbie Keane missed an easier chance in the same game, yet Long gets stick...
The problem here is that you are measuring 28 year old long against the standards of a 28 year old Robbie Keane. I'd pick that Robbie too. But 28 year old Robbie Keane doesn't exist any more. He's 35 now and in this campaign he has scored zero goals in 303 minutes (five full hours) against the non-Gibraltar teams.
Shane Long's chance was easy. Which chance of Robbie's do you refer to? The one early in the first half? At least he got something on the ball, Long hit fresh air.
Worst thing is, I don't like entering these debates because I love Long. In fact, I'd like to see Keane and Long up front together as it would provide the best of both worlds. But that would mean Walters wouldn't play and Walters is pivotal at the moment. His goals in 2015 alone have earned us 4 valuable points at home.
pineapple stu
08/09/2015, 8:58 AM
Long's chance wasn't that easy. But he still should have done better.
Spudulika
08/09/2015, 9:01 AM
We got the win which was the most important thing. But the performance was dire, even the second half. The whole atmosphere around this Ireland team is flat even the crowd couldn't get going. O'Neill's football would put you to sleep. We need more passion and drive in the team. MON needs to take the hand brake off and have a go at teams! We'll get third and it won't go to the last game. Scotland will crack against Poland and the Poles will win.
I don't understand the passion thing that everyone speaks about, and the crowd? If we've now got a nation of prawn sandwich heads who were reared on the snorefests that are Primera Liga or Saturday evneing MOTD highlights, then, yes, it's not great. We'll soon end up like the moronic masses who have to be told when to sing and how to behave (a la Russia, Croatia and Germany).
Agree with the Scots cracking, I think the result in Georgia finished them. Strachan out!
Olé Olé
08/09/2015, 9:15 AM
Long's chance wasn't that easy. But he still should have done better.
Ok, maybe it wasn't that easy (the ball was coming at pace etc.) but he should have got something on it. It actually pains me to be critical of the chance but I'm just disappointed he didn't put to bed the notion that he's not a finisher. He took his goals against Poland and Gibraltar this year. That one against Georgia was there for the taking too.
brine3
08/09/2015, 9:21 AM
Very hypothetical but if Keane were in Long's position for the ball from McClean then I'm 99% certain he'd have finished it.
That was a very difficult ball moving at pace.
It's unfair on Long that every time he gets even a half chance, people start saying, "Keane would have scored that". Arguably the worst miss of the night was from Keane himself, yet here we are talking about Shane Long not back heeling in a ball that was moving at serious pace. That was not an easy move for any striker to pull off.
NeverFeltBetter
08/09/2015, 9:25 AM
I'd question, at that stage of the game, if Keane would even have been in that position. He was taken off for a reason, it was clear that the Gibraltar game had taken a bit out of him. He offered very little in the half that he played. It was absolutely the right call to sub him, and Long made a much bigger impact than Keane did, even if he didn't score.
Yard of Pace
08/09/2015, 9:26 AM
In fact, I'd like to see Keane and Long up front together as it would provide the best of both worlds. .
How many games have Keane and Long started together, does anyone know?
Is there anything to be said for a (yeah I know it's MLS, but....) back in form Kevin Doyle?
Olé Olé
08/09/2015, 9:28 AM
That was a very difficult ball moving at pace.
It's unfair on Long that every time he gets even a half chance, people start saying, "Keane would have scored that". Arguably the worst miss of the night was from Keane himself, yet here we are talking about Shane Long not back heeling in a ball that was moving at serious pace. That was not an easy move for any striker to pull off.
And some of the stuff that has been said by you about Keane hasn't been unfair on him? Come off it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.