Bohs SCP discussion [Archive] - Page 8

marinobohs

26/01/2010, 1:00 PM

Not really, Rovers bottled it at the end, and that hurts.

But there is an issue about cheating that needs to be adressed, and last season, you were it.

more unsubstansiated garbage from the master of same who has the cheek to bleat when anyone questions the shams past :rolleyes:. If you have proof of cheating by any club then send it to the FAI otherwise accept the best team won the League and move on and for gods sake give up the spoilt child routine.

marinobohs

26/01/2010, 1:11 PM

SkStu

26/01/2010, 1:35 PM

Absolutly ,that SKSTU bloke must hold the record for reporting posts on this mb,I work with two Bohs members who freely admit they dont know whats going on most of the time at Dalymount but this Canadian keyboard jockey has his finger on the pulse,yeah right.

good to know that i annoy you. However, I have reported maybe 3 or 4 Bohs related posts in my time here, for all the good it has done. But im sure you and your Rovers mates have all the stats like you do for everything else.

I think youll find that, if you read my posts, i dont claim to have the inside scoop on happenings in Phibsborough. You and your hooped buddies are the only ones who ever claim that privilege.

Oh, and im Irish, not Canadian.

CMcC

26/01/2010, 1:52 PM

Not really, Rovers bottled it at the end, and that hurts.

But there is an issue about cheating that needs to be adressed, and last season, you were it.

If thinking you were cheated out of a league makes it easier for you to deal with the obvious hurt you still feel then knock yourself out. Wollow away.

wexfordned

26/01/2010, 2:05 PM

Rovers did have questions and sent them to the FAI and you had a hissy fit.

Long and the short of it is you know full well you are goosed this season and what annoys you more is that we are rubbing it in than the actual fact that your finances are unravelling.

There are several things that annoy bohs fans but I would say the main ones relating to your club are:

1 Shamrock fans allowed to post any sorts of rubbish/lies here demanding explanations when there are clearly none necessary or any attempt is simply ignored or derided as rubbish "we know that's not true, we know everything"

2. The Shamrock board who had the 2009 accounts for the best part of a year wait until a week or so after they bottle the league then run to the FAI/papers with rumours and innuendo to try and claim a league title "Ollie Byrne" (RIP) style

CMcC

26/01/2010, 2:14 PM

And if you think that sort of half arsed reverse psychology will make these questions about your finances go away, then knock yourself out.

Still under embargo, budget for 2010 rejected and a manager who wont even speak to his board. Yeah, its all jealousy. :D

I dont do psychology. I just cant get over your obvious obsession. Surely its not all about being sore, bitter, twisted and jealous that it appears to be?

Although today the press say your club has signed a new player and I doubt if you've even posted on it so obsessed you seem to be with all financial things red and black (or should i say black and tan).

CMcC

26/01/2010, 2:39 PM

really? because I'm on two threads winding the sligs up....

Dennehy

dahamsta

26/01/2010, 3:34 PM

really? because I'm on two threads winding the sligs up....Thanks. Suspended. Given your record, the next one will result in deletion.

Leejo

26/01/2010, 3:46 PM

Thanks. Suspended. Given your record, the next one will result in deletion.

Fair play. Amazing it actually took this long for someone to step in and put a stop to the tripe he writes up here though

dahamsta

26/01/2010, 4:18 PM

Has to be handled within the rules. That's why we have a post reporting system.

Rovers1

26/01/2010, 5:06 PM

Class!! :D I love a bit of moderation!

Mr A

26/01/2010, 5:16 PM

Class!! :D I love a bit of moderation!

Me too. Especially when there is neither too much nor too little of it.

hoopy

26/01/2010, 6:09 PM

We are all aware that shams "invented" the members owned club in 2005 (previous quotes about 50 pound directors were the OTHER crowd :rolleyes:) I never said either club was waiting to approach Bohs just suggested that a club which previously slagged off memebers owned clubs is hardly the place to go for advice about same.
Perhaps (given experience here) shams think membership entitles them to run every club in the League but afraid it isn't true.

So you're saying I'm making up the fact that two of our board members spoke to Drogheda fans at a meeting up there to help them out? I know it sickens you that we know so much of what goes on at you're club, but this isn't about Bohs so you don't have to deny it, then later say you knew all along, as seems to be your tactic. Hopefully a Drogheda fan or Foras member can come on and confirm, though even then you'll say it didn't happen.

Rovers1

26/01/2010, 6:23 PM

Shamrock fans are OBSESSED!:eek:

R�iteoir

26/01/2010, 6:45 PM

Fair play. Amazing it actually took this long for someone to step in and put a stop to the tripe he writes up here though

I think the phrase "Give them enough rope" springs to mind here

thischarmingman

26/01/2010, 7:01 PM

Me too. Especially when there is neither too much nor too little of it.

"...and I for one welcome our new insect overlords..."

RoversHead

26/01/2010, 7:18 PM

Any news on the embargo being lifted?apologies for bringing the thread back to Bohs ropey accounting in relation to the scp

LukeO

26/01/2010, 8:15 PM

"...and I for one welcome our new insect overlords..."

Rodent overlords. ;)

SkStu

26/01/2010, 9:46 PM

Any news on the embargo being lifted?

no, but im sure you'll be the first to know.

de bowez

26/01/2010, 11:22 PM

Any news on the embargo being lifted?apologies for bringing the thread back to Bohs ropey accounting in relation to the scp

Surely the Rovers message board is the place to look for that, has there not been any announcements on your official site?

RoversHead

27/01/2010, 9:42 AM

Surely the Rovers message board is the place to look for that, has there not been any announcements on your official site?Ill take that as a "we still dont know whats going on"
But Ill do my best to keep you all updated should I hear that its been lifted.Any news on the sale of the ground to Albion?

marinobohs

27/01/2010, 3:00 PM

So you're saying I'm making up the fact that two of our board members spoke to Drogheda fans at a meeting up there to help them out? I know it sickens you that we know so much of what goes on at you're club, but this isn't about Bohs so you don't have to deny it, then later say you knew all along, as seems to be your tactic. Hopefully a Drogheda fan or Foras member can come on and confirm, though even then you'll say it didn't happen.

Relax, and read the post you are quoting. I never said the meetings did not happen (as I said before I am never surprised at shams capacity to lecture other clubs) I simply pointed out the irony of a club that was previously so anti member owned clubs now extolling the virtues of the same model to others.
for the record ,I am happy to take your word that the meetings took place and am delighted to see shams belated understanding of the merits of member owner clubs.

Ill take that as a "we still dont know whats going on"
But Ill do my best to keep you all updated should I hear that its been lifted.Any news on the sale of the ground to Albion?

no developments on the sale of Dalymount (as expected - read previous posts). I have suggested to the club we bring in some additional outside expertise and offered to arrange contact with a Mr Loius Kilcoyne who has previous experience in the area of such sales.

shantykelly

27/01/2010, 6:43 PM

I'm confused - whay are rovers fans getting all hot and bothered about bohs fans refusing to discuss what is to them confidential info about the club?

Ashbohs

27/01/2010, 7:10 PM

Its hard to know.Some people call it jealousy ,others obsession.

dong

27/01/2010, 7:11 PM

no developments on the sale of Dalymount (as expected - read previous posts). I have suggested to the club we bring in some additional outside expertise and offered to arrange contact with a Mr Loius Kilcoyne who has previous experience in the area of such sales.

Ah but they are happy where they are now...
Milltown's just a fuzzy memory. Great isn't it?

RoversHead

27/01/2010, 9:06 PM

Ah but they are happy where they are now...
Milltown's just a fuzzy memory. Great isn't it?you suppoert the wrong Rovers to get an infraction for that post, troll away to your hearts delight.Byctwd got a suspension for winding yous up by explaining what a standerd players contract is ,at least his posts were thread related.

dong

27/01/2010, 9:40 PM

you suppoert the wrong Rovers to get an infraction for that post

There's only one Rovers.:D

Probably deserve one for that in fairness..

marinobohs

28/01/2010, 8:51 AM

you suppoert the wrong Rovers to get an infraction for that post, troll away to your hearts delight.Byctwd got a suspension for winding yous up by explaining what a standerd players contract is ,at least his posts were thread related.

Not content with telling Bohs, Drogs, Cork and the FAI how to run things now it is the turn of FOOT.IE :rolleyes:

Dalymountrower

28/01/2010, 8:58 AM

Absolutly ,,I work with two Bohs members who freely admit they dont know whats going on most of the time at Dalymount

Well i`m a Bohs member, not a board member, I attend the members meetings and I get the confidential minutes of those meetings Details in respect of our SCP status for 2009 , our prospective budget for 2010 and the performance it was based on, were clearly set out at confidential information meetings and an EGM in October and November 2009. I would suspect that a lot of Bohs posters on this thread have the same access to info as I have , hence the certainty and robust nature of our responses to other posters` idle speculation, and, in some cases, malicious rumour mongering
Fair play to the Bohs members you work with for not sharing any of that cofidential information with you.
Btw I wouldn`t think much of any of my Rovers friends if they were spilling the beans to me about internal matters in their own club.

marinobohs

28/01/2010, 9:43 AM

Well i`m a Bohs member, not a board member, I attend the members meetings and I get the confidential minutes of those meetings Details in respect of our SCP status for 2009 , our prospective budget for 2010 and the performance it was based on, were clearly set out at confidential information meetings and an EGM in October and November 2009. I would suspect that a lot of Bohs posters on this thread have the same access to info as I have , hence the certainty and robust nature of our responses to other posters` idle speculation, and, in some cases, malicious rumour mongering
Fair play to the Bohs members you work with for not sharing any of that cofidential information with you.
Btw I wouldn`t think much of any of my Rovers friends if they were spilling the beans to me about internal matters in their own club.

Never ceases to amaze me how posters expect Bohs fans here to divulge every financial detail concerning our club :eek: As no shams have detailed the financial detals of their budget etc can we conclude they "dont know whats going on at their club" ?
The ironioc thing is that given the memebrs access to information Bohs affairs are probobly the most open in the LOI.

blackholesun

28/01/2010, 9:51 AM

The ironioc thing is that given the memebrs access to information Bohs affairs are probobly the most open in the LOI.

Alot of the Bohs info is in the public domain because of blunders like handing out copies of the accounts to away fans buying tickets from Dalymount.

:rolleyes:

bhs

marinobohs

28/01/2010, 9:56 AM

Alot of the Bohs info is in the public domain because of blunders like handing out copies of the accounts to away fans buying tickets from Dalymount.

:rolleyes:

bhs

Thanks for proving my point :D There is no club in the LOI that is more open than Bohs on financial matters. Probobly just allows saddos dream up more conspiracys (and report non existent breaches to the FAI).
Maybe the way forward is for all clubs to put their accounts on a dedicated web site. Think of the fun some posters would have then :eek:

RoversHead

29/01/2010, 8:37 AM

Gerry Conway to step down at forthcoming agm ,the plot thickens,

CMcC

29/01/2010, 8:45 AM

And what plot would that be, oh fountain of knowledge?

RoversHead

29/01/2010, 9:27 AM

And what plot would that be, oh fountain of knowledge?You will have to wait for the AGM it will be a cracker.

marinobohs

29/01/2010, 10:01 AM

Gerry Conway to step down at forthcoming agm ,the plot thickens,

Oh woe, Gerry to step down due to personal commitments. What will shams do ?
Having critisesed him staying on the Bohs board when most of the previous regime "left" they now read a conspiracy in his departure :rolleyes: still amazes me how obsessed they are with the internal running of bohemian FC. :D

You will have to wait for the AGM it will be a cracker.

As the saying goes - put up or shut up. if you know something feel free to tell us all, if not then give up your fixation with what is none of your business.

RoversHead

29/01/2010, 12:30 PM

bad mongo

29/01/2010, 12:45 PM

dfx-

29/01/2010, 2:10 PM

Not content with telling Bohs, Drogs, Cork and the FAI how to run things now it is the turn of FOOT.IE :rolleyes:

Did we leave out Derry so? Damn, you could've said before now..

marinobohs

29/01/2010, 2:51 PM

Calm down Marino,if you want this and other Bohs private issues kept out of the public domain ,then stop factions on your board leeking the information to journos .Ask yourself why its being leeked ,ask yourself why he is doing it at an AGM instead of now, giving your members time to democraticaly elect a replacement instead of leaving it open for a replacement to be co opted onto the board.The "plot thickens"phrase was me quoeting the Bohs member who showed me the article at work this morning.

(1) as I invited you to tell what (if anything) you know I was hardly trying to keep anything "out of the public domain" - offer still stands, put up or...

(2) A club official has indicated he is stepping down due to personal commitments - hardly earth shattering in any organisation.

(3) Any officer of the club can be deselected at any AGM/EGM should enough members decide that is the appropriate action. If necessary an EGM can be called to facilitate such an eventuality. As with most voluntary posts (in all clubs) the club has greater difficulty getting people to serve on the board than it ever had removing someone.

(4) With regard to "leaking information to journos", we did have a problem in the recent past with one individual but my understanding is that the person is no longer on the board ( I am not on the board so am open to correction on that). As I said before our affairs are more public given the open structure of our club and attract lazy journos (especially given our current position as LOI champions).

Based on the above I would see no reason to suspect a "plot" or anything else in this but again if you know different feel free to share ;)

CMcC

29/01/2010, 2:58 PM

Did we leave out Derry so? Damn, you could've said before now..

Maybe all the Shams on here would be better served ensuring their board and manager puts a team on the pitch that will win something. That would make a pleasant change for them. All their wet dreams about Bohs' imminent implosion wont change the fact that they have a team devoid of back bone and possessing not a single bottle amongst them.

forza

29/01/2010, 3:09 PM

(1) as I invited you to tell what (if anything) you know I was hardly trying to keep anything "out of the public domain" - offer still stands, put up or...

(2) A club official has indicated he is stepping down due to personal commitments - hardly earth shattering in any organisation.

(3) Any officer of the club can be deselected at any AGM/EGM should enough members decide that is the appropriate action. If necessary an EGM can be called to facilitate such an eventuality. As with most voluntary posts (in all clubs) the club has greater difficulty getting people to serve on the board than it ever had removing someone.

(4) With regard to "leaking information to journos", we did have a problem in the recent past with one individual but my understanding is that the person is no longer on the board ( I am not on the board so am open to correction on that). As I said before our affairs are more public given the open structure of our club and attract lazy journos (especially given our current position as LOI champions).

Based on the above I would see no reason to suspect a "plot" or anything else in this but again if you know different feel free to share ;)

Have you read the thread on your own forum?? There seems to a lot of worried people discussing Gerrys decision to walk, surely a cause for concern what they are saying?

RoversHead

29/01/2010, 9:26 PM

Have you read the thread on your own forum?? There seems to a lot of worried people discussing Gerrys decision to walk, surely a cause for concern what they are saying?Marino has posted on that thread,he is the only one who isnt worried,he also has no worries about Fenlons new contract having a 100 grand get out clause in it,he prefers to bang on about making the champions league group stages and being 10 points clear by June.None as blind as those who refuse to see.

hoopy

30/01/2010, 8:41 AM

Have you read the thread on your own forum?? There seems to a lot of worried people discussing Gerrys decision to walk, surely a cause for concern what they are saying?

It's very worrying for us. Who do we get our laughs from now?

de bowez

30/01/2010, 10:26 AM

It's very worrying for us. Who do we get our laughs from now?

Indeed, its amazing that Rovers fans after years of laughing at him are now trying to claim that the club is doomed because he is stepping down.

My take on it, his position may be untenable if the rest of the board and the manager have no time for him or alternatively he fancies applying for a paid job at the club.

RoversHead

30/01/2010, 12:39 PM

Indeed, its amazing that Rovers fans after years of laughing at him are now trying to claim that the club is doomed because he is stepping down.

My take on it, his position may be untenable if the rest of the board and the manager have no time for him or alternatively he fancies applying for a paid job at the club.Its not really that amazing ,most Bohs fans see his stepping down as a cause for some concern, but all slagging aside only time will tell if he is in fact legging it before the whatsit hits the fan,its highly unlikely he would be entertained for any paid roll at the club eg general manager or ceo ,from what ive heard from the bohs fans at work they cant wait to see the back of him and one or two others.

Dalymountrower

30/01/2010, 1:28 PM

,most Bohs fans see his stepping down as a cause for some concern,............
,from what ive heard from the bohs fans at work they cant wait to see the back of him .

Wishing him gone and being conerned that he`s going? your Bohs mates at work are certainly complex characters. Where do you work, "Existentialist Monthly"?

RoversHead

30/01/2010, 1:53 PM

Wishing him gone and being conerned that he`s going? your Bohs mates at work are certainly complex characters. Where do you work, "Existentialist Monthly"?They are scared of what he might be running from (as are most on your forum)but if you want to bring it back to sounding clever and scoring inane points to take your mind of it work away.

marinobohs

01/02/2010, 9:55 AM

Marino has posted on that thread,he is the only one who isnt worried,he also has no worries about Fenlons new contract having a 100 grand get out clause in it,he prefers to bang on about making the champions league group stages and being 10 points clear by June.None as blind as those who refuse to see.

"Comical Gerry / Gerry hasnt a clue /destroying Bohs / Gerry lies to members" etc etc etc. What do you mean Bohs fans are not concerned he is stepping down ? only in sham world.........

RE Nutseys revised contract, strangely for once you are right - I am not worried. There is no new contract or any new clause in his existing contract (this would render it a new contract) regarding a get out clause. It will be cheaper to buy out the contract simply due to time lapsing since the Dundee Utd proposal. if Nutsey does go it will be because he (and by extension Bohs) are doing so well that Dundee or some other club are impressed enough to buy out his contract in full.

Lots of reasons to be concerned in LOI football but imaginged sham "contract details" are none of them.
Nice to see you improved your source though, the always ultra site was not proving too accurate lately.