"ppl" (text speak isn't allowed on foot.ie) do it for every film. There is a plot summary of every film and every tv episode. If you're on Wikipedia reading a section entitled "Plot Summary" what do you expect to find?Originally Posted by back of the net
Your Chairperson,
Gavin
Membership Advisory Board
"Ex Bardus , Vicis"
There is little or no surprises in it though thats what got me you coul dspot everything a mile off and i know F all about Batman the "fans" probibly spotted even more than me.
I think they missed the boat in having 2 good actors and having so little dialogue and no good scence of the two of them bouncing off each other.
Last edited by anto1208; 25/07/2008 at 2:42 PM.
sorry about the text speak
but surely you can give a summary of a plot without throw big spoilers into it??couldnt ya?
Sort of. Generally that sort of summary is at the very start of wikipedia pages. Anything marked "summary" or similar is typically quite detailed.
Anyway, someone asked that no one post spoilers. I'd just like to remind people about the existence of spoiler tags: SPOILER: Wrap your spoilers in (spoiler) and (/spoiler), but with square brackets (highlight to read - no actual spoilers in this example).
You can't spell failure without FAI
i mean its the surprises/twists that can make/break a film - the general plot can be given without giving away the suprises/twists
but i do accpet you point on the "spoiler tags"
Clapping in the cinema is a lot worse than that. At least on a plane people are there that might hear it(pilot/staff) whereas I doubt the actors/directors of the film would be present at the film.
Life without Rovers, it makes no sense...it's a heartache...nothing but a fools game. S.R.F.C.
I use to really enjoy reading reviews and watching Newsnight review,The View etc but they give away too much of the film.
saw it yday guys ---- absolutely awesome --- better than i ever could have imagined it to be - mind blowing.
left the cinema and my mind was racing - i really thought it was just an exceptional film
the general consnesus is that chris nolan will do a batman trilogy ----- my god its gonna be some task to eclipse the dark knight with batman 3.
One word,
Classic.
He's made vaguely positive noises. The studio will throw money at him until he agrees anyway - this is going to make nine figures before it's done.
I'm very interested to see what they'll come up with next.
You can't spell failure without FAI
Not many villains left for him to go to. At least not without going a bit more comic book/cartoony about it. I mean he's trying to keep it real as possible, but Penguin, Catwoman, Riddler, Mr.Freeze, Poison Ivy or Bain are all too comic book world.He's made vaguely positive noises. The studio will throw money at him until he agrees anyway - this is going to make nine figures before it's done.
I'm very interested to see what they'll come up with next.
He obviously wanted it to be Joker again but of course the tragic death of Heath Ledger has squashed that.
well i would love to see philip seymour hoffman as the penguin - but thats just my personal opinion
after he cast ledger as the joker - i will have eternal faith in nolan and what he does - genius
have my own opinion on the ending and why it sets it up for a third film - but dont want to say it case any1 reads it and has yet to see the film.- dont want to ruin it for those yet to see it.
it will end with a trilogy i believe
couldnt have said it better pike.
classic.
Hoffman would be brilliant even if he was playing Catwoman for God's sake, but is The Penguin a realistic foe in Nolan's Gotham? I doubt it. Unless he goes away from the Comic and comes up with a more real world story for him, which Nolan being Nolan, is well capable of.
Last edited by Pike B; 28/07/2008 at 12:29 PM.
Glad to hear that after some lukewarm comments.Might go to see it tonight.
Take it from me bud, I've seen a lot of movies and the only people who would knock this are people who want to be controversial or wannabe critics. It's a ten without a doubt. Make up your own mind and forget the knockers.
Last edited by Pike B; 28/07/2008 at 12:53 PM.
Ah i wouldnt say that i was trying to be controversial by saying its very good. Its a good film but classic is a bit strong ive seen better films this week never mind this year.
But thats just my opinion i thought Batman begins was a far better movie than the dark knight but i prefer background stories and dialogue rather than action/special effects.Still very good and ill be watching it again before too long.
I've heard actual, real-life people think it was merely good, and read a few critics who disliked it - most of whom seem to have a fetish for Tim Burton and/or Caesar Romero. I don't know what film they went to see. I read one which claimed that the Batman character had no great drama, that his personal crosses to bear weren't readily identifyable to the common man, that he was no Hamlet. Now, I'm no great Shakespeare fan, but I know my Hamlet. What personal tragedies has he to cope with? A murdered father, a trollip of a mother and being done out of the throne of Denmark. Yep, far more tragic than Batman, far more identifiable for the public!
I want to try to put a little perspective on the film. I found Batman's hand-to-hand fighting a little dull - mostly down to the editing. He's less the terrifying ninja menace in the dark of Batman Begins and more a direct physical presence.
Some of the gadgets made me squirm a bit for their implausibility - but I'm an engineer - it's a curse. This was true of Begins too, but a little more so here.
Your milage may vary with the philosophical exchanges between Alfred and Wayne and between Gordon and Batman. They can be a little too blunt - whacking the audience over the head with the message. Some people prefer their messages to be in the plot, not the dialogue. Again, this was true of Begins too,
MINOR SPOILERS AHEAD
There were a few slightly odd jumps - one that comes to mind is Batman going from the Gordons' house to the interrogation of one of Joker's goons - there just isn't enough time given he can't have known where it was. Nolan did something similar in Batman Begins - the end of the chase where Batman's trying to rush Rachael to the Batcave just doesn't make sense - one moment he's just swerved away from three squad cars and a police helicopter and the next he's racing down a lane to the Batcave.
This is all just nit-picking really, but that kind of thing takes me out of the film.
Ledger's Joker is brilliant, with perfect delivery of lines which another actor might have over- or underplayed, like the delivery of "I'm not crazy... I'm not..." during his meeting with the mob, or "That's a very poor choice of words". At the same time, he plays the role with a magnificent physical comedy - just think of his exit from the hospital.
The overbearing paranoia of the city comes across very well, I think. The score is particularly good in this regard. There's scene where a prisoner is to be transported across the city, with the expectation that the Joker will make a move on him in transit. I found myself watching every masked face, certain that one of them must be the Joker.
It's a great film, a real must see.
You can't spell failure without FAI
The last line would have sufficed..
But well done anyway!!I find this very hard to believe. Name one..
Last edited by sligoman; 29/07/2008 at 1:28 AM. Reason: merge and fix quotes
The Orphanage i think is better stunning cinematography great story dialogue acting & twists. Even Batman begins was on sky last week I think that’s a better all round movie.
This is still a very good film and id recommend it to anyone I just think people are going over board on it ive heard people saying it’s the best movie ever made !!!
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks