now lets revert to the original point of the thread 'an All Ireland team' and
lets, like you have already done, use spain as our comparison.
spain: one large majority (those who associate with being spanish) and the minority (those who do not associate with all things spanish) the catalans, basques...etc. a 'hypotetical' united ireland team would represent the entire island where one community would vastly outnumber the other i.e. those who see themselves as irish with a massive majority over those who see themselves as british. so by your arguement there would be no need for the tricolour or anthem to be modified to represent the disenting minority!!
never would have thought of spain so thanks for that ealing!
BTW i didn't 'demand' the removal of symbolism of unionism in relation to NI but merely stated that it is unfair to have one community represented and not the other. espically with one community representing c.53% and the other c.44%. hardly comparable with spain i would think

parity of esteem for both communities. what i suggested (pasted below for ease of reference) was that it would be a fairer situation if
both had their own communities represented (symbolism and anthems) or else new symbolism which represents both equally.
as posted above:
....
it would need cross-community symbolism (incl. flags) and anthems - although it could alternatively play neither anthem and go with 'Danny Boy' or some other song which would unite the people as opposed to divide them. ...
PS - your attempts at spin are becoming tedious and your arguements are getting weaker and weaker. the spanish comparison is verging on the ridiculous
Bookmarks