Thought there was a huge contrast between Coleman and McClean. Both energetic exciting players.
However, I was greatly impressed in the progress that Coleman has made. He has still retained the speed and enthuasiasm at which he attacks. But now most of what he does is very measured and productive.
McClean is like Coleman was a year or two ago. Full of enthuasiasm and energy and attacking threat but sometimes its not very measured, the enthuasiasm gets the better of him and he makes the wrong decisions, loses the ball etc.
He had a couple of good efforts last night but I thought overall his end product was not upto scratch. One of two poor set piece deliveries also mixed in with sublime crosses. In a word, inconsistent.
However, I was greatly impressed in the progress that Coleman has made. He has still retained the speed and enthuasiasm at which he attacks. But now most of what he does is very measured and productive.
McClean is like Coleman was a year or two ago. Full of enthuasiasm and energy and attacking threat but sometimes its not very measured, the enthuasiasm gets the better of him and he makes the wrong decisions, loses the ball etc.
He had a couple of good efforts last night but I thought overall his end product was not upto scratch. One of two poor set piece deliveries also mixed in with sublime crosses. In a word, inconsistent.

Comment