I think it was a decent achievement.
Overall, I think O'Neill's achievements have been decent. the 2016 Euros: Qualification for the finals and then getting out of the group - could we really have expected any better?
Even in the last campaign, we qualified for the playoffs - could we really have expected to top the group ahead of Serbia, Wales, and Austria? Certainly, being so utterly dismantled by Denmark left a bad taste in the mouth, as does the style of play in general, but I still think the achievements are decent.
If we had achieved the same thing over the last two campaigns, but done that with a more attractive style of football, would MON be getting the same amount of criticism? I doubt it to be honest.
With an international manager, all he can do is make the most of the resources at his disposal, and, with the exception of how he has used (and not used) Hoolahan, I'm not convinced that any other way of playing would have brought about greater achievements. With our players, I think that qualification itself is a success, and I don't much care how it's achieved. Failure to qualify with our players doesn't automatically mean the manager has failed either, in my opinion.
My main criticism of O'Neill is that he is overly defensive in games where he shouldn't be, and that loses us points that a less conservative set-up might have earned. But over the course of a campaign, we haven't done worse that I would have expected us to do.
Overall, I think O'Neill's achievements have been decent. the 2016 Euros: Qualification for the finals and then getting out of the group - could we really have expected any better?
Even in the last campaign, we qualified for the playoffs - could we really have expected to top the group ahead of Serbia, Wales, and Austria? Certainly, being so utterly dismantled by Denmark left a bad taste in the mouth, as does the style of play in general, but I still think the achievements are decent.
If we had achieved the same thing over the last two campaigns, but done that with a more attractive style of football, would MON be getting the same amount of criticism? I doubt it to be honest.
With an international manager, all he can do is make the most of the resources at his disposal, and, with the exception of how he has used (and not used) Hoolahan, I'm not convinced that any other way of playing would have brought about greater achievements. With our players, I think that qualification itself is a success, and I don't much care how it's achieved. Failure to qualify with our players doesn't automatically mean the manager has failed either, in my opinion.
My main criticism of O'Neill is that he is overly defensive in games where he shouldn't be, and that loses us points that a less conservative set-up might have earned. But over the course of a campaign, we haven't done worse that I would have expected us to do.

Comment