Martin O'Neill and Roy Keane

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SwanVsDalton
    Seasoned Pro
    • Oct 2006
    • 3312

    #1156
    Originally posted by ifk101
    Adaptability and flexibility are desirable but what exactly are we adapting from? Trapattoni's strength was our defined game plan, players knew their roles and what was expected of them. His failing was an inability to adapt and to evolve his game plan. There was no plan B so to speak. There is a sense we are rudderless under MON, that we don't have a plan A to build on.
    I disagree. It's hasn't come off all the time so far, but I can see more purposeful play under O'Neill than we did over the last couple of years under Trapattoni. We play it a bit more on the deck, even if we often revert to type and give it a hoof (ie against Scotland).

    I'd like to see that develop into a more tangible brand of identity but I don't think it's unfair for a manager to still be working on that. As I said, only elite teams can do this quickly unless they go for the rigid Trapattoni special.

    For now, I'll take the uncertainty of MONs flexible approach.
    Ou-est le Centre George Pompidou?

    Comment

    • TheOneWhoKnocks
      Banned
      • Dec 2013
      • 5244

      #1157
      I am a pragmatist and a realist.

      I don't equate acquiring a passport to become eligible to play competitive Intl. football with embracing your heritage or having an affinity to the country you declare for.

      I am sure Deco, Emmanuel Olisadebe and Eduardo had an affinity with Portugal, Poland and Croatia after they declared but it doesn't have much to do with what I'm saying TBCH.

      Anyways, I appreciate Christie's honesty in a way. And on the basis of that one game, he has potential.

      How times change! I remember Zat Knight saying virtually the same thing as Christie and people were firmly against his call up; this was ten odd years ago.

      Comment

      • OwlsFan
        Capped Player
        • Feb 2005
        • 10535

        #1158
        Originally posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
        How times change! I remember Zat Knight saying virtually the same thing as Christie and people were firmly against his call up; this was ten odd years ago.
        You remember that as a 9 year old? Fair dues.
        Forget about the performance or entertainment. It's only the result that matters.

        Comment

        • DannyInvincible
          Capped Player
          • Sep 2006
          • 11521

          #1159
          Originally posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
          I don't equate acquiring a passport to become eligible to play competitive Intl. football with embracing your heritage or having an affinity to the country you declare for.
          Well, whatever might or might not constitute an affinity with Ireland for you - who are you to dictate anyway? - it's unfair for you to so presumptuously dismiss the notion that Christie might have such an affinity and an appreciation for his Irish heritage when you don't even know the guy and have heard wind of a grand total of one or two interviews with him. Why do you think it's reasonable to jump to such conclusions? Even if he did have f*ck all affinity for Ireland, you don't have enough information available to you to know.

          I am sure Deco, Emmanuel Olisadebe and Eduardo had an affinity with Portugal, Poland and Croatia after they declared but it doesn't have much to do with what I'm saying TBCH.
          So what are you saying? As a pragmatist?

          How times change! I remember Zat Knight saying virtually the same thing as Christie and people were firmly against his call up; this was ten odd years ago.
          But Knight never declared. He spent his career wavering, didn't he? Christie made his decision quickly and is committed to us. That has to count for something.
          My blog.
          FIFA Player Eligibility in the Context of Ireland: The Actual Rules, the Real Facts and Dispelling the Prevailing Myths.

          Comment

          • tricky_colour
            International Prospect
            • Sep 2003
            • 8886

            #1160
            Originally posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
            I am a pragmatist and a realist.

            I don't equate acquiring a passport to become eligible to play competitive Intl. football with embracing your heritage or having an affinity to the country you declare for.

            I am sure Deco, Emmanuel Olisadebe and Eduardo had an affinity with Portugal, Poland and Croatia after they declared but it doesn't have much to do with what I'm saying TBCH.

            Anyways, I appreciate Christie's honesty in a way. And on the basis of that one game, he has potential.

            How times change! I remember Zat Knight saying virtually the same thing as Christie and people were firmly against his call up; this was ten odd years ago.
            There is no requirement to "embracing your heritage or have an affinity" with any particular country,
            all that is required is to be eligible under the rules, and there is nothing in the rules about either.

            Indeed to slightly contradict my self there, he is embracing his heritage by declaring for
            the country of his ancestors, so all you are left with is "having an affinity" and I might have
            an affinity with India due to a love of chicken vindaloo, but should that be enough to make
            me eligible?
            Last edited by tricky_colour; 20/11/2014, 7:08 PM.

            Comment

            • TheOneWhoKnocks
              Banned
              • Dec 2013
              • 5244

              #1161
              He said that his reasons for declaring were a higher chance of first team football and less players ahead of him in the pecking order. That's straight from the horses mouth. And there is no rule bending here. He is eligible under the rules but let's please not try and justify it and act like there was anything else factoring in his reasoning other than professional reasons.

              I'm not enamoured with it TBH. I would rather Irish players and players that feel Irish to play for Ireland and I'm not the only one. Indeed fans aren't the only ones (Cunningham, Harte, Kitson, Barton, Kerr) all have the same viewpoint as me and all, Barton aside, have spoken eloquently on the matter. Let's respect each others viewpoints, eh?

              It's not up to me though, bottom line, so as long as the boy has talent and application - that's all you can ask for.

              Comment

              • tricky_colour
                International Prospect
                • Sep 2003
                • 8886

                #1162
                Originally posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
                He said that his reasons for declaring were a higher chance of first team football and less players ahead of him in the pecking order. That's straight from the horses mouth. And there is no rule bending here. He is eligible under the rules but let's please not try and justify it and act like there was anything else factoring in his reasoning other than professional reasons.

                I'm not enamoured with it TBH. I would rather Irish players and players that feel Irish to play for Ireland and I'm not the only one. Indeed fans aren't the only ones (Cunningham, Harte, Kitson, Barton, Kerr) all have the same viewpoint as me and all, Barton aside, have spoken eloquently on the matter. Let's respect each others viewpoints, eh?

                It's not up to me though, bottom line, so as long as the boy has talent and application - that's all you can ask for.
                The fact is he is eligible there are too players who are eligible who do not want to play for career reasons.

                He said he was delighted to pull on the shirt.


                Have you got a link to the relevant article?
                Last edited by tricky_colour; 20/11/2014, 7:47 PM.

                Comment

                • Stuttgart88
                  Capped Player
                  • May 2004
                  • 18973

                  #1163
                  I think there us a bit of wordsmithery going on. Afaik he was asked when the call came and he answered that when it did he had no hesitation because his chances of playing were good and this was a real incentive. So, yes, a high likelihood of playing made it attractive. That's not to say other factors don't make it attractive too. I think too much is read in to relatively inarticulate people having a mike stuffed in their face.

                  I see TOWK's point but I think it's exaggerated. Here is a good player, very happy to be involved, committed immediately and as eligible as many others. At first glance he looks better than Doherty but Doherty will still get his chance if he and Wolves continue to do well.

                  Comment

                  • tetsujin1979
                    Coach
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 23730

                    #1164
                    Originally posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
                    I am a pragmatist and a realist.

                    I don't equate acquiring a passport to become eligible to play competitive Intl. football with embracing your heritage or having an affinity to the country you declare for.

                    I am sure Deco, Emmanuel Olisadebe and Eduardo had an affinity with Portugal, Poland and Croatia after they declared but it doesn't have much to do with what I'm saying TBCH.

                    Anyways, I appreciate Christie's honesty in a way. And on the basis of that one game, he has potential.

                    How times change! I remember Zat Knight saying virtually the same thing as Christie and people were firmly against his call up; this was ten odd years ago.
                    How do you resolve the conflicts between the those two ideologies?
                    All goals, yellow and red cards tweeted in real time on mastodon, BlueSky and facebook

                    Comment

                    • tricky_colour
                      International Prospect
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 8886

                      #1165

                      On the decision to snub England's advances for Ireland, the Coventry-born defender commented:
                      'I always knew about the Irish connection and it was one that I wanted to do.'

                      'England under-21s were in touch with me at the same time but Ireland was the best option for me.'

                      I came over (to Dublin) when I was younger. I can't really remember much about it but I was over when I was younger. She lives in England now but some of my family are over here. They live not far from here (Malahide)."Yeah, I always knew about the Irish connection and it was one that I wanted to do.
                      So that is quite clear, it is in the past tense, he don't say "it is the one I want to do now", he
                      said "that is the one I wanted to do".

                      Anyhow he is happy with his decision which he describes as a "no brainer", I am happy with it
                      too as is MON OK, maybe TOWK is not so happy, but as the saying goes:-

                      You can please some of the people some of the time, all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time but you can never please all of the people all of the time.

                      Comment

                      • DannyInvincible
                        Capped Player
                        • Sep 2006
                        • 11521

                        #1166
                        Originally posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
                        He said that his reasons for declaring were a higher chance of first team football and less players ahead of him in the pecking order.
                        He spoke of contributing factors. He didn't say those reasons were to the exclusion of all others. Stop being disingenuous by again attempting to suggest he said something he quite obviously didn't. The distinction can't be that difficult to grasp? Just because those were two factors in his decision, it doesn't mean there can't have been any other contributory factors and just because he didn't mention other reasons to your satisfaction doesn't mean you can fill in the significant gaps in your knowledge by jumping to rash conclusions. Thing is, as tricky highlights above, he did mention his Irish roots as being a contributing factor anyway.

                        Are you really a pragmatist? You struck me as more of an unforgiving purist.
                        My blog.
                        FIFA Player Eligibility in the Context of Ireland: The Actual Rules, the Real Facts and Dispelling the Prevailing Myths.

                        Comment

                        • gastric
                          First Team
                          • Aug 2010
                          • 2327

                          #1167
                          Originally posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
                          I am a pragmatist and a realist.

                          I don't equate acquiring a passport to become eligible to play competitive Intl. football with embracing your heritage or having an affinity to the country you declare for.

                          I am sure Deco, Emmanuel Olisadebe and Eduardo had an affinity with Portugal, Poland and Croatia after they declared but it doesn't have much to do with what I'm saying TBCH.

                          Anyways, I appreciate Christie's honesty in a way. And on the basis of that one game, he has potential.

                          How times change! I remember Zat Knight saying virtually the same thing as Christie and people were firmly against his call up; this was ten odd years ago.

                          You are more delusional than anything else and YBIG might be a better forum for you. I now await the pained martyr reply of no one loves me or understands me!

                          Comment

                          • DeLorean
                            Capped Player
                            • Jun 2008
                            • 10894

                            #1168
                            Originally posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
                            I am a pragmatist and a realist.
                            Originally posted by TheOneWhoKnocks
                            I'm not enamoured with it TBH. I would rather Irish players and players that feel Irish to play for Ireland and I'm not the only one.
                            So you're actually an idealist!

                            You call yourself a pragmatist and then say you're not enamoured with a decision that's the absolute definition of pragmatism.

                            Comment

                            • DannyInvincible
                              Capped Player
                              • Sep 2006
                              • 11521

                              #1169
                              Originally posted by OwlsFan
                              You remember that as a 9 year old? Fair dues.
                              Is TOWK actually 19? I thought he was about 12!
                              My blog.
                              FIFA Player Eligibility in the Context of Ireland: The Actual Rules, the Real Facts and Dispelling the Prevailing Myths.

                              Comment

                              • DeLorean
                                Capped Player
                                • Jun 2008
                                • 10894

                                #1170
                                Roberto responds...

                                Comment

                                Working...