Player eligibility row

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • seanfhear
    Banned
    • Dec 2007
    • 5452

    #166
    It is time to return to one team representing the Island of Ireland. We do not have all this aggro with the Rugby team as to who plays for who.

    With one team representing Ireland all this aggro about who plays for who will go away.

    Comment

    • Mr_Parker
      First Team
      • May 2005
      • 1191

      #167
      Originally posted by geysir
      As a proof of identity, just as Mr.P wrote.
      Indeed but they just won't listen. I gave a list of all FIFA documents because to understand and follow this whole debate you need to read many of them and indeed FIFA Circulars too. You can't just cherry pick one.

      Comment

      • Mr_Parker
        First Team
        • May 2005
        • 1191

        #168
        Originally posted by Nedser
        True, but I notice that particular excerpt is entitled "Verification of the Players’ Identities" - is there by any chance a separate section regarding verifying players' eligibility for a team? It's very curious that they insist on a passport rather than some other government-issued ID document, e.g. Driving Licence. Generally speaking, you only need to produce a passport when you have to prove your nationality as well as identity.
        The reason a passport is used is because it is a internationally recognised document. Driving Licences etc are not.

        Originally posted by Nedser

        Anyway, the fact remains that Tony Cascarino claims he had to get an Irish passport or would no longer be eligible, and even Mr Parker mentioned that FIFA were trying to insist the NI players hold British passports a few years ago. As such, even though it's not stated in that particular rule, there is evidence that FIFA have used passports to verify players' nationality. And common sense alone will tell you that FIFA would require some sort of proof of nationality, I simply don't believe they just make the assumption that players are eligible unless someone objects.
        You are mistaken. I stated that it was the IFA who tried to insist on British Passports. It was FIFA's intervention at the request of the Irish Government that clarified the situation. As for your "common sense" arguement, I suggest you read through the documents I supplied in the link. You will see that the onus is on the national associations to ensure eligibility, not FIFA to ensure it. Only if this is challanged by opponents eligibilty needs proved. Try this years World Cup regs as an example.

        Comment

        • EalingGreen
          Seasoned Pro
          • Aug 2006
          • 3719

          #169
          Originally posted by Noelys Guitar
          Why should we stop recruiting Irish born players? And listen to the Linfield 'fans' at tonights match against St Pats. No hope for these people. Rule Britannia against St Pats. Phythonesque stuff. You could hear the English commentator starting to cringe.
          What has an eligibility dispute between the IFA and FAI (the subject of this thread, incidentally) got to do with the behaviour of a section of the fans of a club?
          You might deplore such behaviour, as I do, but it is hardly illegal. Nor is it any different in essence from eg the behaviour of some of the ROI support in and around the Israel game a couple of years back (Remember the thread "Tonight I was Ashamed to be Irish"?).
          Or, in order to be consistent, would you contend that players should also not represent ROI?

          Comment

          • third policeman
            First Team
            • Jun 2008
            • 1208

            #170
            Originally posted by seanfhear
            It is time to return to one team representing the Island of Ireland. We do not have all this aggro with the Rugby team as to who plays for who.

            With one team representing Ireland all this aggro about who plays for who will go away.
            Completely agree and I sense that the overwhelming majority of people North and South might also regard this a sensible and acceptable way forward. NI simply cannot compell players to play for them against their will, and dont seem to understand that it is increasingly unlikely that nationalists from the North will choose to play for a team that represents a state (and a football / cultural entity) that still has difficulty recognising their identity and heritage. Of course the idea of an All Ireland team may seem equally unpalatable to some Northern Unionists, but there is a difference. The Irish football team (like the Rugby team) would not be representing any specific political or national jurisdiction. It should be neutral and inclusive of both states, in a way that the NI team has failed to establish a neutrality / inclusiveness with respect to its constituent traditions.

            We need to diffuse the increasingly ugly and sectarian edge to international football in Ireland. What depresses me more than anything is the way that both national jersey's are being worn in the North as emblems of political and sectarian affiliation.

            I know from previous threads that this will provoke EG and GR into apoplectic rage, but after GFF we need to be pragmatic and imaginative in the way that tradiitions are recognised in Ireland and spaces created where traditional loyalties and animosities can be broken down. Of course NI's existence is guaranteed under GFF (so long as a majority up there want it) and that should entitle them to a national football team, but life and relationships are more complicated than that. The fact that Unionism has established the legitimacy of its political position, might actually be an argument in favour of a bit of give in the area of sport, especially as the current position is in danger of proving unsustainable.

            Comment

            • kingdomkerry
              Reserves
              • Aug 2007
              • 856

              #171
              Why did Neil Lennon quit international football?

              Comment

              • ArdeeBhoy
                International Prospect
                • Jun 2007
                • 6237

                #172
                Originally posted by third policeman
                Completely agree and I sense that the overwhelming majority of people North and South might also regard this a sensible and acceptable way forward. NI simply cannot compell players to play for them against their will, and dont seem to understand that it is increasingly unlikely that nationalists from the North will choose to play for a team that represents a state (and a football / cultural entity) that still has difficulty recognising their identity and heritage. Of course the idea of an All Ireland team may seem equally unpalatable to some Northern Unionists, but there is a difference. The Irish football team (like the Rugby team) would not be representing any specific political or national jurisdiction. It should be neutral and inclusive of both states, in a way that the NI team has failed to establish a neutrality / inclusiveness with respect to its constituent traditions.

                We need to diffuse the increasingly ugly and sectarian edge to international football in Ireland. What depresses me more than anything is the way that both national jersey's are being worn in the North as emblems of political and sectarian affiliation.

                I know from previous threads that this will provoke EG and GR into apoplectic rage, but after GFF we need to be pragmatic and imaginative in the way that tradiitions are recognised in Ireland and spaces created where traditional loyalties and animosities can be broken down. Of course NI's existence is guaranteed under GFF (so long as a majority up there want it) and that should entitle them to a national football team, but life and relationships are more complicated than that. The fact that Unionism has established the legitimacy of its political position, might actually be an argument in favour of a bit of give in the area of sport, especially as the current position is in danger of proving unsustainable.
                Sensible response but likely to upset usual paranoid suspects, who just want a team for their own convenience.

                And kk, presume not a serious question. If it is, rather than adding to the repetition on here, Google it....

                Comment

                • SkStu
                  Capped Player
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 14863

                  #173
                  Originally posted by EalingGreen
                  What has an eligibility dispute between the IFA and FAI (the subject of this thread, incidentally) got to do with the behaviour of a section of the fans of a club?
                  if you cannot see the connect then you should expect a few more Gibsons, Wilsons etc in the coming years.
                  I like high energy football. A little bit rock and roll. Many finishes instead of waiting for the perfect one.

                  Comment

                  • stiffler
                    Reserves
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 282

                    #174
                    If you are born in the island of Ireland, then you should be allowed to play for Ireland IMO

                    Comment

                    • lopez
                      Seasoned Pro
                      • Nov 2002
                      • 2900

                      #175
                      Originally posted by ArdeeBhoy
                      To be fair Senor, think he was being ironic?

                      And response re.Tuesday noted.
                      Ooops! Good example that you should read all the posts on a thread.
                      This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!

                      Comment

                      • lopez
                        Seasoned Pro
                        • Nov 2002
                        • 2900

                        #176
                        Originally posted by EalingGreen
                        What has an eligibility dispute between the IFA and FAI (the subject of this thread, incidentally) got to do with the behaviour of a section of the fans of a club?
                        You might deplore such behaviour, as I do, but it is hardly illegal. Nor is it any different in essence from eg the behaviour of some of the ROI support in and around the Israel game a couple of years back (Remember the thread "Tonight I was Ashamed to be Irish"?).
                        Or, in order to be consistent, would you contend that players should also not represent ROI?
                        If things were as bad as you are trying to make out - which they weren't - I'd excuse any Jewish Irishman who would want to play for/or support Israel instead. Does that satisfy your question?

                        Fact is a bunch of nazis - I know you don't have any racists or anti-semites in Unionist O6C - doesn't compare with a concerted campaign against players of a certain religion and/or views on the political destiny of Northern Ireland and/or football club in Scotland.
                        This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!

                        Comment

                        • ifk101
                          Seasoned Pro
                          • May 2003
                          • 3961

                          #177
                          Interview with Patrick Nelson, IFA


                          Favourite quote in that video is; "we want Fifa to uphold their own statutes as we read them".

                          Comment

                          • lopez
                            Seasoned Pro
                            • Nov 2002
                            • 2900

                            #178
                            Originally posted by ifk101
                            Interview with Patrick Nelson, IFA


                            Favourite quote in that video is; "we want Fifa to uphold their own statutes as we read them".
                            Is he a 'plastic' or a 'Maik Taylor'? Might even be EG.

                            Feeling they are being treated unfairly compared with other associations. Nurse? My sides! How many other associations can get to approach players that have moved to another 'country'? If he wants to protect his investment - sounds like he's talking about Chicken George and Kunta Kinte rather than a young footballer - then get FIFA to change the rules.
                            This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!

                            Comment

                            • Razors left peg
                              International Prospect
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 6292

                              #179
                              Originally posted by ifk101
                              Interview with Patrick Nelson, IFA


                              Favourite quote in that video is; "we want Fifa to uphold their own statutes as we read them".
                              Did the IFA tell Tony Kane that they didnt want him because he had already played for the Republic under 21s or do they only want to stop players going one way?
                              Last edited by Razors left peg; 28/02/2010, 9:01 PM.
                              Its really not that complicated!!!

                              Comment

                              • TrapAPony
                                First Team
                                • Dec 2009
                                • 1603

                                #180
                                Originally posted by Razors left peg
                                Did the IFA tell Michael Kane that they didnt want him because he had already played for the Republic under 21s or do they only want to stop players going one way?
                                Tony


                                Marc Wilson today insisted that the players should be allowed decide whether they want to
                                play for the North or us. 100% agree with you Marc.

                                BBC, Sport, BBC Sport, bbc.co.uk, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service
                                Last edited by TrapAPony; 28/02/2010, 8:22 PM.
                                "We lost because we didn't win"- Ronaldo

                                Comment

                                Working...