I'm struggling to see how my post could be perceived as me masquerading as Stephen Ireland in disguise.
I called the story how I saw it, a non event. Yet its the classic non event that the SI dissenters will use to jump on the bandwagon to vent and rant about him.
What car he drives or whether he smokes shisha (which again I re-iterate is a perfectly legal exploit, yet the dissenters here would have you believe it's class A) is none of my concern.
He played for us for 6 games. I thought on the whole he did very well in those 6 games. He doesn't play for us anymore. His decision and that's fair enough, I accept that, there was no contract binding him to play for Ireland. I think people need to realise this and get over it, he certainly has.



Quote
), however, is a bit too dictatorial for my liking. It's selfish on our parts. Our kids are our responsibility and the responsibility of those entrusted with their care as a public duty; they're not Stephen Ireland's responsibility. Nobody is forced to follow him on Twitter nor is anyone forced to read the rags disguising as newspapers that document the minute and inconsequential details of footballers' private lives on a daily basis. He isn't doing anything illegal/immoral, nor does he owe kids up and down the country some sort of moral guidance or whatever it is certain people think footballers owe us as our apparent role models. He's just being a narcissistic eejit; big deal... Who cares?




Bookmarks