QuoteBecause he also supports it.Originally Posted by GavinZac
Ask yourself... if this was a genuine stick to beat the government with, do you not think the opposition parties would be doing so? Why is it, if its apparantly "all bad", Mr Kenny is more worried about one man's finance than our status in our economic bloc?
Your Chairperson,
Gavin
Membership Advisory Board
"Ex Bardus , Vicis"
Because he also supports it.
I don't get this 'the yes/no side haven't convinced me' attitude.
Why is it they're job to convince you?
This is something that will affect you, and your life, surely it's your own responsibility to inform yourself and make a decision based on the treaty itself?
After all if you(and people in general) make the wrong decision it's you that will suffer
And the only party leader/party that doesnt support it is Sinn Fein. Would you vote for them, yeah?Because he also supports it.
Your Chairperson,
Gavin
Membership Advisory Board
"Ex Bardus , Vicis"
You're voting on a referendum, not an election.
I know that. However, you seemed annoyed at the opposition parties for going along with the government. The only party not supporting it is Sinn Fein, so I'm asking are you a Sinn Fein voter? Not because "its an election" but because political parties tend to reflect their voter's opinions.
You're voting on a referendum, not an election.
Have you read about the treaty yet?
Your Chairperson,
Gavin
Membership Advisory Board
"Ex Bardus , Vicis"
The opposition parties always support EU referendums. Even the Greens are supporting this one. The fact that SF have recognised what it is and are opposing it, makes no difference to my vote.
As more countries join it makes the Union impossible to run if everyone retains vetoes. Vetoes need to be given up to enable a more efficient decision making process.
No they don't. I remember the opposition raising the point of the Rapid Response Force in the original Nice referendum. The Irish people made it known they agreed with them and voted against it. The treaty was re-written to provide assurances for Ireland's position, and both sides were then happy to endorse the revised treaty. It then passed under its new form.
What way did you vote in those, by the way? Would you generally consider yourself cynical towards the EU? I ask because I havent actually seen all that much of an argument coming from you, beyond a seemingly set dislike of the manner this is being processed.
Your Chairperson,
Gavin
Membership Advisory Board
"Ex Bardus , Vicis"
FF, FG, Labour, and the PD's all supported the original Nice Treaty, as I did. This is a different kettle of fish entirely, an undemocratic jokeshop, which involves handing up aspects of our sovereignty to Brussels. The yes side say it's just a few cosmetic changes involved, yet only one country is permitted to hold a referendum, and that's only on a constitutional requirement, and it's one of the areas we'll have to give up, if it passes. The surrender of our sovereignty to me is a red line area, as we've been ruled by foreign states for long enough, and so the referendum cannot be supported in any form.
Yes you have to read it to come up with your own view, however (as this thread shows) the treaty's are always open to interpretation and aren't black and white. This is where the issue of being convinced about the merits or otherwise. Loss of power v greater efficiency for example is something that has to be debated and can't be just garnered from the Treaty.
In my opinion we're starting from a position what we have we hold, and it's up for the yes side to convince me/ give me garantee's of the effect of the losses will mean to make me want to change what we already have.
So far it seems to amount to some laughable (coming as it does from the Governing parties and their attitude to the working classes/ poor in this country) nonsense about taking care of the assession states; and about how Ireland would look if we vote no after everything they have done for us.
Nice 1 showed that the Government is capable of closing off issues that the people aren't happy with, so if people aren't happy with aspects of this treaty they should vote no and the Government can renegotiate it so it is acceptable to the people.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
No, you're not getting it. Its not about our image or reputation, or specifically about the poor souls in hungary. its about ourselves and everybody losing those benefits we have outlined, either by our forced exclusion from what is a member's club that we have no automatic right to be in or entitlement to benefit from, or the benefits that would be lost by the ever decreasingly efficient EU which already suffers from accusations of sluggish bureaucracy. We have a choice: rectify the position that we were in whereby these sort of controls were set in stone/ink for a certain size of the EU, or risk losing the single most important politico-economic development in the history of our continent and shared culture.
Your Chairperson,
Gavin
Membership Advisory Board
"Ex Bardus , Vicis"
That's pure scare mongering. We weren't thrown out after Nice 1, we won't be if we vote no to Lisbon. We'll get the necessary concessions, or a more coherent argument that will get it through in the future (as that's how our democracy works in terms of referenda).
As I said in the post, there is a debate to be had on loss of power versus greater EU efficiency. But frankly, that'll be lost in the waffle of nonsense like we'll be thrown out of the EU if we vote no.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
*sigh* yes it will be lost if thats what you're focusing on. We won't, in my opinion, be thrown out of the EU if we vote no; but the attitude that the EU is only for our benefit and ridiculous attitude that we can take it or leave it, is what I was getting at, rather than any expulsion. There seems to be an almost flippant disrespect toward our Union partners because everybody has grown up with the EU simply being a bottomless bucket of cash while we focus on internal matters - Very easy to do as an island nation who's inhabitants exposure to our EU partners rarely goes beyond the beach colonies or going on the **** in Prague. The crucial matter is, will it be worth being part of the EU if we vote no? I don't know.
Last edited by GavinZac; 18/02/2008 at 2:31 PM.
Your Chairperson,
Gavin
Membership Advisory Board
"Ex Bardus , Vicis"
GavinZac, I'm not going to tell you again: drop the condescending smart-assed attitude or stay out of CA.
Wait, how am I the one being smart arsed and condescending? In just one post above from a poster that has spent the entire thread misrepresenting and being condescending toward my points, the comments on my arguments wereAnd a sigh of frustration at this is somehow worse?scare mongering ... (We'll get) a more coherent argument.... waffle of nonsense
Your Chairperson,
Gavin
Membership Advisory Board
"Ex Bardus , Vicis"
They're not serial offenders. You've been stirring the crap on here for weeks now. And this isn't the place to discuss it. I'm not going to tell you again.
I think Gavin's raising an important point here that seems to be lost in the discussion. There has to be a reasonable trade off between national sovereignty and short term self interest and the interest of the Union as a whole. The decision making stuctures become increasingly ineffective in a larger Union.
I have not made up my mind on how to vote yet. I am yet to recieve any unbiased information on the subject and, for me, this is crucial. I'm not sideing with parties, I'll go with what I see as best for Ireland.
Extratime.ie
Yo te quiero, mi querida. Sin tus besos, yo soy nada.
Abri o portão de ouro, da maquina do tempo.
Mi mamá me hizo guapo, listo y antimadridista.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks