Also, and apologies if it's off-topic, but I have a question on the 'haircuts' demanded by NAMA.
It seems to me that most banks expected NAMA to request discounts of 28% (or close to it) but NAMA looked for discounts of up to 50% from some banks, including Anglo. This was publicised at the time as a sign of how serious NAMA were about the task in front of them.
But as I understand it, the amount the banks needed was calculated (at least partly) on the understanding that they would be asked for a 28% 'haircut', so by asking for 50%, all that happens is that they need to be recapitalised again later, to make up the funds shortfall caused by the extra 20% that NAMA asked for.
So was NAMA asking for 50% just for show?
Or am I drastically reducing the complexity of the NAMA deals?
Bookmarks