When a team is down to 10 men, the other team have to nominate a player (it's usually the keeper) who will not take a penalty in the shoot out.
Sorry if this is the wrong place for this
Say you are playing in the World Cup and you just made your 3rd substitution. The game is 0-0 in the 119th minute and one of your guys breaks his leg and can't even walk.
Say the penalties go into the 10th round and your keeper just scored. Would your next shooter be the 1st shooter for your team or technically would that 11th guy - never having really been substituted - technically have to shoot?
My Guarantee
Am looking for old Irish matches on VHS, PM me if you have some and I'll upload them here
Not exactly the same thing but I remember the Netherlands - England match at the U21 Euro's where Steven Taylor got injured in extra time but completed the 120 minutes. The team had used all of their subs and even though Taylor's mobility was terrible they left him out there as an extra body to get in the way. Because he completed the game he had to then take a peno, I think the Dutch manager started kicking up a stink as Taylor tried to leave the pitch when the shoot-out started. England weren't too happy about it but he scored anyway.
I think it finished 12-11 with Arnold Kruiswijk missing both of his pens.
As tetsujin said though, if a team does actually go down to 10 men then the other team will drop someone from their list for the shoot-out... which makes my story a total waste of time![]()
You'd have read it in the match programme when I did the You are the Ref column.
A team with ten players has to nominate one player to not take part in the entire shoot out. So if you choose your keeper, he can't face the penalties.
My Guarantee
Am looking for old Irish matches on VHS, PM me if you have some and I'll upload them here
I may as well ask this here:
Does the number 1 shirt have to be worn by a goalkeeper?
No as the substitute 'keeper player will have a different number.
In Agentina '78, Peru did not want to use the number 13. So were allowed by FIFA to use no 23 for their second 'keeper. He was never used though. ( I think tournament and country are correct).
You question raises a question from me.
If an outfield player replaces a goalkeeper ( for whatever reason). His colours need to change from the outfield players. But should he borrow the 'keepers jersey as that changes his number also?
" I'll go right up to here,
it can't possibly hurt.
All they will find is my
beer and my shirt."
Last match of the season and Man City needed to win to get into the UEFA Cup. City brought on their sub keeper for an outfield player, put him in goals and stuck David James up front as a target man. He had an outfield jersey on with James 1 on the back. Stuart Pearce had it printed up beforehand.
So no, an outfielder can wear the number 1 jersey.
Didn't some international team number their players alphabetically in some tournament so an outfield player was assigned #1?
We're not arrogant, we're just better.
lads, derek riordan is now wearing number one for hibs after moving back from celtic, so strange looking!
I kid you not!
Havin a weekend away is quite frankly,lettin ur team mates down!
Dont mean to be pedantic but Ardiles wore #2 in 78. It was in 82 that he wore #1.
But yes you are correct that they were numbered alphabetically, except for Diego Armando.
Funnily enough England did the same in 82 with the exception of the goalkeepers and Kevin Keegan.
"Football is a game you play with your brain".
Bookmarks