2011 Presidential Election

[Spudulika]

Love to see some sections of the media going hell for leather after the SF candidate. If anything Martin's entry into the race is perfect for cleansing him and the party to a large degree to make them more voter friendly in the general election next year. I don't like MDH but he's a lock to win. The undemocratic way in which David Norris has gone about things with his luvvy friends in the meeja looking to get him in there - in order to have something to write about - is a shame. I still respect him for his previous great work in preserving (or fighting to preserve) Irish historical and heritage sites, but his ego has over stepped the mark. I'm still wondering what this final nail in his coffin will be. Am I completely wrong on this or was there a 3rd scandal to come?

[Mr A]

A lot of the commentary around this election since McGuinness entered leaves me absolutely bewildered.

Just taking the above as an example- McGuinness was a member of an organization that with little electoral support brought death, violence, torture, extortion and fear, and achieved little but to re-enforce the polarised nature of our island. He did not recognise our courts, police or army. It's great that the violence has stopped- it really is, but I think those that never resorted to it deserve more credit than those who took decades to realise it wasn't really achieving anything.

But Norris is undemocratic?

I also find it bizarre that when people attack McGuinness they are dismissed as attacking the peace process or some such. Usually when this happens the counter attack is that people 'have an agenda' or are 'against the peace process', but I haven't seen people refute the actual claims made against him. To me the whole point of the SF campaign is to sanitise and legitimise their role in the troubles- hence McGuinness took part in street battles against the British Army, but the bulk of what the IRA spent their time doing is conveniently ignored. Because only the other side did terrible things, and even when we did terrible things, they made us do it.

Sorry, but I'm not buying it.

[culloty82]

Mr A's hit the nail on the head - no-one's contesting Sinn Féin's right to run a candidate, and if it assists their move to the centre and attraction of middle-class voters, then the decision can only be welcomed. The selection of McGuinness though, was a backward step in that regard, as he was always going to overshadowed by his past activities, rather than choosing Caoimhín Ó Caoláin, for instance, who has no previous IRA association, and is perceived relatively well by the general public. SF may still overtake FF, and possibly Labour in the coming years, but they should be basing their strategy around Doherty, Toireasa Ferris and the younger, untainted generation, rather than harking back to Adams and McGuinness.

[geysir]

Sorry, but I'm not buying it.

In my experience when people say they are not buying such a such ideology, they usually buy or have already purchased some other equally or more implausible ideology.

I also find it bizarre that when people attack McGuinness they are dismissed as attacking the peace process or some such. Usually when this happens the counter attack is that people 'have an agenda' or are 'against the peace process',

What people are you referring to? everybody? all reaction to the attacks on the McGuinness chap? By attacks on McGuinness, do you mean all attacks? what happens on this thread? the selected suspects that the indo drags up? McDowell? Fine gael politicians? Gay Byrne? Fintan O Toole? who? which criticism? provide a link to it.
In order for rational debate please refrain from wild subjective generalisations

To me the whole point of the SF campaign is to sanitise and legitimise their role in the troubles- hence McGuinness took part in street battles against the British Army, but the bulk of what the IRA spent their time doing is conveniently ignored.

What you are ignoring is that Sinn Fein's role in the troubles was legitimized by current democratic standards, before, during and post GFA. That doesn´t mean that all aspects of the role were legit.
But if we are to examine the bulk of what the IRA spent their time doing,
then the counter argument is, if that is to happen, then plenty people want to know who organised the Monaghan / Dublin bombs, who armed the Loyalists, Stevens inquiry, etc etc. That's called a peace process in some parts of the of the world.

[Mr A]

In my experience when people say they are not buying such a such ideology, they usually buy or have already purchased some other equally or more implausible ideology.


What people are you referring to? everybody? all reaction to the attacks on the McGuinness chap? By attacks on McGuinness, do you mean all attacks? what happens on this thread? the selected suspects that the indo drags up? McDowell? Fine gael politicians? Gay Byrne? Fintan O Toole? who? which criticism? provide a link to it.
In order for rational debate please refrain from wild subjective generalisations



What you are ignoring is that Sinn Fein's role in the troubles was legitimized by current democratic standards, before, during and post GFA. That doesn´t mean that all aspects of the role were legit.
But if we are to examine the bulk of what the IRA spent their time doing,
then the counter argument is, if that is to happen, then plenty people want to know who organised the Monaghan / Dublin bombs, who armed the Loyalists, Stevens inquiry, etc etc. That's called a peace process in some parts of the of the world.

LOL at the bits in bold- brilliant stuff.

Let's go with the ones you mentioned. What did Gay Byrne, Fintan O'Toole or Michael McDowell say about McGuinness that was inaccurate or unfair?

As for the 'counter argument'- this is about the election, specifically about one candidates past. I don't see how those things are relevant. And yes, it would be good to have the truth on all things.

O'Toole http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...304412076.html
Byrne http://www.thejournal.ie/martin-mcgu...33168-Sep2011/
McDowell http://www.independent.ie/opinion/an...l-2886788.html

[TiocfaidhArmani]

I also find it bizarre that when people attack McGuinness they are dismissed as attacking the peace process or some such. Usually when this happens the counter attack is that people 'have an agenda' or are 'against the peace process', but I haven't seen people refute the actual claims made against him. To me the whole point of the SF campaign is to sanitise and legitimise their role in the troubles- hence McGuinness took part in street battles against the British Army, but the bulk of what the IRA spent their time doing is conveniently ignored. Because only the other side did terrible things, and even when we did terrible things, they made us do it.

Not sure if you were asleep during the conflict or didn't read newspapers but I think we were repeatedly reminded of what they did to the extent the loyalist campaign of terror against innocent Catholics was ignored by the West Brit media as McGuinness rightly called them.

I remember the story of the women whose handicapped son was murdered by the UVF. The kid pleaded with them that she wasn't a Catholic but such was the mental state of the kid he brought out her rosary beads obviously giving her away as a Catholic and he was executed despite me mentally disabled and lucky for his mother she survived somehow. If that was the IRA you would never hear the end of it and we would all know her name and her son. But it wasn't - it was an innocent Catholic murdered by loyalists so our media didn't give a hoot, it was all "IRA, IRA, IRA", so don't make me laugh as if our media hasn't examined them enough and what they did, they were overkill on it to the extent they didn't give a crap about the masses of innocent people who were randomly picked for murder on a near daily basis by sectarian gangs.

BTW here's the info on that murder I mentioned. Believe me if she was a victim of the IRA we'd all know of Sarah McClenaghan by name and her disabled son so spare me we've not examined what the IRA did. Laughable.

Sarah McClenaghan, a widowed mother, was the only Catholic on her street in the Oldpark Road section of Belfast. To supplement her meager benefit check, she rented a room to David Titterington, a Protestant. Her son David was 15. But due to a birth defect, he had the mind of a child of five.

It was still dark the morning her door was broken in by four UDA men - Trevor Hinton, Ronald Waller, James McCleave and T.J. Slavin - who demanded to know her religion. When the boarder, Titterington, tried to claim she was a Protestant, Waller took him to the attic, where he was beaten and burned with a cigarette lighter before he somehow managed to escape through a skylight.

Meanwhile, Hinton, the ranking UDA man, told young David to go upstairs and fetch a prayer-book. In his innocence, the boy returned with his mother's Catholic missal and her rosary beads as well. She was then stripped and raped twice in front of her son.
"I pleaded with them not to touch the boy, as he was retarded and looked so afraid," she later testified. The UDA men were unmoved. Her son was shot dead. Sarah McClenaghan survived three gunshot wounds to live with her horrible memories.
Which is why the IRA can never say never.

http://articles.philly.com/1994-09-0...ra-sinn-fein/2

[Macy]

If SF and it's supporters are falling into whataboutery, they've already failed imo. They're much better focussing on the peace process and our history of gunmen becoming estabilishment politicians rather than who's atrocities were worse.

[TiocfaidhArmani]

If SF and it's supporters are falling into whataboutery, they've already failed imo. They're much better focussing on the peace process and our history of gunmen becoming estabilishment politicians rather than who's atrocities were worse.

Can I just saying in case that's aimed at me, my post is not whataboutery but a direct challenge to the point made by 'Mr A' that we didn't examine enough what the IRA did. I disagree with that and think I made a valid point to back it up.

[Mr A]

My point is that the IRA stuff in a candidates past cannot be ignored or dismissed- it has to be dealt with.

Whether other parties to the troubles have been examined as well as they should is another matter entirely. In terms of the presidential election I don't really see how it's relevant.

[geysir]

LOL at the bits in bold- brilliant stuff.

Thank you.

Let's go with the ones you mentioned. What did Gay Byrne, Fintan O'Toole or Michael McDowell say about McGuinness that was inaccurate or unfair?

You are the one who was generalising about people who are attacking mcGuinness and generalising about the response to those generalised attacks.
You do your own research and bring clarity to your generalisations.
I have already commented on some of the criticism. You had the opportunity to reply that post.

As for the 'counter argument'- this is about the election, specifically about one candidates past. I don't see how those things are relevant. And yes, it would be good to have the truth on all things

You don't see where the counter argument is relevant?
How about, it's highly relevant in the context of the peace process in the 6 counties, just as Marty explained in Cork, which was printed in the Examiner, which I quoted here a couple of days ago. What happens in the revelation department of the troubles as to who done what, is highly relevant to the life not just in the 6 counties but in all the 32 counties.

[Lim till i die]

Let's go with the ones you mentioned. What did Gay Byrne, Fintan O'Toole or Michael McDowell say about McGuinness that was inaccurate or unfair?

It's the hypocrisy that the establishment meeja are trotting out in their blind panic that is sticking in a lot of peoples craws, not necessarily the truthfullness or not of what they're saying (although McDowell told uncostested lies on The Frontline as far as I'm aware.)

These boys:




Were far better boys at coming in from the cold and not rocking the gravy boat and as such got a far nicer ride from our betters.

As for the 'counter argument'- this is about the election, specifically about one candidates past. I don't see how those things are relevant. And yes, it would be good to have the truth on all things.

This is a disengenuous line of argument being put about by anti-Shinner people at the moment to try and make themselves look like the most reasonable people in the world.

Were you on here screaming about Gilmore and Rabbite and Lynch and Sherlock and McManus and De Rossa etc, etc when they were going for election to the Dail (for positions with far more power than the President has??)

Were you ****.

The best thing the O'Reillys' and RTE's of the world could do at the moment is call off their attack dogs as the worse it gets the more it will stick in peoples craws. I didn't by the Sindo yesterday for the good of my sanity but for the second week running, Sean O'Rourke on TWIP was a rabid, screaming, disgraceful, mess.

[Mr A]

Genuinely not aware of any of them having been being paramilitaries though? The Stickies have been pretty inactive since way before my time.

[Lim till i die]

Genuinely not aware of any of them having been being paramilitaries though? .

Willing to take their word for it but not the Shinners?

Some of the people mentioned above had very tasty family members at the very least.

There's a lot of questions to be asked there undoubtedly.

Were they (or will they ever be) asked to the same degree and with the same vitriol as they've been asked of the Provos?

Course not.

The Stickies have been pretty inactive since way before my time

The Stickies are still active in pockets! Never even decommishioned

Neatly raises the issue of when it's ok to allow evil state subverting terrorists in out of the cold though. Is there a set time limit??

[bennocelt]

Imagine giving us a link to Creep McDowell and trying to have a serious rational debate! What did Harris say this weekend by the way?

[Mr A]

One more time: Did he say something inaccurate in that article?

[bennocelt]

Sorry but i wont be reading anything he has to say - or any other of the freaks in the irish indo. Does celia larkin and dee o willie still write for that newspaper?

[mypost]

My point is that the IRA stuff in a candidates past cannot be ignored or dismissed- it has to be dealt with.

Whether other parties to the troubles have been examined as well as they should is another matter entirely. In terms of the presidential election I don't really see how it's relevant.

And how exactly do you deal with it?

I don't condone any of the IRA's activities, but the media spin in this country is that the British are really a mild-mannered, peace-loving people, and the Queen's recent trek here emphasises how we should forget our differences over the years.

The reality is the British were an invading, violent, repressive force in Ireland for 800 years, where many slights were done and battles were fought, and a lot of our proud citizens were killed. That stuff can't and won't be forgotten, because the media likes to think they should. I'd far prefer McGuinness running in the election than norris, who I have absolutely zero time for.

[John83]

Willing to take their word for it but not the Shinners?

Some of the people mentioned above had very tasty family members at the very least.

I'd love to hear more, but I can't continue to read your posts as it's been suggested to me that you may be remotely related to someone who did something. I can't go into more detail because I can only type out of my ass for so long.

Sweet Zombie Jesus, is there anything more annoying than someone attempting to look like they've won an argument because they know something others don't?

[Lim till i die]

is there anything more annoying than someone attempting to look like they've won an argument because they know something others don't?

I'm not doing anything of the kind, there's info about a lot of their goings on out there, just not sure about typing it because twould fall into the "Gerry Adams was never in the IRA (wink)" category of discussion.

Google, not sarcasm, is your friend.

[geysir]

A tidy bit of work by Dana to pick up the council votes without any fuss or hysterics, what are the odds that she will have the nomination in her handbag before the deadline? Most times these past days on the radio news, comes an announcement of another blow to the Norris' campaign, though on Newstalk it is a major blow, the Indo headline is 'Norris loses out', on the IT it's 'Norris fails' beside a picture of a very haggard and distressed looking Norris, yet he like Dana appears to be making progress on the council circuit.