Just like Athlone and Salthill will be ..... unless Fingal breaks away from the rest of the country and floats over to America??
So childish! No Smiley for that.
Last edited by OneForTheFuture; 04/11/2010 at 7:41 AM.
Yes but if one fan stops supporting the club, the likelyhood is that the well supported clubs won't go bankrupt. But if Gerry Gannon pulls out (or is rightfully forced to stop funding the club with money that shouldn't be in his pocket), then Fingal will drastically have to cut back or go very quickly go bust. Fingals success has been artifical, they have achieved what they have by using tax payers money.Originally Posted by The Lep
For what its worth I have great respect for fans like Lampers and the Lep who go against the grain in a way and obviously love their club. I have had digs at Fingal in the past as I feel they bought their success as opposed to earning it. I sincerely hope they manage to stay afloat and their growth in the future is organic, through increasing their fan base. they play great football and have a decent skin at the helm in Liam Buckley. Best of luck to them and hopefully they manage to keep the show on the road.
Just to let you know Athlone and Salthill will be in Europe for the forseeable future, whether our soccer teams will be or not is another thing
Why are people who "need no introduction" always introduced?
Just to let you know Athlone and Salthill will be in Europe for the forseeable future, whether our soccer teams will be or not is another thing
That was my point sir!
One of the country's leading construction companies, Pierse Construction, has asked the Commercial Court to appoint a liquidator.
Lawyers for the company said the position had 'materially disimproved' since an interim examiner was appointed last month, and the company no longer wished to proceed with the examinership process.
http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/1104/pierse-business.html
It appears that bad debts from the benefactor of Sporting Fingal has brought down one the the country's biggest construction companies.
while i dont think this is the end i believe that this is the beginning of the end for sporting
I wish i did not know then what I dont know now
Personally I hope you are wrong.
I havnt been able to post lately due to problems with the computer. Probably a good thing.
I have to say that if selling these players and letting others go means the club can keep to what looks like being a smaller budget then thats fine by me. Its probably time we started to focus more on the club itself rather than big signings.
Iv loved every minute of the last 3 seasons including bringing in these players but at the end of the day, all i care about is the future of the club. Nothing else.
That article has nothing to do with Sporting Fingal so give it a rest will ye. You are scrapping the bottom of the barrel just to have a pop at this stage.
Trust me Sporting Fingal will be around for a long time yet.
There's no need to be so defensive. I appreciate the temptation to be in denial. However, any news relating to someone who has subsidised a club to the tune of at least €1.5m is relevent.
I dont think so seeing that he isnt mentioned in the article.
Perhaps you prefer I quote from this article:
[Pierce] which employed 700 people at its peak but now has 211 workers, cited the economic downturn and cashflow difficulties caused by bad debts of about €30 million on completed works as the reasons why it has sought the protection of the courts. Counsel said €16m of those bad debts were owed by Gannon Homes for works carried out at the new town centre at Clongriffin in Dublin
http://www.irishexaminer.com/busines...0m-133382.html
True - sure you couldn't get rid of the name even in an assets firesale....
Ou-est le Centre George Pompidou?
You should have posted that article first then shouldnt you and then i would have still told you that whats going on at Pierse is nothing to do Sporting Fingal.
You're not following the thread closely.
Gannon (your benefactor) was quoted in court when Pierce sought an examinership. However, Pierce told the court today that they can't save their business and all the jobs are lost. The fact that Gannon was not quoted in this article is not relevent as he had been mentioned in the earlier application. The article you take exception to is relevent as it is an update to the earlier action.
This is relevent to Sporting Fingal as Gannon pumped a lot of money into your club:
2008: €500,000
2009: €750,000
2010: ?
No, its still hasnt got anything to do with Sporting Fingal.
I fear you're the one who derailed the thread, White Horse. This is a thread related to the survival prospects of a football club, not a thread for compiling a dossier of reasons to hate a developer.
It could only be considered "derailing" by a person incapable of joining up the dots.
Yes, you've very good at connecting dots. Unfortunately, these are dots best joined in another forum.
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks