Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 49 of 80 FirstFirst ... 39474849505159 ... LastLast
Results 961 to 980 of 1591

Thread: Tipp South & District League 2009/10

  1. #961
    Banned daisycutter's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2009
    Location
    limerick
    Posts
    129
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by redcardrory View Post
    the only ones objecting is st micheals they must be afraid of pike
    something is wrong somewere to me, why was a replay awarded?,if pike played an illegal player they should be thrown out full stop...but if pike didnt play an illegal player they should go all the way and refuse to replay the tie...this outcome is only confusing the matter and proving the FAI are a joke ..hope the view out come is sorted out better!!!!!

  2. #962
    Youth Team
    Joined
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    166
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by daisycutter View Post
    this outcome is only confusing the matter and proving the FAI are a joke!!!!!
    this is brilliant because fifa wouldnt award ireland a replay over circumstances................ and another few reasons why fai are a joke are 1. you cannot buy replica jerseys of the national team 2. john delaney makes a mockery of us as a nation 3. eirtricity lge is goin nowhere fast 4. gaa clubs around the country have fabulous facilities and fai spend their money on 5 or 6 big salaries instead of investing where it counts

  3. #963
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mogus View Post
    this is brilliant because fifa wouldnt award ireland a replay over circumstances................ and another few reasons why fai are a joke are 1. you cannot buy replica jerseys of the national team 2. john delaney makes a mockery of us as a nation 3. eirtricity lge is goin nowhere fast 4. gaa clubs around the country have fabulous facilities and fai spend their money on 5 or 6 big salaries instead of investing where it counts
    You are 100% correct they are a joke.they are a closed shop up there.when the two internationals were played in thomond park they didn't even bother to promote them.only international jersey in the world where there is a sponsor across the front of them, a proper farce of an organisation which is run by someone who cannot even speak properly.....

  4. #964
    Banned
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    538
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by nononsense View Post
    What a shameful decision by the F.A.I to replay the St.Michaels/Pike Rovers game. St.Michaels lodged an objection as to legality of the Pike Rovers team. The objection was found to be in order and correct. By rule St.Michaels should play Clonmel Town in the semi-final and Pike Rovers eliminated. Not according to the F.A.I. The team which did everything above board and abided by the rules of the competition must play again the team which did not abide by the rules of the competition and was illegal. And what must Clonmel Town make of this. Think back to the Munster Junior Cup a few seasons ago. Pike Rovers objected to Clonmel Town. Town were deemed to have played an illegal player in contravention of the rules of that time and were eliminated. No offer of a replay. St.Michaels and Clonmel Town must be very disappointed at the F.A.I. decision. Saints, who have done no wrong, can either replay as instructed or make an expensive appeal to F.A.I. Senior Council. In the meantime Clonmel Town must wait helplessly for the outcome, hardly the correct motivation. The
    nononsense im a neutral, and i was at the match i it comes accross as tough st michaels are afraid of pike, they arent that good if i was a st micheals player i would want another crack at them cant under stand why ye would want the fai junior committee to win it for ye. I think pike are appealing todays decision. COME ON MICHAELS SHOW ABIT OF CLUB PRIDE.

  5. #965
    Banned the dazzler's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    fairview
    Posts
    398
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by trueview6 View Post
    nononsense im a neutral, and i was at the match i it comes accross as tough st michaels are afraid of pike, they arent that good if i was a st micheals player i would want another crack at them cant under stand why ye would want the fai junior committee to win it for ye. I think pike are appealing todays decision. COME ON MICHAELS SHOW ABIT OF CLUB PRIDE.
    they arent that good maybe but we havent beaten them in 7years haha

  6. #966
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by the dazzler View Post
    they arent that good maybe but we havent beaten them in 7years haha
    Doesn't say much for ye then dazz.ha ha.

  7. #967
    Reserves
    Joined
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South Tipp
    Posts
    377
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Now I know what a fudge is. Irish solution to an Irish problem. Disgrace.

  8. #968
    Youth Team Redman028's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Clonmel
    Posts
    149
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Will this player be allowed to play in replay???
    "I can't believe it. I can't believe it. Football. Bloody hell."

  9. #969
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    58
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Just looking at a number of your posts in relation to the Pike V St Michael's game and the "illegal" player. I read on the FAI website that a rematch is ordered in the interest of Fair Play.
    Not wishing to side with anyone but it is a carbon copy of what happened with Westport and Carew Park about 5 years ago. Westport were beaten on penalties in the semi final but an illegal player played. Westport made a protest to the FAI junior Council. It was accepted that an illegal player played for the Carew side, but they were also told either by Limerick League or Munster F.A. that it was o.k for the player to play. The end result was that Westport had to travel again down to Limerick and beat Carew Park 2 - 0 in the replayed game. Maybe there is a lesson in that, but why does it continue to happen with Limerick clubs practically every season?

  10. #970
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    The secretary of Fai junior council told Carew that that player could play,it just goes to show how much of a shambles football at local and national level is in.don't think it will ever change either.!

  11. #971
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Redman028 View Post
    Will this player be allowed to play in replay???
    Not sure but if the match is null and void Tobin will still be susended I presume.

  12. #972
    Banned Poolman's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Shebeen
    Posts
    113
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fair Play View Post
    Just looking at a number of your posts in relation to the Pike V St Michael's game and the "illegal" player. I read on the FAI website that a rematch is ordered in the interest of Fair Play.
    Not wishing to side with anyone but it is a carbon copy of what happened with Westport and Carew Park about 5 years ago. Westport were beaten on penalties in the semi final but an illegal player played. Westport made a protest to the FAI junior Council. It was accepted that an illegal player played for the Carew side, but they were also told either by Limerick League or Munster F.A. that it was o.k for the player to play. The end result was that Westport had to travel again down to Limerick and beat Carew Park 2 - 0 in the replayed game. Maybe there is a lesson in that, but why does it continue to happen with Limerick clubs practically every season?
    A very good post and i think a replay is probably the fairest, i was told by an ldmc memeber that colm carroll was a year and a day out of league of ireland that he was ok to play, i think the fai have done there best to be as fair as they can but looking through some of the posts here it cmes accross here as st michaels would prefer to win it by objection and not on the pitch, football is all about winning on the pitch i think it puts the secetary of st michaels in a terrible position.

  13. #973
    Youth Team Redman028's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Clonmel
    Posts
    149
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by serpico View Post
    Not sure but if the match is null and void Tobin will still be susended I presume.
    Ya id agree with you, Tobin suspension will still stand (well it should anyway)
    "I can't believe it. I can't believe it. Football. Bloody hell."

  14. #974
    Reserves Tipp Top's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cashel
    Posts
    316
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Poolman View Post
    A very good post and i think a replay is probably the fairest, i was told by an ldmc memeber that colm carroll was a year and a day out of league of ireland that he was ok to play, i think the fai have done there best to be as fair as they can but looking through some of the posts here it cmes accross here as st michaels would prefer to win it by objection and not on the pitch, football is all about winning on the pitch i think it puts the secetary of st michaels in a terrible position.
    what a ridiculous post,if colm carroll was ok to play there would be no replay,caroll was illegal but the LDMC took the blame for his registration and thus cleared Pike of any wrong doing.....maybe in a week or 2 you might grasp whats happening

  15. #975
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Tipp Top View Post
    what a ridiculous post,if colm carroll was ok to play there would be no replay,caroll was illegal but the LDMC took the blame for his registration and thus cleared Pike of any wrong doing.....maybe in a week or 2 you might grasp whats happening
    Who said ldmc took the blame.and what did they take the blame for.??everyone here is presuming pile are guilty of an infringement but no-one has solid proof.all hearsay.let's just wait and see what happens.??

  16. #976
    Reserves
    Joined
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    640
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    251
    Thanked in
    132 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Poolman View Post
    A very good post and i think a replay is probably the fairest, i was told by an ldmc memeber that colm carroll was a year and a day out of league of ireland that he was ok to play, i think the fai have done there best to be as fair as they can but looking through some of the posts here it cmes accross here as st michaels would prefer to win it by objection and not on the pitch, football is all about winning on the pitch i think it puts the secetary of st michaels in a terrible position.
    I'm sorry, but you are wrong here. You are missing a very important point. Football may be all about winning, but this is only the case when those who are on the pitch are entitled to be there in the first place.

    It may sound cruel, but rules are rules, and it is the responsibility of the teams to ensure that they are fully compliant with the rules. In this case, it is clear that Pike Rovers, were not fully compliant, therefore they should have been disqualified from playing, and not given a replay at all.

    Furthermore, there seems to be some problem with people on the site who think that St Michaels should be in some way ashamed of themselves because people within the club know every in and out of the FAI rulebook. There is nothing wrong with that at all. Every single club should know every in and out of the FAI rulebook. It's actually stupid to complain about other clubs being smarter than your own club, rather than going off and finding out the rules for yourself.

    In fact, if I had my way, I think Pike Rovers should be made to compensate teams that they beat in the past if they beat them using players which were not entitled to be on the pitch.

    It is a simple matter of fairness. Let games be decided on the field.. but only with players entitled to be on the pitch in the first place. Don't blame the Limerick league. Pike are a big club, and would or at least should, have been aware that some of their players may have questions against them (eg a player coming back from LOI). They should have made 100% sure, with documentary proof, that their players were eligible to play. Otherwise, no dice.

    I am sorry, but that's the cold hard facts of it.

  17. Thanks From:


  18. #977
    Reserves Tipp Top's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cashel
    Posts
    316
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by serpico View Post
    Who said ldmc took the blame.and what did they take the blame for.??everyone here is presuming pile are guilty of an infringement but no-one has solid proof.all hearsay.let's just wait and see what happens.??
    serpico you are insinuating Pike did nothing wrong,so why is there a replay then???

  19. #978
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Tipp Top View Post
    serpico you are insinuating Pike did nothing wrong,so why is there a replay then???
    If they did anything wrong why are they still in the competition.there are too many conflicting stories blaming this and that.let's just wait for the outcome.according to FAI pike did nothing wrong.There words not mine.

  20. #979
    Reserves Tipp Top's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cashel
    Posts
    316
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by serpico View Post
    If they did anything wrong why are they still in the competition.there are too many conflicting stories blaming this and that.let's just wait for the outcome.according to FAI pike did nothing wrong.There words not mine.
    why are they not in the semi final if they are so innocent....clearly there is a problem and a big one

  21. #980
    Banned serpico's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Location
    O connell st
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Tipp Top View Post
    why are they not in the semi final if they are so innocent....clearly there is a problem and a big one
    Let's just wait and see.

Page 49 of 80 FirstFirst ... 39474849505159 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Tipp South & District League 2016/17
    By biglad101 in forum Junior League
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 14/08/2016, 10:55 AM
  2. Tipp South & District League 2012/13
    By Redman028 in forum Junior League
    Replies: 1149
    Last Post: 19/06/2013, 8:28 AM
  3. Tipp South & District League 2011/12
    By stelling in forum Junior League
    Replies: 1512
    Last Post: 17/06/2012, 6:15 AM
  4. Tipp South & District League 2010/11
    By Tipperary_Man in forum Junior League
    Replies: 1468
    Last Post: 21/06/2011, 10:52 PM
  5. Tipp South & District League 2006/07
    By C.T.F.C in forum Junior League
    Replies: 392
    Last Post: 31/05/2007, 9:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •