They had to provide audited accounts for licensing though. It should have been picked up on then if it was regular wage payments and not cash.
They haven't lodged accounts since 2007. I guess now we know why.
Stu- there's been nothing to indicate that tax wasn't paid on the whole amount.
But then up until yesterday the Derry board were denying any wrongdoing. I would guess that HMRC will be looking at this very carefully indeed, and cannot help suspecting that there is more to come on this.
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
They had to provide audited accounts for licensing though. It should have been picked up on then if it was regular wage payments and not cash.
Upwards to the vanguard where the pressure is too high.
Yes but as I said above you also have to provide full audited accounts each year for licensing. Sounds like the auditor wasn't doing his job or maybe it was being overlooked by the powers that be.
Upwards to the vanguard where the pressure is too high.
The fact that Derry did not simply make the extra payments to players for some extra made up job at the club (as is obviously happening elsewhere) would say to me that the likelihood is that this activity was not just aimed at the 65% rule.
I also would find it worrying from a DCFC point of view that the vice chair has chosen to remain. His pronouncements on DC-Chat would not inspire confidence.
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
Here's a blank piece of paper, now can you sign it there at the bottom like a
good chap and we'll print up the details later. Nothing for you to worry about.
Larry Be Wyse
www.acsportsimages.com
While this may well be what happens, there was no A League in 2007 to give an order to which club should be given the first division place so there was no real alternative to a beauty contest to decide.
Could the money have come from undeclared gate receipts and so not have been visible to the FAI at all?
We're not arrogant, we're just better.
There was in a way; the clubs had all applied when Kilkenny pulled out. Fingal were an A League side when they signed Conan, I remember. It's not strictly the same thing, but it's not completely different either.
But do that in cash, not going through people's bank accounts (and presumably the club's account, if as it seems, it was only the larger payment that was going through).Originally Posted by schumi
Maybe they thought Pat McDaid was Brian Clough?
If it was, the players were, as Pineapple Stu says, being paid partly in cash, which doesn't seem to have been the case. If it was, it would also constitute tax evasion - there's VAT on them there gate receipts, or else there were figures on the Derry accounts the FAI should have been able to tell weren't adding up.
You can't spell failure without FAI
We're not arrogant, we're just better.
I'd say you could get around that easily enough if you wanted to. The only thing said about promotion from the A League is that you have to finish top three in your group and then win a play-off. If no non-reserve side finishes top three, there's no play-off. I'd say that's enough to allow that a new league side would be selected the same way as Fingal were, TBH.
That's the point ORA is making when he says management accounts can be useless.Originally Posted by John83
does anyone know if the SPC ( Standard Player Contract ) is submitted every year for each player, so that the club can obtain a license ?
Depends on the length of the contract I think but it has to be submitted to register the player initially.
Upwards to the vanguard where the pressure is too high.
Absolutely no way I believe that the players should get away with this nonsense. The PFAI fought long and hard to get a Standard Palyers Contract, which is based on gross amounts of money. This contract supersedes any other one, so a player saying he sighed a blank form and left it to the club to fill in is a joke! There are 4 parts to the form, one for the club one for the palyer and 2 go to the FAI. So are we supposed to belive that none of them got their copy from Derry city?
Its been noted elsewhere, but whatever about the rest of the players, we have two qualified accountants on our playing staff.
You'd think they at least would be wary of signing blank contracts when they had already signed a contract....
I guess maybe the player got a copy with the higher payment and the FAI got the one with the lower. The FAI have to have one copy, I'm assuming that as per any other job where you get a contract the employee gets a contract, so that the club are the only folks who really know whats going on? I hope.
Bookmarks