City v Rams.

Printable View

25/03/2008, 9:55 PM
Risteard

City v Rams.

Changes must be made to become ruthless in front of goal.

Pretty simple not too risky move would be.

--------------------Mick----------------
Hoggy-------Dan-----AN Other------Cockney
--------------------------------------------
--------George------Healy-----Gamble-------
--------------------------------------------
--------Flynny-----Mooney----------Kearney.

With the midget covering back if we're under pressure.
This would also get a lot more out of Georgie imo with Colmans being a fairly tight pitch.
Don't read that as Flynny being a winger btw.
25/03/2008, 11:02 PM
alansmithccfc

I would move Georgie up front with Mooney. While putting sulliva out wide right. Stick with the back 5, Lordan might improve.
25/03/2008, 11:06 PM
Risteard

I'm in favour of the move Georgie up front idea but not for this one. Think we need ruthlessness and men in the box more than creativity at the mo.
Georgie and Mooney up front would be the job for Dublin, Derry and Drog trips.
I just think Sullivan, Healy and Gamble in MF isn't attacking enough for a heaving green and red St. Colmans Park, no?
27/03/2008, 12:32 PM
Rambler1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Risteard

I just think Sullivan, Healy and Gamble in MF isn't attacking enough for a heaving green and red St. Colmans Park, no?

Think it will be
-------------------Mick & George ----------------
Hoggy---Dan----Another---Cockney---Healy---Gamble--------Flynny
----------------------------Mooney-------------------------------
----------------------------Kearney-------------------------------
27/03/2008, 12:34 PM
micls

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rambler1

Think it will be
-------------------Mick & George ----------------
Hoggy---Dan----Another---Cockney---Healy---Gamble--------Flynny
----------------------------Mooney-------------------------------
----------------------------Kearney-------------------------------

I'm not really sure what that post was supposed to be.....but if you were trying to be funny I'd stick to the day job lad.
27/03/2008, 12:56 PM
pateen

Quote:

Originally Posted by micls

I'm not really sure what that post was supposed to be.....but if you were trying to be funny I'd stick to the day job lad.

Jez man dont take life so serously.
Bad joke an all but only in good spirit.
27/03/2008, 12:58 PM
micls

Quote:

Originally Posted by pateen

Jez man dont take life so serously.
Bad joke an all but only in good spirit.

No problem with Rams fans trying to wind us up or make jokes....but I just didnt get it. Maybe it makes more sense to you :confused:
27/03/2008, 5:08 PM
Pablo Escobar

Quote:

Originally Posted by micls

No problem with Rams fans trying to wind us up or make jokes....but I just didnt get it. Maybe it makes more sense to you :confused:

I don't get it either.
27/03/2008, 9:37 PM
A face

Here is the Ramblers formation
27/03/2008, 9:45 PM
GavinZac

Quote:

Originally Posted by A face

Here is the Ramblers formation

ah cmere that photo is clearly doctored

st. colemans pitch isnt that level
27/03/2008, 9:51 PM
bellavistaman

Quote:

Originally Posted by A face

Here is the Ramblers formation

too much time on your hands:D.

Its going to the class cant wait. I think that this game wont suit georgie at all, hope im right. Worry massively about flynny always scores agasinst us, absolute class act IMO.
27/03/2008, 9:56 PM
GavinZac

myself and a buddy were kicking about on st. colemans pitch yesterday for a photoshoot. i reckon if kearney stands in the corner of the pitch nearest the dressing rooms, the ground level of the opposite side of the pitch will actually be above his head height.
27/03/2008, 9:59 PM
bellavistaman

Quote:

Originally Posted by GavinZac

myself and a buddy were kicking about on st. colemans pitch yesterday for a photoshoot. i reckon if kearney stands in the corner of the pitch nearest the dressing rooms, the ground level of the opposite side of the pitch will actually be above his head height.

:D:D:D, any fear of darren murphy playing, not a hope would he last the 90.
27/03/2008, 10:01 PM
GavinZac

Quote:

Originally Posted by bellavistaman

:D:D, any fear of darren murphy playing, not a hope would he last the 90.

why, sure there'll be a grand warm reception since the crowd will be green and red :D
27/03/2008, 10:18 PM
pete

Derrys goal was the first we conceded in the second half this season so we need to play downhill in the first, score a few goals & kill the game. The pitch is small so lack of width not a big problem. I can't see too many changes being made.

Will be sad to miss this one but must try the one later in the season. Should be cracking atmosphere.
28/03/2008, 1:08 PM
Cici900

Quote:

Originally Posted by pete

Derrys goal was the first we conceded in the second half this season so we need to play downhill in the first, score a few goals & kill the game. The pitch is small so lack of width not a big problem. I can't see too many changes being made.

Will be sad to miss this one but must try the one later in the season. Should be cracking atmosphere.

There is no real hill:rolleyes:
28/03/2008, 5:58 PM
MainManRam

Come on the Rams
28/03/2008, 8:15 PM
A face

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cici900

There is no real hill:rolleyes:

We're not saying it drops below sea level or anything, but yeah ... there is definitely a hill :eek:
30/03/2008, 5:37 PM
ramsfan

for a team that has no ground ye are very critical
30/03/2008, 5:45 PM
GavinZac

Quote:

Originally Posted by ramsfan

for a team that has no ground ye are very critical

Frankly I'd prefer to have plans for a nice new ground, over a farmers field that hasnt even been flattened.
30/03/2008, 7:04 PM
depor

Quote:

Originally Posted by GavinZac

Frankly I'd prefer to have plans for a nice new ground, over a farmers field that hasnt even been flattened.

pipedreams. all people that take over clubs say that they'll be getting a new ground eg liverpool and many others but a lot of the time nothing happens. i cant see how they would finance it as they are at a million euro loss before the season starts, and thats from their own mouth. to find a suitable site in cork wont come cheap, your talking millions for the site before any development is done.

but good luck to them if they can do it. it would be good to see.
30/03/2008, 7:14 PM
GavinZac

Quote:

Originally Posted by depor

pipedreams. all people that take over clubs say that they'll be getting a new ground eg liverpool and many others but a lot of the time nothing happens. i cant see how they would finance it as they are at a million euro loss before the season starts, and thats from their own mouth.

:confused: It costs �2,000,000 to run Cork City per year, perhaps that "revealation" from tynan which Spillane misquoted as "Cork City lose �2,000,000 a year" is what you mean?

Quote:

to find a suitable site in cork wont come cheap, your talking millions for the site before any development is done.

but good luck to them if they can do it. it would be good to see.

For the investment company, City are an excuse to build a large entertainment facility; any success for us is a bonus. Not just millions, �35 to 40 million actually.
01/04/2008, 9:48 PM
don ramo

i can understand the fact that city want a place to call there home, but its seems a bit to amitious, 20,000 seats, maybe 10,000 but with the cost of land these days you would wanna make it worth it, so would have to be 20,000, bohs new 10,000 seater is gonna cost E20m, i cant see any club with no assets getting that sort of money, ye have just given yer grants to the MFA, so i cant see the FAI helping ye out,

but in sayin that cork city and munster are the only 2 non gaa associations that would make use of such a facitlity, plus it would make a nice change to the marque,
02/04/2008, 2:37 AM
GavinZac

Quote:

Originally Posted by don ramo

i can understand the fact that city want a place to call there home, but its seems a bit to amitious, 20,000 seats, maybe 10,000 but with the cost of land these days you would wanna make it worth it, so would have to be 20,000, bohs new 10,000 seater is gonna cost E20m, i cant see any club with no assets getting that sort of money, ye have just given yer grants to the MFA, so i cant see the FAI helping ye out,

but in sayin that cork city and munster are the only 2 non gaa associations that would make use of such a facitlity, plus it would make a nice change to the marque,

Arkaga have said they will be spending €35m to €40m on a 28,000 seater stadium in one of a couple of locations, with talk that one location has already been settled upon and will feature the things you'd expect from a modern stadium/entertainment campus. theres lots more info on it from the initially statement last summer and the "leak" just after christmas. The stadium would be self-financing, in that they will be taking the investment of their members and looking to return a profit within 10-15 years. No grants, no MFA, no FAI, no need for collateral assets, nothing. Cork City were simple a cheaply available club in an underserviced city in the most popular sport in the country with the potential to perhaps down the line add a few 'big event' dates to the owner's calendar.
03/04/2008, 5:55 PM
depor

i can see what your saying, a lot of events could be held in the new stadium hence making it more viable.

on what tynan said, on the echo he is quoted as saying the club will be projecting a loss of 1,000,000, im sure of that. but then again he mightnt be quoted correctly but thats what the echo said at the time.
04/04/2008, 12:21 AM
A face

Quote:

Originally Posted by depor

on what tynan said, on the echo he is quoted as saying the club will be projecting a loss of 1,000,000, im sure of that. but then again he mightnt be quoted correctly but thats what the echo said at the time.

There in lies the problem. People say you shouldn't always believe was you read in the papers, but i disagree with that. You should actually find out who wrote the piece and try and find out how ~~incredible~~ credible the guy is.
05/04/2008, 3:10 PM
depor

Quote:

Originally Posted by A face

There in lies the problem. People say you shouldn't always believe was you read in the papers, but i disagree with that. You should actually find out who wrote the piece and try and find out how ~~incredible~~ credible the guy is.

thats exactly why i said hes ''quoted''as sayin and that its the echo we're on about so caution to the wind on the accuracy.