It's true...
I for one would like to see him back.
Printable View
It's true...
I for one would like to see him back.
Where did you hear or dream this??
Grand he had a good season with us last season but hes been rotting away at shams. I don't know if he'd be welcomed back, you know the whole reynolds rot in hell thing etc etc etc. Are you joking?? You would be one of the minority who would welcome him even if he is a good soccer player but if it wins us the league i don't care if the devil himself signs but signing reynolds would be close enough to that:rolleyes:
Oh, well we'll see in the next few months.....
reynolds and nwanko in the middle
class outfit then me reckons
I think he was a huge loss to us this year. He was our best player last year. I would welcome him back. I never held it against him for leaving.
Now its time to sit back and wait for the torrent of abuse..
leave him where he is if he's not good enough for the homeless scum he's not good enough for us.
ye are unbelieveable, for any club (esp. Cork + Longford) to take Reynolds back would be the most horrible thing you could do to loyal supporters... The man has no spine, he might be a class player on his day but taking him back is crazy talk. I, for one, would love to see that he never played premier division football again... scum...
seemingly the only reason Fenlon has lost interest in signing him is that he couldn't keep his trap shut on his move...
i thought he was our best player last season, but i think taking him back would be daft.
He's had a club per season for a while now, continuing the trend next season, he's done nothing to suggest he wouldn't continue it after another year with us. we need to build a strong and consistent midfield, he might give us the former, but we'd spend the season wondering where he's off to next.
Yeah Reynolds has no loyalty to any club & not the player to build any midfield around.Quote:
Originally posted by tiktok
He's had a club per season for a while now, continuing the trend next season, he's done nothing to suggest he wouldn't continue it after another year with us. we need to build a strong and consistent midfield, he might give us the former, but we'd spend the season wondering where he's off to next.
From what Rovers fans are saying, the Rat himself has gone the ole Kevlin Flanagan route.
He'd be on a full time players wage but most likely training part time and keeping his blow job.
I'd be fairly torn, but if he adds to our midfield, then i'd take him with open arms.
On the Flanaghan thing, well shams seem to have it in for him because he hasn't produced the form for them which he did for us. That said, when you play for a useless shower like Shams, the mediocrity can only rub off.
Welcome home????
As much as I despise him, if he would be a good addition to the first 11 i would take him back.
However, as has already been said, he doesn't know the meaning of the word loyalty and could desert us at any time also he's been playing sh!t with Homeless so bearing all that in mind, we're probably best steering clear of him.
well i for one dont want to see him ever in cork again let alone wearing the jersey of the club i follow
RATnolds can fupp off and stay with the homeless scum
Well there's the solution then. Go follow Ramblers:D :D :DQuote:
Originally posted by James
well i for one dont want to see him ever in cork again let alone wearing the jersey of the club i follow
RATnolds can fupp off and stay with the homeless scum
IF we were to take the Rat back we'd need to tie him to a binding contract and make sure he doesnt run. I'd say a banner along the lines of "Rennie Your On Parole" would gt the message across.
Don't want him back. Not as if he was a brilliant player for us anyway.
Be amazed if any of this rumour true.
This would hardly be a step forward for City. He has had a brutal season with Rovers and would not want to go full time.
While I did think he had a great season with us, surely our club has moved forward, beyond Reynolds and his type of attitude.
Id take him back, but you'd have to put him (and all other players) on at least a 2 year contract. I dont think that there's much point in signing a part-time player though, we need a full-time squad (even if its smaller then the one we already have).
Forget about the rat,leave him rot with the travellers(HOMELESS SCUM) up in the pale who are also looking for a place to call home!
I have no doubt he is a good player and that we have missed him, but re-signing him would be a slap in the face to the fans and to the players who stayed loyal to the club. Honestly, it was not so much the fact that he left, but the manner of it which got to most people. I think if we are really looking to challenge for the league next season, we should be looking at better players than alan reynolds.
Well-he'd be agood addition but do we really want him back after what he did? He pretty much ****ed on this club-do we want that?
He is not welcome !!
Whats all this about needing the rat back to tighten up our midfield.I don't remember him being that great last year for us.Pick any two from Greg,CT O'BRIEN,Nwankwo or O'grady and thats our centre midfield.It might not be real madrid but is the rat that much better than those four?
We don't want that RAT back,leave him rot.:mad:
why would anyone think of getting RATnolds back even as a joke
******************PAT DOLANS************************
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!REBEL ARMY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IF Reynolds came back are some of ye saying you'd boo a player in a City shirt??
Then who's being disloyal?
I think when he's playing well he's one of the league's best midfielders, but I would question his loyalty. We don't want mercenaries at City.
I wouldn't boo him in a city shirt,I just wouldn't like to see him back in a city shirt.
garden leave.... common practiceQuote:
Originally posted by Conor74
part of the settlement was that Pardew would spend one month "in quarantine"
but would you sing for him?Quote:
Originally posted by DolansWaistcoat
I wouldn't boo him in a city shirt
not a hope.Quote:
Originally posted by Xlex
but would you sing for him?
naw,wouldn't sing for him if he came back to city.
On second thoughts we could sing 'WHAT CLUB ARE YOU GONNA JOIN NEXT,YA RAT!';)
what if reynolds scored an incredible individual effort?Would you cheer for him and start saying what a goal or would you just say took that well but hes still a fagat and stay quiet.Seriuously.......
I'd celebrate City scoring (presuming the incredible individual effort was for us) and not change my opinion that the guy is a scumbag
just say... eh... I dunno.... :confused: , he put your sister up the pole? :confused: :confused:
the only sister that scumbag would put up the pole is his own. inbred ratQuote:
Originally posted by Xlex
just say... eh... I dunno.... :confused: , he put your sister up the pole? :confused: :confused:
Brilliant response there Eanna. :DQuote:
Originally posted by Éanna
the only sister that scumbag would put up the pole is his own. inbred rat
But seriously, why are we debating the rat? How serious is the rumour concerning his return?
Don't know if he's coming back and don't care.
What about when he does come back to the cross with whatever team he's wormed his way into,we could all chant ''Reynolds got his sister up the pole'',or make a banner for the shed saying the above statement.:p
Wonder how long it would take the stewards to tell us to take it down?
Hit the nail there...If he comes back, so be it, but he'll still be a disloyal scumbag in my eyes.Quote:
Originally posted by DolansWaistcoat
Don't know if he's coming back and don't care.
He is a rat .... why should be land ourselves with him. He has shown his true colours now. No club in their right mind would touch him, if the have an ambition in building a team.
We need players we can rely on .... and he aint one of them.