Anyone got a link to it, didnt get any papers today.
Printable View
Anyone got a link to it, didnt get any papers today.
Gloomy reading indeed:rolleyes:
From When Saturday Comes:
http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/4010/38/
Back on topic - is there any confirmation that the Radio Foyle reports are correct?
What Radio Foyle reports, that we are going into Division 1 next season?
Off the top of my head, that would need:
1) Us to form a new legal entity and buy the trading name off the liquidator
2) Find a way to pay off the IL creditors within the rules of the law
3) Put together a licensing application
4) Get a team and manager
5) An FAI Board meeting to consider our application
Whatever way you look at it there's months of work before we know for sure.
A lot of woolly-minded, uninformed nonsense there, I think.
For one thing, when referring to "they", you blithely and incorrectly conflate the IL, IFA and "big clubs" in your determination to bad mouth senior football in NI.
More specifically, certain parties may not have been "overly worried" about DCFC having a place in senior football, but others were much more sympathetic - eg Glentoran assisting their efforts to join the LOI. Besides, things change over the decades, as demonstrated by another club from the second city, Institute, gaining a place at the top level.
As for Coleraine being "part of the furniture", what does that actually mean? That their presence a long distance from Belfast screws your other argument about "big clubs" not wanting to travel?
And as for Swifts, Limavady and Stute being "unwelcome" for being small or distant etc, that is patent balls. Otherwise why would the IFA/IL have adopted a pyramid system and licensing system etc, which allows for progression on footballing merit from Intermediate level via the Championship, to the top level, so long as minimum off-field standards are maintained?
Why would the IL Premier Division be 12 clubs, as opposed to 10 in the LOI? Why would a major provincial club like Portadown, reasonably close to Belfast, have had their Premier application rejected on a technicality, when clubs like Stute were in there? Why would a Belfast club like Donegal Celtic have been excluded, whilst a distant club like Swifts were accepted.
And as for Omagh Town, you clearly don't know the first thing about what went on at that club. Legal considerations prevent me from suggesting the real reasons for their demise (regretted by absolutely no-one, btw), other than to say that many feel their difficulties were more a matter for the RUC to investigate, than the IFA's to resolve.
And as for all the FAI/Delaney are doing for DCFC etc, that is a long way from what certain individuals at the very heart of the club were saying as recently as a week or two ago.
Things change, you know, even if they don't in the minds of certain other individuals...:rolleyes:
If (either) DCFC is to play in the LOI next year, they have to be a member of their "home" National Association - in this case, the IFA.
And the IFA are liable to want to know exactly which "DCFC" is applying to join (or renew with) them - there is the little matter of debts to other IFA Members clubs to consider, after all.
Of course, DCFC and the FAI may attempt to ignore such niceties and who knows, they might even get away with it, but it is exactly this unwillingness to face facts and respect rules which keeps getting both into difficulties.
Still, why bother about all that, when you can deflect attention from it by snide comments, personal abuse and smart-alec remarks?
The same legal constraints don't seem to bother you in relation to Derry City.
One rule for one a different one for the rest. Usual story as far as the IFA/IL goes in relation to Derry City.
You seem to like to dish it out but don't like getting it back. You know where you can go if you don't like it...
The individuals who have departed the club with their reputations in tatters?
Why exactly would any store be placed in what they said.
The FAI raised the issue of the IL creditors last week at the meetings that were held. No one is ignoring anything. But sure you keep shouting away.
Thankfully no-one else has the same absurd propensity that you do for repeating themselves ad nauseum over what is currently a moot point. Hence why the rest of the website works just fine.
Put the Kleenex back in the box and let's all just wait a few weeks and see what happens.
Final post on this - I've been bored into submission.
:ball:
You've made your point. Repeating yourself over and over and over to provoke a reaction is trolling.
If I posted what I (ahem) "strongly suspect" to be the case as regards Omagh Town, it would risk getting this forum closed down.
Where have I ever posted anything regarding DCFC which could be considered even remotely actionable?
How so?
The IL didn't want DCFC in the IL back in the 1980's, so they weren't voted back in. Similarly, the IFA/IL didn't want OTFC*, in any shape or form, back in the IL, so no effort was made to get them back in.
You might have mentioned Portadown's application for membership of the Prem being rejected by the IFA solely for being submitted 29 minutes late, or Donegal Celtic's application being outscored by other clubs considered less "attractive"/"justified".
How is any of that "one rule for one a different one for the rest"?
Dishing "what" out, exactly? Snide personal remarks? Refusing to answer direct questions? Don't think so, somehow.
As for "getting it back", I am not the one who keeps avoiding the issues in my posts.
Who's the one "who can't take it" now, then? Classy, real classy.
Anyhow, one of the reasons I like this forum is that it is well moderated; if I post anything which is out-of-order, it will be the Mods who direct me elsewhere, not some aggrieved poster who seemingly cannot bear to be reminded of certain uncomfortable truths about the team he supports.
* - Whatever point ANMouse was trying to make in his garbled post, his reference to OTFC made no supporting sense at all.
Note to DCFC Steve, ORA and others:
The above is an answer to a point which has been raised, whether it be a good reply or otherwise. It is such responses which allow for proper discussion on a message board.
Refusing to answer direct questions and choosing instead to make sarcastic remarks, or accusing the questioner of being repetitive or disruptive etc, even though he is merely trying to elicit a reply, does not.