Longford: I would not want to be associated with this team

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

30/06/2005, 1:13 AM
Schunter Netz

Lets not get anti-Longford here. Over the last five or six years, Longford have been one of the most progressive clubs in the league, a club that we get on with very well and one that plays positive, neat football. In fact, they have been notable for their short-passing, skillful approach while we were humping long balls to small forwards who used to be, or were thought to be, fast. Not so much has changed, and I don't see why Angry Patsh - he's always angry, it seems, and lashes out wildly - sees this performance as different, nor why its such an issue. that we drew a home game. An organised team with mid-table potential and a capable coach came to the Cross and got a draw. Cork played well but couldn't quite make the last pass or connection tell. Why the anger? Whats this campaign to hate Longford? Forgive my innocence, but I like Longford, I like when they come to Cork, and all they stand for in the campaign to have a truly NATIONAL league. We could have won the game five-nil but it didn't happen due to shortcomings in the Cork team...Duh...is this the wrong thread to mention that we need a forward who scores goals?
30/06/2005, 7:35 AM
patsh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schunter Netz

Lets not get anti-Longford here. Over the last five or six years, Longford have been one of the most progressive clubs in the league, a club that we get on with very well and one that plays positive, neat football. In fact, they have been notable for their short-passing, skillful approach while we were humping long balls to small forwards who used to be, or were thought to be, fast. Not so much has changed, and I don't see why Angry Patsh - he's always angry, it seems, and lashes out wildly - sees this performance as different, nor why its such an issue. that we drew a home game. An organised team with mid-table potential and a capable coach came to the Cross and got a draw. Cork played well but couldn't quite make the last pass or connection tell. Why the anger? Whats this campaign to hate Longford? Forgive my innocence, but I like Longford, I like when they come to Cork, and all they stand for in the campaign to have a truly NATIONAL league. We could have won the game five-nil but it didn't happen due to shortcomings in the Cork team...Duh...is this the wrong thread to mention that we need a forward who scores goals?

Who is angry?
Just because some wum like you can't actually read, it doesn't make me angry, anti-Longford or in any way dismissive of the club.
Never let whats actually written get in the way of one of your rants though, it hasn't before.
30/06/2005, 7:37 AM
Macy

Quote:

Originally Posted by patsh

Who is angry?
Just because some wum like you can't actually read, it doesn't make me angry, anti-Longford or in any way dismissive of the club.
Never let whats actually written get in the way of one of your rants though, it hasn't before.

Stop whinging about being called a whinger ffs.... :D
30/06/2005, 7:38 AM
patsh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macy

Stop whinging about being called a whinger ffs.... :D

Off with you to the rugger field, guy!:p
30/06/2005, 7:52 AM
razor

Bought the Mirror yesterday and what do I find, nearly a full page interview with Mr Alan "Attacking" Matthews on how he thinks Shels will win the League over City cos they have more strikers.
30/06/2005, 9:36 AM
paddigol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruairi

let's keep it friendly lads yeah? Patsh is simply expressing his opinion, which he is perfectly entitled to do. Just because you may not agree with it doesnt mean you can call him a "whinger" or whatever. If you've got an opinion then post it, dont just post casual insults, post something constructive.

anymore and i'll bin the thread, its going nowhere anyway

Roar

If you actually read my post you would see that i made those exact points.
It is his opinion and he's entitled to post it
Secondly, i never called him a whinger. i merely posted a rhetorical question.

I didn't realise it was forbidden to express an opinion (constructively made in my first post which was then misread and dismissed by others) which goes against the mob rule.

I'm not sure either why schunter netz was attacked and branded a wum for expressing sentiments similar to mine.
30/06/2005, 9:40 AM
patsh

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddigol

........attacked and branded.....

oohhh, sensitive type are you?
:D
30/06/2005, 1:42 PM
Sonic

Quote:

Originally Posted by patsh

All the Longford fans getting up on their high horses about this would want to cop themselves on. Deal with the point, and when you can't do that, don't go flinging whinger at someone when you can't think of anything else to say.

Longford EVERY time I've seen them, play dreadful, negative football under their present manager. They do it all the time against City, it's dire to watch, but bold, bold me for mentioning that FACT, I shouldn't be upsetting all the poor deluded Longford fans......:D

ahem at least im not delude.many of them are but not me.tbh i canniot understand how you go and not even try to win the game.its been like that since matthews took over against big teams and whatever tactics he employs thereafter seems to be good of course to beat the waterfords and ucds of this world.performances like that against shels on monday is what i want from now on alan A POSITIVE APPROACH
30/06/2005, 1:49 PM
the 12 th man

can someone do the decent thing and put this thread out of its misery
30/06/2005, 2:53 PM
Peadar

Quote:

Originally Posted by the 12 th man

can someone do the decent thing and put this thread out of its misery

I can't believe it's still going on!
In 48 hours, we'll have a UCD bashing thread to get stuck into. :D
30/06/2005, 2:56 PM
patsh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peadar

I can't believe it's still going on!
In 48 hours, we'll have a UCD bashing thread to get stuck into. :D

I was hoping I could keep this going until then, so I can whinge away about the Students until I can whinge about Longford after next Tuesday again!.......:p
30/06/2005, 3:02 PM
Ruairi

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddigol

If you actually read my post you would see that i made those exact points.

and if you read my post paddigol you'd see i didnt actually mention you, so why you assumed i was talking about you i cant tell
30/06/2005, 3:05 PM
pineapple stu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peadar

In 48 hours, we'll have a UCD bashing thread to get stuck into. :D

:D

Looking forward to it! Wasn't the last one binned?! ;)
30/06/2005, 3:11 PM
Peadar

Quote:

Originally Posted by pineapple stu

Wasn't the last one binned?! ;)

Probably was! :D
01/07/2005, 9:18 AM
fosterdollar

So much trolling on trolling and wuming on your own forum, no wonder yous had to direct some anger at Longford!
01/07/2005, 9:44 AM
patsh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magoo

So much trolling on trolling and wuming on your own forum, no wonder yous had to direct some anger at Longford!

Anger????
Not at all dear boy, just a critique of those patented Matthews football tactics.....:p
01/07/2005, 9:53 AM
fosterdollar

Critique ... hehe. No point patenting something that doesn't work ;)
01/07/2005, 2:21 PM
Ronnie

Patsh, thought you accpeted earlier this week that your comments couldn't be justified based on the performance in the cross alone? I was happy to leave it at that, and yet the threads still going on!
01/07/2005, 2:32 PM
the 12 th man

i would not want to be associated with this thread......... :rolleyes: .
01/07/2005, 2:34 PM
fosterdollar

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie

I was happy to leave it at that, and yet the threads still going on!

There's a certain amount of irony about this post

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page