Arab nations being aggressive doesn't excuse israeli aggression. Correct. Never said it did, and can't think why you assume I did :confused: .Quote:
Originally Posted by anto eile
The example of the Jewish guy from New jersey is also correct. It's an abhorance that such a person could oust someone from their homeland througha spurious interpretation of the Old Testament. Again, no argument there.
The point about the church... Not quite sure where you're coming from. The original church councils debated which books could be considered authentic and which were heretical, and rightly so. Bible scholars still do this to this date, and there is still debate over which books should and should not be included. Protestant bibles are shorter than their Catholic counterparts, for example. Not sure what agenda you're talking about- But then, I'm not a Catholic.
As for the Discovery Channel reference... the use of the wink wink icon is meant to denote a certain good natured cheekiness, that the sentence preceding it was not meant to be taken as entirely serious, and thus had a humourous subtext...Or was that a patronising thing to point out? ;) ;).
As for condescending prikcishness, accurate though it may be, please read Adam's announcement on personal attacks. He has threatened to shut the whole show down. :(