Nothing, as you know my good man.
Geysir, the only thing that precluded a player born in Northern Ireland from declaring for the Republic of Ireland pre GFA, was the 'Gentleman's Agreement' that existed between the two associations.
Printable View
The best post to date on the topic.
The Hypocrisy is depressing but predictable. If only if it because it makes a mockery of the IFA's laudable aims to embrace their wider populace.
Unsurprisingly I guess (& certainly not on here) the silent minority of fans of the North of which you speak and especially those involved directly in coaching, who have neither the time or resources to show such overt levels of prejudice, must feel so frustrated about such raw hatred.
The fellow who designed the 'alternative' Ulster flag on that other forum, who I know of via a mutual acquaintance, was ridiculed for advocating change, but that's what he & that minority are up against.
One small crumb of comfort though, from the marginally younger generation from someone who should support the North (he played for them in schoolboy trials), was a sincere message of consolation re. recent events....
If the same ever happened to 'his' lot, it's one person to whom it'd be reciprocated.
Yes - but you get the gist that there is a critical mass and after that is reached it doesn't make too much difference.Quote:
=Gather round;1290494
Less than 3 million, I believe. Do you mean Slovakia?
No, the IFA are between a rock and a hard place. Within FIFA/EUFA, the IFA are stuck hanging onto the coat tails of England (within the Home Nations). In the meantime every other country will be doing their best to put one over on England/Home Nations. You are probably also resented by most other nations because that effectively one country, the UK has four teams & somewhere like the Peoples' Republic of China with a population of 1.2 bn (with 48 different nationalities within its borders) with potential for real potential, has one Association, not to mention a country like Monaco cannot get FIFA/EUFA recognition.Quote:
Make your mind up. Either we're not England as well (and thus seen to be neutral, like you), or we're reliant on English support to be noticed. We can hardly be both at the same time.
Except that the likes of Michael Walker have never made any comments about choice. Purely about improving the pool of potential players and thus the strength of any notional team, as has happened in numerous other sports. Which are happy enough to call themselves :rolleyes: Ireland!!!
And we know you don't want it, but we can at least query other discrepancies raised by 'dtm' amongst others, about certain other 'ethics' highlighted.
Which aren't necessarily to deny 'choice', though you wouldn't think it from the level of paranoia on here or elsewhere, everytime someone suggests a UI team.
The whole Gibson episode has been very educational really - when you actually see how the NI fans resist even minor change (ie., flags & anthem) the best solution has been reached.
I do feel sorry though for the likes of Evans who will never get a chance to play in a major competition - how he will envy most his team mates at Man United.
This "improvement" (currently that would be Evans and who else?) in the pool of players would ultimately result in many, many, players from Northern Ireland denied the opportunity to play International football.
As Northern Ireland fans, we accept we are underdogs - with a bite.
Players who wouldn't get near a, singular, Irish team, playing International football, and boxing above their weight. That's a joy.
Being patriotic is not "paranoia".
I have no real affinity with players from the Republic Of Ireland - they don't stir my International football passions.
Discussions like these are intersting on many levels - on a personal level, they serve to confirm why I could only ever support one team in International football - Northern Ireland.
Aye, I think anyone trying to persuade NI fans that the NI team should be abolished is wasting their time. I doubt the second group you mention is much larger (ie much more than 50% of the football-supporting population in NI), but if you've got some actual evidence to back your claim, let's see it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan the man
Some will, some won't. I'm reasonably content with the existing flag, although I'd prefer no crown on it as I'm not a royalist. I'd prefer a distinct anthem not shared with England, Britain as a whole or Liechtenstein.Quote:
Most of the current "NI fans" by nature will see little wrong with the current anthems issue (the flag issue is probably not entirely the IFA's fault)
Again some think that, many don't. There are plenty of alternatives- nonn-partisan folk instrumental, pop tune, new composition by Coulter or whoever. It may change in future.Quote:
I sometimes here nice words like "I would like a neutral anthem but hate Danny Boy/Ireland's Call so what can you do?"
Of course there is some hatred towards the Republic and local nationalists in NI. Sometimes inevitably this will be demonstrated at football matches or on the web. But a ****-take version of the Hokey cokey's hardly blatant hatred, any more than other fans enjoying others' defeats. Bit exaggerated, don't ye think?Quote:
There is also a thinly veiled hatred for the Republic, and by extension nationalist Ireland (which includes myself!). If you visit their website, Our Wee Country, you will see this blatantly. Indeed the poster Ealing Green on this website put this lovely ditty up there
Good man. As you've seen, the genuinely Irish NI fans ain't interested. So it won't happen.Quote:
It would not be good for the FAI or geninue Irish supporters, and that is all I care about really
Take that chip off your shoulder, Dan. Northern Ireland is an equally proper international team, regularly beats stronger countries and too occasionally challenges to qualify. But as a generally third-ranked/ mediocre achieving squad, it's actually quite similar to the South.Quote:
northern nationlists in the future have a clear path to represent a proper international team
One doesn't need to view with blinkers, or go off on a tangent about an Act of Parliament from 60 years ago. Many posters on this thread are saying the NI team should be abolished, even if they use the euphemism 'merged'. NI fans- 100% of them, self-evidently by definition- don't want this to happen. It's quite simple.Quote:
The point that some posters make about destroying 'their' team is valid to a certain extent, and I can see their point if one views the team with such blinkers
I'd welcome anyone in NI or out who wants to support the team. Similarly those who, even without supporting it and/ or preferring another, will at least tolerate it as they would any other. It's only the RoI fans who constantly have a go at NI that bother me, and who I feel the need the answer on threads like this one.Quote:
Sadly for the reasons stated above, 'their' team will never be 'my' team. And most "NI fans" do not seem to bothered about that
I'm glad the hostility is receding, this is a positive step. As a further anecdotal example, I go to NI matches regularly with two Roman Catholics. I know others. Not sure about the proportion of the support from nationalist backgrounds, but as above if they prefer to support other teams that's fine.Quote:
In this regard I know a lot of people from all over NI who live in the nationalist community, and while hostility to the team has receded somewhat, actual support is still very low. There are exceptions btw, I know 2 people who support NI (out of many!)
Come on, it doesn't demonstrate anything of the sort- everyone knows the NI side has- as well as an admittedly minority nationalist support- plenty of players, coaches etc. from nationalist backgrounds.Quote:
Darren Gibson case was quite depressing and sadly predictable. It demonstrated that the IFA wanted a Unionist-tinted team, but that nationalists had to play for it or else they had no international career
I felt we- NI, IFA, fans- handled the Gibson case badly. He wanted to play for the South's youth teams, made the choice early, has progressed and good luck to the guy. I'd be more iriated if someone like Shane Duffy, who's already played regularly for our u-19 and u-21, then went off to play for the South. To prevent that, I want the IFA to seek a deal with the FAI that any adult player- over 18- who turns out for one of those teams, qualifier or friendly, is thus thereafter.
Sorry Fly, you haven't. You've repeated how dense I am, without much reference to anything I've said here let alone any detailed explanation. You raised, for example, the d'Hondt system and Edmund Burke's theories on the slowness of political change. I don't actually disagree with much of your analysis of them; they're just irrelevant to an argument about why the NI team should be abolished. It just looks like shoehorning in a slew of random facts, just for the sake of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fly
I'm actually quite flattered at your obsessive interest in where I live and how often I post. As I'm sure most others on the thread realise, they're largely irrelevant. If you diasagree with what I say, just reply to it. To correct a few points- I've been reading and contributing to OWC since it started (as a mailing list) in 1999 I think. Similarly, on foot.ie since September 2003. I've used various names- including my real name originally- changing for various reasons including OWC regularly needing re-registration as it moved to larger servers, and a ban from foot.ie when a row about Luis Aragones and racism at Spanish international games got out of hand. OWC doesn't tend to feature threads about the NI side being abolished; they get deleted (I zapped one or two when I was a moderator myself some time back). Unfortunately, this thread on foot.ie is just the latest in a depressingly predictable series. They all say basically the same thing: 'let's take over the Nordies even though their team's rubbish and the fans a bunch of orange bigots'. I see the mods have renamed this one to reflect its predictability.
Sorry Janey, this makes no sense. Other international teams playing NI will do their best to put one over NI. Unless England are in the same group the other teams are unlikely to give them a second thought. I know of no evidence whatever that other countries are that bothered about Britain having four teams, just as there's no real fuss about Denmark having to or somwhere like Andorra (which is basically a duty-free and ski resprt jointly run by France and Spain) appearing in every FIFA/ UEFA competition. Nobody in Spain or China is particularly upset about there being a NI or Wales team- they're much more likely to use it as a justification for getting they're team (if, say, they're a Basque or Galician or one of those 48 nationalities you mentioned). Or they're insistent that autonomous regions aren't allowed to set up their own teams. Nobody- apart from a few stirrers in Ireland- gives a flying fcuk about abolishing any exisiting teams against their fans' wishes. Monaco's club side seems to do well enough in UEFA competitions. Are they really that bothered about not playing the World Cup? I think not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Janey Mac
Football's a precarious career, but a player good enough to feature regularly in the Champions' League later stages at 21 has a better chance than most. Compare that with the RoI international side which has reached one finals in the last 15 years. He's no need to envy anyone, least of all you.Quote:
I do feel sorry though for the likes of Evans who will never get a chance to play in a major competition - how he will envy most his team mates at Man United
Hardly a shock, but in direct contradiction of the IFA's 'Football For All'.
If they must be Hypocrites, why not come out and admit it?
Huh? The South seas? Are you aware of Malin Head?Quote:
it's actually quite similar to the South.
Not only is there no grasp of geography, but the Brits.not teach education in N.E. Ulster?Quote:
Compare that with the RoI international side which has reached one finals in the last 15 years. He's no need to envy anyone, least of all you.
It's two finals in 15 years;1994 & 2002, as opposed to None in 23 years and counting.....
Johnny Evans had better win a lot of club medals!!
;)
Funny enough, I was at a "Football For All" awards Dinner a couple of weeks ago - seems they're doing all right, given the amount of "nationalists" there, who enjoyed the evening.
It was magnificant to see such a diverse gathering of over 300 people involved in the sport in Northern Ireland - and none of the "nationalists" who received awards for their contribution refused their award.;)
GR made a point about Northern Irish society generally - equally, there are "nationalists" from Northern Ireland who hate the Northern Ireland team, and "unionists".
"Football For All" is about a heck of a lot more than attracting support from the "nationalist" community for the Northern Ireland team - but, hey, you carry on....
It has when you keep rambling on about 'denial of choice'.
So what is it about then?
Bully for you also. Seems from their main 'public' interface and that quote above, you have a long way to go in re-educating some of your fellow fans.....
If you feel so inclined, good luck.
Nothing "paranoid" about telling something for what it is - in this case, denial of choice.
"Football For All" is about exactly what it says on the tin - people from Northern Ireland (whether they be nationalist, unionist, neither, male, female, young, old, disabled, from whatever ethnic or religious background etc, etc, etc) enjoying the game of football.
But where does Walker in his article 'deny' choice?
And FFA is anti-discrimination. As in the anti-Irish & Ireland sentiments portrayed by some on that MB. Who clearly don't believe themselves to be Irish!
That is a very confused and irrational question, beyond repair.
With some reasonable guesswork, I think you mean to ask
'what part of the FIFA statutes of ELIG 2008 would have precluded a NI born player from declaring for the FAI in the times pre GFA?
If so
Afaics nothing, I never claimed there was.
I have only claimed that the terms of automatic citizenship equally available to all people on the Island, as was in written in the GFA and accepted into law by was influential in FIFA's position right from the beginning of the time of IFA objections.
I do believe, referring to the few quotes from FIFA legal dept at the time that such was the certainity about the equality of citizenship as was impressed upon the FIFA legal dept that the main article of eligibility did not use the term "territory of the Association" but used the all important term 'permanent nationality not dependent on residence' in article 15. The other articles of eligibility drafted in, referred to "territory of the association". Now the likes of Alex Bruce would not qualify.
Who knows how the FIFA legal department would have approached the IFA objections should the conditions of citizenship for NI born not been automatic, equal and voted upon by the people of Ireland. All I claim is that it was an important factor in drafting into the statutes 'permanent nationality not dependent on residence'.
Here you are supporting your contention that the IFA rejected the FIFA compromise to protect IFA autonomy.
I have said, if that was the reason then it was mistaken and claimed that the IFA rejected the compromise because they stubbornly believed they were 100% right.
Considering that part of the compromise over which the IFA have little or no control is already in practice, what autonomy have the IFA lost?
Considering now, the other other part of the compromise that is not in practice, namely that the IFA would be able select any Irish national, a part that the IFA would have total control of, what autonomy do you think the IFA would have lost?
It is their absolute right to define themselves as they see fit - same for me.
Unfortunately, they have capitulated to the myopic notion, expressed by many (including yourself) of what constitutes "Irish".
Equally, it isn't too hard to find "Anti Northern Ireland and British" sentiment on message boards.
Ironically some myopic thinkers claim to be "uniters". Bizarre.