Originally Posted by
cfdh_edmundo
Just out of interest why not Hodgson? To me he has a lot of the prerequisites, he's managed national teams successfully, taking a fairly medicore Switzerland to USA 1994 finishing second in a qualification group with Italy, Portgual and Scotland (who were better in 1992-4 than now) once at the World Cup they, like us, finished 2nd in the group and went out in the first knockouts (to Spain instead of Holland). He got them through topping a group for Euro 96 (which included them, Turkey, Sweden - who were 3rd at the WC94), all this was with a Swiss team that wasnt that great and man for man was probably worse than our team at the time. He also took a very poor Finland side to within 3 points of qualification for Euro 2008.
In terms of clubs he wasn't that great at Liverpool, but the club was in turmoil at the time with the Gillette and Hicks regieme ending and Henry taking over. It's not like Dalgelish did that much better the year after. He did well at West Brom and Fulham (initially saving them from relegation and then taking them to a Europa League final) and has won a lot of titles in Sweden and Denmark.
To me he seems like a good candidate, he's managed internationally, he's managed clubs in England (where the bulk of our squad play their football) and has even signed a few of our squad players like Long, Andrews, Duff (obviously now out of the picture for us) and (i think) Stephen Kelly. He's also got experience of the European game, his teams play dynamic football - at Fulham he would mix it up using wingers like Duff and Davies but also using pacey strikers like Johnston or targetmen (like Zamora) depending on what was required. If England get rid of him I would like to think the FAI would consider him a contender as well as Martin O'Neill.