Printable View
if onlyou you had of left it at the first part of your post but you got carried away and got caught up in hyperbole just like Dunphy does. Maybe subconciously that was your point.Quote:
Originally Posted by an_ceannaire
Oh Owls Fan, all opinions by their very nature are subjective and one could even go to state that all statements are subjective.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stojkovic
yeah i agree with you on all this, but its still not world cups and all that, more like moral victories and missed opportunities
I see it's being repeated at 2.25pm on TG4 this afternoon.
Watched it on tape last night. Enjoyed it apart from the large doses of the poison dwarf.
Interesting to see all those games I was at: Hungary at home, Malta away, Portugal away (3-0 :mad: - worst game ever from a weather, facilities and results wise), Stuttgart, Gelsenkirchen, Hannover. Giant Stadium, Orlando etc etc and of course Gary Mackay (wasn't at it but took the day off to watch it).
The only tears that interested me in that programme were Jack's own when he spoke about the Anfield experience. A great manager and a great man who gave me the greatest moments of my life.
Pity it ended up with the poison dwarf having the last word when he said that prior to Jack "soccer had been a game played by only Dublin gurriers". My wife chirped in when she heard that with "Only when he (Dunphy) was playing". :D:D
saw the last half hour of it. very good.
thought it was ok..stories have been done to death and there is not much unseen footage..jack speaking now was nice. dunphy as always is not worth speaking about
The trouble is, if someone repeats a lie often enough, it becomes fact. Dunphy said as usual that "Jack was always happy just to qualify" when history shows otherwise. In both World Cups we advanced from our groups (Last 8 in Italia 90, last 16 in USA 94 (with an aging team)) and a hair's breath from the semi-final in Euro 88. This nonsense doesn't stand up to scrutiny but I still hear a number ofQuote:
Originally Posted by onenilgameover
Dunphy(sh)ites repeating it.
I was also interested to hearing a couple of the players saying they really thought they could beat Italy in 1990 and were devastated at the result. Just happy to qualify my ........
is this online? id love to get a torrent of it.
I know .. it's painful for ex-pats reading this thread!! Should have asked the mammy to tape it.Quote:
Originally Posted by paul_oshea
[QUOTE=OwlsFan;847158]The trouble is, if someone repeats a lie often enough, it becomes fact. Dunphy said as usual that "Jack was always happy just to qualify" when history shows otherwise. In both World Cups we advanced from our groups (Last 8 in Italia 90, last 16 in USA 94 (with an aging team)) and a hair's breath from the semi-final in Euro 88. This nonsense doesn't stand up to scrutiny but I still hear a number of
Dunphy(sh)ites repeating it.
I agree with Dunphy's view... sure it was great that we qualified for three tounaments with jack...but i always felt that in 1990 we should of taken the game more to Italy as they were very beatable...also Jack tactics during the 1992 Euro qualifiers meant we blew a real chance of not just getting to the finals but also winning it, as I believe that the team were then at the peak of their powers , 1994 came too late for them.... for me Jack's negative attitude was summed up by his comment after we'd blown a 3-1 lead away to Poland and finished 3-3 when he said "... drawing 3-3 was better than winning as it gives the Poles something to play for against England in their final game.." he may of being trying to gloss over a disaster but IMO summed up his negativity.
My defining moment during the 1990 World cup was when in a packed pub , after the egypt game and Dunphy's misquoted comments, the cameras focussed on Dunphy... " I shouted , ther's a man who tells it as it is..." the rest of the pub started booing and I was threatened by a group of angry fools who accused me of treason !! plonkers.
We then had to enjure that idiotic comment from McCarthy when he said ".. I'm ashamed that Eamon Dunphy is Irish.." and then a few days later Charltons ignorance when he came into a press conference and said he wouldn't take any questions Dunphy, thus revelaing himself as a bully.
As for what Charlton did to Brady...well that was simply unnesssary and unforgivable.
This should be fun
I could upload it somewhere but I would edit out all the Dunphy contributions.Quote:
Originally Posted by paul_oshea
Then it would be decent enough.
Then I would edit out all the footage that is widely available.
Then I would edit out the well worn stories that are available on other tapes.
Then all that's left is Jack, poor daft bugger down mine.
Firstly, I find it ironic that someone with a Rovers' Avatar should be defending Dunphy (the man who vocally and in print supported the Kilcoyne's sale of Milltown).Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcio Jack
Secondly, you agree with which view? The one where he said we were only happy to qualify when it is clear we did far more than just qualify.
Like every team which plays in Rome takes the game to Italy :eek: We limited them to a few half chances, McGrath might have scored and but for a Bonner mistake, we might have taken that one to penos as well. We were THAT close to a semi-final of the World Cup but of course we should have attacked Italy and played them off the park with Chris Morris, Mick McCarthy and other such world class players.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcio Jack
Those comments were made in an attempt to put a gloss on a terrible result. Managers do it all the time and I read nothing in to it at the time and still don't. It's camera speak. Jack's "negative" team had scored 3 away to Poland but thanks to some mistakes at the back, not by Jack who wasn't playing, they snatched a draw. I agree that his team was at its peak at that stage. His "negative" team had outplayed England at Wembley (Houghton missed a sitter in the last minute) and but for Lineker snatching one in Poland, we would have made it. Lucky Jack I don't think so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcio Jack
"A man who tells it as it is." - what a joke. A man who sees it from his own narrow perspective and given a chance would p*ss on any parade so as to keep himself in the limelight. A man who hasn't even managed Ballyfermot U11s and yet constantly criticises successful managers. The "traitor" stuff is of course rubbish but Dunphy loves to play on this as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcio Jack
I too am ashamed that Dunphy is Irish (no other country would tolerate his appeal to the base instincts of many football fans) and if someone had constantly used his role in the media and public television to portray me as an "Andy Capp" figure, I wouldn't talk to him either and neither would you I suspect.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcio Jack
The hug he gave him when he was sent off against Bulgaria? Or the substitution against Germany? Big deal. Media hype. I was at the game. I thought it was a good substitution as we were being overrun in midfield. I didn't think about humiliation until I saw a few journalists making a big deal of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcio Jack
Jack Charlton: two world cups and our only Euro championship. Hero.
Dunphy: never won a game when playing for Ireland and journeyman at Millwall. Buffoon.
Happy? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilMcD
!) Playing the host nation in Rome, risky business taking the game to them, easy to say with hindsight, that was a very tight negative World Cup, most sides played that way, look at the semi finalists. It could have gone either way against Italy, 9 time out of 10 that save from Bonner would have gone anywhere except straight to Schilaci, that's football. They weren't that beatable anyway, they were the best team in it and got beaten in the semis by a team who took the game to them far less then we did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcio Jack
2) Utter rubbish, if David O'Leary had stuck with Jack's tactics of 'if in doubt put it out' rather then trying to play his way out of a tight spot on the sideline we'd have beaten Poland and qualified. Our tactics were spot on in that group, it was the best we played under Jack. I agree we could have won that tournament but it was obvious to anyone that his comment about the Poland draw was an attempt to find a positive. IS that the exact quote anyway?
3) No offence but you must be a proper miserable get for that to be the defining moment of that World Cup for you rather then O'Leary's penalty or Sheedy's goal or the sight of the Irish support at all the games. The Egypt game was a debacle but it's not as if we lost to Costa Rica like the Scots did. Sometimes there's bad results and bad performances, that's football. I don't recall McCarthy saying that, are you not getting confused with what it was wrongly reported that Dunphy had said? As for Charlton being a bully, sometimes you fight fire with fire, Dunphy's always been a bully himself.
4) I agree that Charlton should have waited till half time to hook Brady off but he was obviously a passenger in that game and was finished as a player at that stage following his last knee injury. He would have made the Euro 88 squad had he not been suspended and then injured and the suggestion that he should have been in the WC 90 squad that some have made is laughable. People also tend to forget that Liam had been gash for Ireland for a number of years prior to Charltons arrival and much as he didn't like the role he had to play his most effective spell for Ireland since his younger days came in the role under Jack. Dunphy regulalrly slated Brady for his performances for Ireland in the early 80's when he was at the peak of his powers in the club game.
People tend to forget we'd not qualified for anything pre 88, we were effective under Charlton because we had a plan and everybody played to it. It suited the game at the time, it's obviously moved on since. It's not eay winning tournaments but we weren't far off, who knows what might have been, we may not have even qualified playing a different way.
Who was the only player to start every game in the qualifiers for Euro 88, was it Brady.
While I agree 100% with everything else in your post I need to repeat a previous posting: http://foot.ie/showthread.php?p=6425...hy#post642599:Quote:
Originally Posted by OwlsFan
Sorry to have to correct this (no I really am sorry)....... but old Eamo Grumpy was on the winning side on two occasions:
Ireland 2 -1 Turkey 16-Nov 1966
Czechoslovakia 1 - 2 Ireland 22-Nov 1967
Average player, sh1te pundit.
In a round about way, reminds me of how Charlton retrospectively criticised Kevin Sheedy for playing a short ball to John Aldridge's feet that resulted in lost possession against the Italians and ultimately the Italians goal in Italia 90.Quote:
Originally Posted by Drumcondra 69er
Charlton contended that if Sheedy had have played the ball into the channel instead of short for Aldo - we'd have retained possession and the danger was gone.
I still think the Italians just about deserved to shade that game and would most likely have got the winning goal in the second half anyway.
He also criticised Terry Phelan's performance against Holland in USA 94. After the concession of the first Dutch goal, he said "I could have rung his neck". He wasn't the only one.
that is one of my most vivid memories of around the early 90s soccer and beyond. The reason for that was not his stupid mistake but his interview afterwards where he wouldn't admit to it and played it off. much like his rugby counterpart flute conor oshea.Quote:
He also criticised Terry Phelan's performance against Holland in USA 94. After the concession of the first Dutch goal, he said "I could have rung his neck". He wasn't the only one.
I stand corrected but if I keep repeating that theory (like Dunphy), it may stick ;).Quote:
Originally Posted by fergalr
That Czech game resulted in someone (Germans?) sending us a crate of champage because it meant them qualifying for a tournament.
Entertainment value.
I like him, for the above reason. Im not foolish enough to believe that every word he utters is the truth, or that every windmill he tilts at is a justifiable target, I just think his undeniable passion (for the international game, anyway), his presence, and his obvious intelligence adds something to the RTE commentary process which has stopped the national broadcaster's football programmes turning into something similar to the farce of "Nice blokes saying nice things to a nice man in a nice studio" which bizarrely passes for in-depth commentary & analysis in other quarters.