Printable View
They really did nothing for the Premier this season - won a couple of games and just folded. So much for the team that would last 1000 years. Is Dahamsta actually managing them in anything other than name? If he is, fair enough. But if he is not interested - good night.
I was keeping an eye on them and form was always ****e and no line up set.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluebeard
Yeah, no idea who's in control of them but whoever it is, they dont seem to be active at all really. Although they did log in on the 23rd after I sent a reminder...Quote:
Originally Posted by holidaysong
Not too happy with my change report, only 6 visible increases, at least I had no neagative ones I suppose.
Squad is very thin and a really need a quality young striker, there's a real danger the three older lads might retire at the end of the season.
Any VIPS interested my 7 skilled 24 year old striker is for sale, he's got a good record for me and he's a leader, he'd do very well in the lower divisions.
Jeez, I only had 3 visible increases even though nearly everybody got the wee plus sign :(
Thanks, I feel better now :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A
Decent result against Harps for me there. Was totally confused for most of the match though :)
15 average form is what you should be aiming for really. Bit higher for players that are 16-20 and lower for late 20s upward.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A
Has anyone ever waited 31 days for a youth only to find out they have 2 skill bars, are injury prone and for some reason their first name is Felix even though Slovak names are set.
That's what most people get Infadel.
Your xpert rating is at 100; you need 95 to have two private league teams so when your VIP runs out you would lose the team that has it's change report next. You'd need an xpert rating of 115 to keep all of your sides.Quote:
Originally Posted by dancinpants
So when is the new season guna kick off?! bad hammering tonight for me, 4nil at home!
Cheers Dman. Don't want all 4 teams...can't be arsed juggling them anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by DmanDmythDledge
Ouch! There's a tactic I won't be trying again!
Ah yes, 343. :)
I'm really surprised though..I forgot to set tactics and left out a few players I wanted to play, but it turned around some red arrows.
What playing style did you use? 343 is actually quite good against 352, it just would have needed defensive playing style (perhaps even very defensive due to the difference in the strength of each side).Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A
343 normal. 6-0 result, but obviously strength difference over-rides pretty much everything except the form gain for both sides.
Wanted to play Hedman, Cobh and Haggander, but forgot and had youths in...didn't even put in a playmaker. :o
I actually threw in a good few of my own young lads seeing as it's preseason and they could do with a lift.
Still, it seems to have helped my form if anything, weirdly enough.
Nice win against Dillonman in pre season for me. I see I have the famous UCD in the first game of the season.
Aye, true. Just making a general point on the use of it though. :) A particular formation is never too defensive or offensive to use, whether that be at home or away in >90% of situations as long as you get the playing style correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by dfx-
Played against another 3-4-3 normal today in the Master League. 4-1 hammering. More of that please - on the back of a 2-3 win against 4-3-3 last week with me playing offensive 3-5-2 away. I love playing 4-3-3 or 3-4-3 :D
They were fairly old though..they've three 39 year olds in their squad.