Originally Posted by
pineapple stu
In fairness, a Fifpro survey for me trumps a random punter claiming extra knowledge because he's in the terraces each week.
Now if the Fifpro survey included First Division players (and I don't know if it does or not), then you've a valid counter-argument against it as the FD would certainly skew the results towards part-time players.
Edit - in fact, read the article (duh)...
It does include First Division players. In 2016 (when the survey dates from), the PD/FD split was 12 v 8 teams. So if you assume the players were split accordingly, and that all the FD players had second jobs, the report is saying that 40% of PD players also have second jobs. Which is still a lot.
If Limerick - splashing the cash in the FD that year - had some full-time players, then that would reduce the number of PD full-timers.