NI Westminster Election 2017

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • backstothewall
    Seasoned Pro
    • Sep 2006
    • 2881

    #106
    Originally posted by GatherRound
    1 With you on the transport improvements I think. Isn't the A1 from Lisburn to the border just a couple of bridges at Rathfriland or wherever short of being effectively a motorway anyway?
    It is. But there is also that roundabout at Hillsborough, and the mess that is Sprucefield.

    I give you. The BTTW Motorways NI plan... motorways.jpg

    Originally posted by DannyInvincible
    As I said above, unionists expecting nationalism to compromise on the compromises isn't in any way reasonable or acceptable and that's why we have this impasse
    Amen. I'm a floating nationalist, but SF get all the room they need on this from me. The DUP can't be allowed to welch on the deal. Neither can the British. I'll back them all the way to the gates of hell over this one.
    Last edited by backstothewall; 05/07/2017, 10:19 PM.
    Bring Back Belfast Celtic F.C.

    Comment

    • Gather round
      First Team
      • Apr 2006
      • 2045

      #107
      Originally posted by DannyInvincible
      Are you referring to nationalist parties as being uncompromising? If so, care to elaborate exactly as to why?
      Rather than co-operate in a local structure to address major problems in health, housing, education and the rest, SF have thrown their toys over

      a) a language whose tiny minority of conversational speakers are already supported by the state

      b) a backlog of historical investigations which they don't really want (given the likely result of senior figures being embarrassed by links to criminality or worse, as Brit agents). It's doublethink, basically

      c) a law on gay marriage which only needs a free vote at Stormont to be enacted. As Jim Allister seems to have given up and the UUP are lukewarm the petition of concern seems unlikely

      I have elaborated as above upthread and on parallel discussions...look, nobody's claiming the DUP aren't taking the **** big time. But the issues are bigger than just responding to them

      Nationalist parties wholeheartedly believe in parity of esteem and Martin McGuinness was well-known for his cross-communal outreach efforts on behalf of Sinn Féin
      They don't believe in taking health, housing education and the rest seriously, so I'm afraid I'm not that impressed that they're sufficiently on-message to parrot a few slogans (if not quite enough to have them fully tested by Nolan, Carruthers and co). What's Marty's reputation for outreach (not that I immediately recognise it) got to do with anything?

      As I said above, unionists expecting nationalism to compromise on the compromises isn't in any way reasonable or acceptable and that's why we have this impasse
      Riamh! Riamh! Riamh!

      If unionists aren't keen on such however, then they can give the moaning about "Irish government impartiality" a rest; their complaints carry very little weight or credibility
      Well to be fair to them, they aren't really moaning in those terms- probably for the reasons you describe. I merely mention the issue to illustrate my claim that expecting either government to be evermore neutral isn't realistic.

      Even a compromised Corbyn government would be much more preferable than a continuation of Tory rule, although I think we're agreed on that
      Indeed. Disagree on the 'wasted votes' thing. I suggest that under FPTP and where most seats aren't marginal (only 10% changed hands this time) you should generally vote for who you support. If a Manchester voter prefers Corbyn to Lucas it's reasonable enough to vote for Lucy Powell- given the size of constituencies here few ever have contact with their MP

      you're subtly (perhaps unwittingly) admitting that, even if their status had been dealt a somewhat diminishing blow then, they were still undoubtedly top dog
      No the point was deliberate, no subtlety intended. I recognise reality- Unionists still dominated and often abused politics during the Troubles, large sections of the Nationalist population were routinely harassed and so on. I got through secondary school in Belfast without ever being stopped by the Army or Police- although that said I was intimidated out of primary school. It wasn't much fun around the interface, on either side.

      Originally posted by BttW
      Amen. I'm a floating nationalist, but SF get all the room they need on this from me. The DUP can't be allowed to welch on the deal. Neither can the British. I'll back them all the way to the gates of hell over this one
      I vote Green, so am neither a floating nor any other sort (submerged?) of party unionist. In the abstract, I'm all for the DUP getting a kicking- but in practice, I'm more interested in public services. Back them to the gates of the Mater or Royal and then stop?

      Comment

      • backstothewall
        Seasoned Pro
        • Sep 2006
        • 2881

        #108
        Originally posted by Gather round
        I vote Green, so am neither a floating nor any other sort (submerged?) of party unionist. In the abstract, I'm all for the DUP getting a kicking- but in practice, I'm more interested in public services. Back them to the gates of the Mater or Royal and then stop?
        Health, education, etc are undoubtedly more important than the Irish language. But this isn't about the Irish language. It's about respect. Cutting the grants for the kids going to the gaeltacht was the straw that broke the camel's back.

        The DUP obviously don't want to treat nationalism with respect. It's time to put manners on the *******s.
        Bring Back Belfast Celtic F.C.

        Comment

        • DannyInvincible
          Capped Player
          • Sep 2006
          • 11521

          #109
          GR; I'd broadly echo the sentiment of what BTTW said above. Power-sharing was agreed on the basis of compromises. You can't seriously have one community or set of parties being disrespected or played for fools and expect them to continue demeaning themselves while the other set lord it over them and take their compliance for granted. After putting up with over half a century of discrimination and prejudicial treatment in a hostile statelet, you don't see how it would be demeaning for nationalists to now compromise on the compromises? It's easy for unionists to be blasé about promises, respect and reciprocation when they've always been top dogs. They've never had to demand or fight for respect since they've always called the shots and been in the privileged position of being able to take things for granted.

          Originally posted by Gather round
          What's Marty's reputation for outreach (not that I immediately recognise it) got to do with anything?
          Meeting and shaking hands with members of the British royal family, attending - along with other nationalists - the Stormont 2015 Remembrance Day ceremony (where the gesture was spat back in his face by an ambush in the form of an impromptu rendition of 'GSTQ' initiated by TUV pipsqueak Sammy Morrison) and attending NI football matches (despite Arlene's churlish refusal to attend an Ireland game) are examples of McGuinness' efforts at reaching out. What are unionism's equivalents?

          Outreach is a form of compromise too that carries significant political risks in terms of potential loss of face, reputation and credibility. It's political trailblazing, more often than not, and isn't always going to be highly regarded within one's own community.

          I mentioned McGuinness' outreach because it's indicative of a reconciliatory approach and respect that unionism has so far demonstrated itself as being either unwilling to reciprocate or incapable of reciprocating.

          Riamh! Riamh! Riamh!
          This impasse isn't quite the nationalist equivalent of Paisley's "Never! Never! Never!" though, is it? Paisley roared that with venom as he had an aversion to compromise. In the current day, nationalism has already compromised and simply expects delivery on the promises made in return for that compromise. That's entirely reasonable and only fair. In reality then, it's still a case of unionist intransigence. As ever. As ever. As ever...

          Well to be fair to them, they aren't really moaning in those terms- probably for the reasons you describe. I merely mention the issue to illustrate my claim that expecting either government to be evermore neutral isn't realistic.
          The DUP's Christopher Stalford was the other week having a go at the Irish government for expressing support for an Irish language act and the legal recognition of same-sex marriage. He was rather tediously claiming it contravened some imagined duty of impartiality because these campaigns just so happened to be supported by Sinn Féin too.

          Speaking of Stalford, it's amazing to think he's only three years older than me - he's 34 - but looks old enough to be my da!

          Last edited by DannyInvincible; 10/07/2017, 2:55 AM.
          My blog.
          FIFA Player Eligibility in the Context of Ireland: The Actual Rules, the Real Facts and Dispelling the Prevailing Myths.

          Comment

          • Gather round
            First Team
            • Apr 2006
            • 2045

            #110
            Originally posted by BttW
            Health, education, etc are undoubtedly more important than the Irish language. But this isn't about the Irish language. It's about respect
            Health, education etc. are more important than respect...

            From a mainstream Unionist POV (which I understand while not fully sharing), it's pointless presenting the Language row as disrespectful to Nationalists alone. The whole point is to annoy Unionists. Either once enacted you'll have 10% of public jobs reserved for speakers, a Commissioner with powers around new criminal offences, and new street signs in Mount Vernon. Or (as Mairtin O'Muilleoir seemed to be suggesting in a recent interview on the BBC), you won't need any of those things. In which case, what's the row all about?

            Cutting the grants for the kids going to the gaeltacht was the straw that broke the camel's back
            I sympathised at the time, but not now. You have to weigh the deliberate slight and the upset to the kids against those bigger issues. Have a whip round or take them to the mini-Gaeltacht in Baile Andy or wherever.

            Originally posted by DI
            You can't seriously have one community or set of parties being disrespected
            Agree fully as per reply to BttW above

            What are unionism's equivalents [to Marty's outreach]?
            I see most of that as little more than stunts. Which isn't to completely dismiss them, jaw-jaw around PR oppos is always better than war-war. As for the detail- Arlene has been practising her Irish skills, Jeff Donaldson went to the hurling, Baby Doc's love-in with the McGuinness family.

            Don't be too harsh on Arlene's unwillingness to watch negative football. She may have been scarred for life watching it at Stangmore or Ballinamallard?

            Speaking of Stalford, it's amazing to think he's only three years older than me - he's 34 - but looks old enough to be my da!
            You're only 31? But those 800 years of hurt living in da Orange Statelet

            Talking of prematurely aged hacks, at Lord's Cricket Ground in London on Saturday I met eccentric and very right-wing Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg. He's often described as the member for 1917 and was in the news last week at the birth of his fifth son. The youngster and his elder brothers are all named after Medieval archbishops of Canterbury

            Catholics- you gotta love 'em

            Comment

            • Eminence Grise
              Seasoned Pro
              • May 2010
              • 2825

              #111
              Sixth son, called Sixtus. You can't keep undercounting Catholics forever, GR.
              Hello, hello? What's going on? What's all this shouting, we'll have no trouble here!
              - E Tattsyrup.

              Comment

              • Gather round
                First Team
                • Apr 2006
                • 2045

                #112
                Originally posted by Eminence Grise
                Sixth son, called Sixtus. You can't keep undercounting Catholics forever, GR.
                The clan includes one sister as below. I'm just about in favor of letting women vote, but not sure if Jake is...

                Alfred Wulfric Leyson Pius
                Mary Anne Charlotte Emma
                Thomas Wentworth Somerset Dunstan
                Peter Theodore Alphege
                Anselm Charles Fitzwilliam
                Sixtus Dominic Boniface Christopher

                Mary does have an extravagantly named aunt though- Annunziata. She was also a Tory candidate. When Dave Cameron suggested 'Nancy Mogg' would sound less posh, she told him to p*ss o(r)ff

                Comment

                • backstothewall
                  Seasoned Pro
                  • Sep 2006
                  • 2881

                  #113
                  Originally posted by Gather round
                  Health, education etc. are more important than respect...
                  This is where we have to part ways. They aren't. They aren't because those other things can't be done correctly until respect is sorted out. It's intolerable to go back a situation where even modest projects like The Narrow Water bridge are blocked because of who would be using them. The DUP, or whoever else unionists choose to represent them, will have to accept that Irishness and Britishness must have an equal status in our society. An Irish Language Act (which delivers real change) has become a totemic for nationalism this last few months imho. As the symbol of the change in attitude we need to see from unionism Stormont isn't coming back until it happens.
                  Bring Back Belfast Celtic F.C.

                  Comment

                  • Gather round
                    First Team
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 2045

                    #114
                    Originally posted by backstothewall
                    The DUP, or whoever else unionists choose to represent them, will have to accept that Irishness and Britishness must have an equal status in our society
                    The problem is less unequal status than mutual mistrust. I mean, we can have another set-piece deal like GFA or StA anytime, but it won't change that.

                    An Irish Language Act (which delivers real change) has become a totemic for nationalism this last few months imho
                    What real change? As I mentioned above, MO'M downplayed it when interviewed with Kellie Armstrong? It can't be piecemeal and totemic at the same time...

                    As the symbol of the change in attitude we need to see from unionism Stormont isn't coming back until it happens
                    Foster's attitude does sem to have changed as I mentioned. See you on the Hill (Not that I have any great faith in Stormont, like)

                    Comment

                    • backstothewall
                      Seasoned Pro
                      • Sep 2006
                      • 2881

                      #115
                      Originally posted by Gather round
                      What real change? As I mentioned above, MO'M downplayed it when interviewed with Kellie Armstrong? It can't be piecemeal and totemic at the same time...
                      One of the leaks was bilingual road signs on motorways. If that is typical of the provisions it does indeed offer change which is simultaneously real and symbolic.

                      Also. I forgot to say above. Stalford is weird looking. He looks like a secondary villain from one of the 90s batman movies
                      Bring Back Belfast Celtic F.C.

                      Comment

                      • Gather round
                        First Team
                        • Apr 2006
                        • 2045

                        #116
                        Originally posted by backstothewall
                        One of the leaks was bilingual road signs on motorways. If that is typical of the provisions it does indeed offer change which is simultaneously real and symbolic
                        Do we need to speculate on leaks- M O'M has played down likely detail in public interview as I mentioned?

                        I'd expect a blue sign pointing to An Iuraigh and Baile XML. Possibly not to Lios na gCearrbhach* and Droichead na Banna. I mean as the man said above, all the motorways are in Unionist areas.

                        * could be a gamble all right (pun intended)

                        Stalford is weird looking. He looks like a secondary villain from one of the 90s batman movies
                        You about to go all homo-erotic on us, Wallsy? He seems a well turned-out if slightly fogeyish young man

                        Stalford is clearly a bit of a bigot and would admit as much, but there's good reason for him to be fronting for the DUP. The alternative is an ageing buffoon (Campbell, Wilson) or dinosaur-denier (Poots, Mancausla)

                        Comment

                        • BonnieShels
                          Coach
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 12090

                          #117
                          Originally posted by Gather round
                          Do we need to speculate on leaks- M O'M has played down likely detail in public interview as I mentioned?

                          I'd expect a blue sign pointing to An Iuraigh and Baile XML. Possibly not to Lios na gCearrbhach* and Droichead na Banna. I mean as the man said above, all the motorways are in Unionist areas.

                          * could be a gamble all right (pun intended)
                          Ah that fabled home of Irish computing...

                          Crois Mhic Lionnáin
                          DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?

                          Comment

                          • backstothewall
                            Seasoned Pro
                            • Sep 2006
                            • 2881

                            #118
                            I think motorways is a decent compromise. It has several advantages.

                            1. It avoids a sectarian carve up where prod areas have don't have bilingual signs, but kathlik areas do.
                            2. Most signs being up on very high gantry will make life more difficult for the paint pot warriors. After a few Darwin Awards are gumiven out they should be safe enough.
                            Bring Back Belfast Celtic F.C.

                            Comment

                            Working...