pineapple stu
28/09/2005, 12:31 PM
Actually Stu, Harps ran a profit of 9% last year, so it is applicable.
Those figures were for turnover, not income/profit as you stated. There's no way Harps made E375k profit, being 9% of turnover!! In any case, a Harps director independently gave the E375k figure for turnover here as well. Obviously, profit is just as important as turnover.
Did UCD pull in €400k plus last year? How much of that was direct funding?
The report says E400k, which I assume is from our accounts. I'm not in a position to argue against that. If by direct funding you mean non-college-grant income, I believe you'd be looking at something like 90%+.
Those figures were for turnover, not income/profit as you stated. There's no way Harps made E375k profit, being 9% of turnover!! In any case, a Harps director independently gave the E375k figure for turnover here as well. Obviously, profit is just as important as turnover.
Did UCD pull in €400k plus last year? How much of that was direct funding?
The report says E400k, which I assume is from our accounts. I'm not in a position to argue against that. If by direct funding you mean non-college-grant income, I believe you'd be looking at something like 90%+.