View Full Version : Limerick Premier Division 2005/06
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
[
16]
17
Noddy
18/05/2006, 10:26 AM
[QUOTE=Old keeper]
Its obvious that the LDMC are waiting on the outcome of tonights games before they decide their own outcome of the Carew Pk v Regional game (in all fairness its the only decision out of all last weeks games that hasnt been sorted yet)
And dont use that excuse of them waiting on a refs report, how long does it take for a ref to hand in a 2 or 3 line report, stating that Carew Pk couldnt field a team and Regional were ready to play.
Pike win the league tonight and all the pressure is off the LDMC about making a decision as nobody will care the outcome of the Carew Pk V Regional game.
The LDMC just dont have the balls to make the big calls and its as simple as that.
Have to agree with you.
To answer your other question. Going by pike's website, keith hartnett is their top scorer with 15, david morris 14, don't know if you can call him a striker or not as he seems to have a new position every few weeks. Pa moloney has 11. Nabs has 5 he has been injured alot this season. Nabs hasn't done it this season after a great first season. Pike have always struggled to score goals over the last few seasons They've had a lot of strikers too, shane o'connor, frankie stewart, gerry o'connell. It may be down to the strikers but it has to be said they are not a creative side and don't produce alot of chances
I still don't think JOC would do any better than what they have. He wouldn't suit pike's game at all IMO.
widow
18/05/2006, 10:56 AM
surprised that fella nabs has only 5 goals this year. he's unstoppable when he wants to be.
widow
18/05/2006, 10:59 AM
well done to pike on winning the league, carew park are gone. Pike could lose the next two games and still win it.
abbeyvale
18/05/2006, 11:31 AM
[QUOTE=abbeyvale]
Have to agree with you.
To answer your other question. Going by pike's website, keith hartnett is their top scorer with 15, david morris 14, don't know if you can call him a striker or not as he seems to have a new position every few weeks. Pa moloney has 11. Nabs has 5 he has been injured alot this season. Nabs hasn't done it this season after a great first season. Pike have always struggled to score goals over the last few seasons They've had a lot of strikers too, shane o'connor, frankie stewart, gerry o'connell. It may be down to the strikers but it has to be said they are not a creative side and don't produce alot of chances
I still don't think JOC would do any better than what they have. He wouldn't suit pike's game at all IMO.
So all in all Pa Moloney is Pikes top golascoring striker with 11 goals??
You cant tell me that JOC wouldnt score more than 11 goals all season if he was playing with Pike, regardless of how uncreative Pike are/were.
the only 1
18/05/2006, 12:16 PM
[QUOTE=Noddy]
So all in all Pa Moloney is Pikes top golascoring striker with 11 goals??
You cant tell me that JOC wouldnt score more than 11 goals all season if he was playing with Pike, regardless of how uncreative Pike are/were.
hey alan ur obsessed with joc have u a thing for him?
abbeyvale
18/05/2006, 12:55 PM
[QUOTE=abbeyvale]
hey alan ur obsessed with joc have u a thing for him?
No but Pa Mul should have as he clearly needs a good striker
l.f.c......
18/05/2006, 3:40 PM
[QUOTE=l.f.c......]
If that was the case why did Regional turn up sunday morning with a full squad and Carew had only 8??
It was said after an oscar trainer match against cork at that time carew were still very much in title race if carew were going for the league last week you would hardly think they would turn up with 8 players do you. 8 players turned up because there is noting to play for simply as that im not saying its right far from it the players should of turning up. regional had a full squad there because there were trying to get a game played before there lawson semi
Dirk Diggler
18/05/2006, 4:11 PM
Are they going to turn up tonight for the boro game?
Dirk Diggler
18/05/2006, 4:14 PM
Pike have really deserved this trophy, they've bin made work in every game they've played this year. They got no favours off anyone. Which is only right and a proper way to win the league
abbeyvale
19/05/2006, 9:08 AM
Pike have really deserved this trophy, they've bin made work in every game they've played this year. They got no favours off anyone. Which is only right and a proper way to win the league
Mungret 0-4 Pike
Did the Carew v Boro match go ahead? Not that it matters
Happy Zapper
19/05/2006, 2:15 PM
Pike have really deserved this trophy, they've bin made work in every game they've played this year. They got no favours off anyone. Which is only right and a proper way to win the league
i would agree with you there Dirk, whats happening there next year with the departure of Pa Mul. Some new players needed with nabs not performing and ronan hanrahan going to aisling. Will it be a case of Dec Casey and Kev Fitzgerald and will this mean Ian Bennis will be keeping goal?
Happy Zapper
19/05/2006, 2:16 PM
To Noddy.. good to see pike spreading rumours about other clubs players again. lets wait and see who goes were Next season!!!!
I think abbey has started the ball rolling on that front
Old keeper
19/05/2006, 6:43 PM
Old Keeper--------fair play to you for defending your point of view.. But the ldmc remind me of the head pigs in Animal Farm..." all pigs are equal, but some pigs are more equal than others" Having had dealings with this bunch(they are not all bad) i have to agree with some of the posts on this thread.. if you vote for the right people you can bassically pick your matches, avoid suspensions and cancel matches.... i dont blame all of the ldmc but there are a few people who run it as a favour club...
Hi Leather
You are right the LDMC has for many years been the recipient of very harsh criticism and deservedly so!. the committee has never been transparent in its dealings and has left it's self open to rumor. I think however that the winds of change are sweeping on and if the current pace is maintained then next season will see a very transparent decision making process and happer clubs. With regard to how decisions are made, the committee has no option but to wait for reports before making decisions.
leather
20/05/2006, 10:03 AM
old keeper, just after the ldmc web site started i spoke to member of council and in passing said that i thought that it was a great idea. the response was as follows " web site,terrible idea, too much information" . i hope you suceed in making it more transparent but with the likes of that comment best of luck...
Old keeper
22/05/2006, 10:49 AM
Hi all. time to put your money where your mouth is. I am designing the database for the season 2006-2007. Please let me have your views on the type of info you think should be on the ldmc website. mail to info@ldmc.ie
Thanks
Happy Zapper
22/05/2006, 2:11 PM
who has been relegated and promoted this year?
Happy Zapper
22/05/2006, 2:25 PM
Hi all. time to put your money where your mouth is. I am designing the database for the season 2006-2007. Please let me have your views on the type of info you think should be on the ldmc website. mail to info@ldmc.ie
Thanks
Its good to see the effort you are putting in old keeper and i think everyone should offer as much support as they can. My two cents
if you are doing a database of players in limerick I would suggest that when players are being registered it should be mandatory they fill out a player profile sheet accompanied with a passport size photo, that way you have the information to hand to put on the site and u will not be depending on club sites to keep their web pages up to date. It would be a good feature on the LDMC site. Clubs that dont submit the info cannot register players simple really. Good luck trying to swing that one.
Would not mind seeing club sponsors getting some coverage on the site also, it can only help junior clubs for the future.
Old keeper
22/05/2006, 3:27 PM
Its good to see the effort you are putting in old keeper and i think everyone should offer as much support as they can. My two cents
if you are doing a database of players in limerick I would suggest that when players are being registered it should be mandatory they fill out a player profile sheet accompanied with a passport size photo, that way you have the information to hand to put on the site and u will not be depending on club sites to keep their web pages up to date. It would be a good feature on the LDMC site. Clubs that dont submit the info cannot register players simple really. Good luck trying to swing that one.
Would not mind seeing club sponsors getting some coverage on the site also, it can only help junior clubs for the future.
Thanks for the input
There is a proposed rule change to introduce Photo registration for next season (with your suggestion in mind) this will be voted on at the AGM so get your club delegates to back it.
Club sponsors can be placed on the club pages it just needs someone to mail the details in and they will be posted.
the only 1
22/05/2006, 4:37 PM
Hi Leather
You are right the LDMC has for many years been the recipient of very harsh criticism and deservedly so!. the committee has never been transparent in its dealings and has left it's self open to rumor. I think however that the winds of change are sweeping on and if the current pace is maintained then next season will see a very transparent decision making process and happer clubs. With regard to how decisions are made, the committee has no option but to wait for reports before making decisions.
ldmc are a joke pike got no medals last week as they sum how went missing from the offices they were especially made for a once off thing from the mullally family this has to be sorted
Premier League results -
Thurs 18th May:
Carew Pk P-P Janesboro
Mungret Reg 0-3 Pike Rvs
Park AFC P-P Hill Celtic
Regional P-P Ballynanty
Remaining Fixture that will definately be played:
Park AFC vs Hill Celtic.
A Hill Celtic win will mean:
Hill Celtic vs Granville
Park AFC vs Charleville
Pos Club-----Pld W D L F A Pts
CPike Rovers21 17 1 3 31 9 52
2Carew Pk 19 11 7 1 45 13 40
3Janesboro20 12 4 4 38 23 40
4Ballynanty19 10 2 7 34 26 32
5.Regional U 19 8 6 5 33 27 30
6.Fairview R 19 9 3 7 32 27 30
7....Granville 21 6 6 9 31 37 24
8.UL/Aisling 21 7 2 12 33 39 23
9..Park AFC 19 6 3 10 20 34 21
10Charleville21 5 5 11 23 35 20
11.Hill Celtic 20 2 9 9 20 33 15
RELMungret 21 1 4 16 22 60 7
Old keeper
22/05/2006, 7:21 PM
ldmc are a joke pike got no medals last week as they sum how went missing from the offices they were especially made for a once off thing from the mullally family this has to be sorted
Well Hopefully you will be at the AGM to express your views, I agree the fact that Pike did not get their medals was poor but there is no point in complaining all the time if you dont try to change things. Come to the AGM and get active in having your club vote the way YOU want them to vote.
Old keeper
22/05/2006, 7:41 PM
Just a note to say that there are 115 teams competing in the LDMC divisions and the vast majority have a pretty uneventful season dealing with the LDMC there are always going to be problems with some decisions. Over the years it has been a situation where some one knows something because they heard it from someone else but can't say who! this is an impossible position to be in for any committee as the laws of natural justice must prevail and with clubs being very quick to appeal and go legal all decisions must be made by the rules that currently apply. However I can guarentee you that if there is any proof of wrongdoing submitted to the LDMC the pertaining matter will be dealt with.
It might be an idea if the processes and proceedures of the LDMC were made more available to clubs and then everyone would understand the constraints (we will try that next season) In the meantime if you have any evidence of wrongdoing, mail it to the website or myself by message here and it will be dealt with.
the only 1
22/05/2006, 9:04 PM
i would agree with you there Dirk, whats happening there next year with the departure of Pa Mul. Some new players needed with nabs not performing and ronan hanrahan going to aisling. Will it be a case of Dec Casey and Kev Fitzgerald and will this mean Ian Bennis will be keeping goal?
barry ryan is taking over pike
the only 1
22/05/2006, 9:08 PM
Just a note to say that there are 115 teams competing in the LDMC divisions and the vast majority have a pretty uneventful season dealing with the LDMC there are always going to be problems with some decisions. Over the years it has been a situation where some one knows something because they heard it from someone else but can't say who! this is an impossible position to be in for any committee as the laws of natural justice must prevail and with clubs being very quick to appeal and go legal all decisions must be made by the rules that currently apply. However I can guarentee you that if there is any proof of wrongdoing submitted to the LDMC the pertaining matter will be dealt with.
It might be an idea if the processes and proceedures of the LDMC were made more available to clubs and then everyone would understand the constraints (we will try that next season) In the meantime if you have any evidence of wrongdoing, mail it to the website or myself by message here and it will be dealt with.
at the end of the day they were robbed from the ldmc by a commitee member even so ye replaced them its not the point ye had no respect
Old keeper
22/05/2006, 11:32 PM
at the end of the day they were robbed from the ldmc by a commitee member even so ye replaced them its not the point ye had no respect
While I would be the first to defend anyones right to express an opinion, you dont seem to have read the last thread, If you did you would have understood that the comment you made is totally useless and unless you are willing to back it up you may as well not print it. the easy thing to do is to fire accusations on a committee, in your own words you state "they were robbed by a committee member" were you there? or is this another I was told by someone who heard it from someone else, but I cant say who?
but lets take a leap into your world for a moment and assume that you are correct, do you then tar the entire 16 members of the committee with the same brush? I think not, and I would strongly advise that you seek out the source of your information and direct them to me and I will follow it to the end. No doubt it will be from someone in the know or on the committee, and if it is then they are poorer for it. So the only 1 wheres the beef?
the only 1
23/05/2006, 12:10 AM
While I would be the first to defend anyones right to express an opinion, you dont seem to have read the last thread, If you did you would have understood that the comment you made is totally useless and unless you are willing to back it up you may as well not print it. the easy thing to do is to fire accusations on a committee, in your own words you state "they were robbed by a committee member" were you there? or is this another I was told by someone who heard it from someone else, but I cant say who?
but lets take a leap into your world for a moment and assume that you are correct, do you then tar the entire 16 members of the committee with the same brush? I think not, and I would strongly advise that you seek out the source of your information and direct them to me and I will follow it to the end. No doubt it will be from someone in the know or on the committee, and if it is then they are poorer for it. So the only 1 wheres the beef?
ask any1 in the pike commitee or pat mullally if you dont believe me with out saying names the person who told pike go futher with this was the man who gave pike the cup out in mungret thursday nite its up 2u now but this wont be the end of the matter heads will roll
lim abroad
23/05/2006, 4:11 AM
ask any1 in the pike commitee or pat mullally if you dont believe me with out saying names the person who told pike go futher with this was the man who gave pike the cup out in mungret thursday nite its up 2u now but this wont be the end of the matter heads will roll
what is somebody gonna do with all those medals,surely they're not worth that much?
backodanet
23/05/2006, 8:10 AM
ask any1 in the pike commitee or pat mullally if you dont believe me with out saying names the person who told pike go futher with this was the man who gave pike the cup out in mungret thursday nite its up 2u now but this wont be the end of the matter heads will roll
i don't think your listening to Old Keeper, he is admitting there are problems and is asking for help.
the only way people can help is by going to the committee and naming names or sending an email to him or expressing your views at the AGM.
in fairness the website is pretty good and any complaints made here have tried to be addressed so just bitching here is just what the LDMC has been about for years so give them a chance help to try and improve you are obviously interested or just bored at work :D
Old keeper
23/05/2006, 8:16 AM
what is somebody gonna do with all those medals,surely they're not worth that much?
They are priceless in the sense that they were donated by a family as a special issue for the first team to win the Cup, but not really of any use to anybody other than the winners. Replacements are in place but as for the location of the originals, there could be any number of explanations, including the one that was put forward by “the only1” but not being a follower of the conspiracy theory I would prefer to await the final outcome and deal in facts. It would appear that there is as much sport to be had in junior soccer by what’s happening off the field as what’s happening on it.
Happy Zapper
23/05/2006, 11:30 AM
at the end of the day they were robbed from the ldmc by a commitee member even so ye replaced them its not the point ye had no respect
why would someone on the commitee steal medals? thats a serious accusation to make.
Dirk Diggler
23/05/2006, 2:20 PM
They are priceless in the sense that they were donated by a family as a special issue for the first team to win the Cup, but not really of any use to anybody other than the winners. Replacements are in place but as for the location of the originals, there could be any number of explanations, including the one that was put forward by “the only1” but not being a follower of the conspiracy theory I would prefer to await the final outcome and deal in facts. It would appear that there is as much sport to be had in junior soccer by what’s happening off the field as what’s happening on it.
are the new medals replicas of the stolen ones or the same medals as every year
silvercircle
23/05/2006, 2:38 PM
are the new medals replicas of the stolen ones or the same medals as every year
Please forgive my ignorance...but are people trying to tell me that the medals were "stolen" by a member of LDMC because Pike won the prem, if Balla or the view or anybody else won it they wouldnt have dissappeared....surely this is a wind up
Nemesis
23/05/2006, 4:03 PM
Please forgive my ignorance...but are people trying to tell me that the medals were "stolen" by a member of LDMC because Pike won the prem, if Balla or the view or anybody else won it they wouldnt have dissappeared....surely this is a wind up
thats the way I am reading it also - i cannot believe this to be true - whatever gripe we may have with the ldmc I am disgusted with what they are being accused of. I am ignorant of events but surely there is a valid explanation as to where the medals have gone.
Old keeper
23/05/2006, 9:53 PM
thats the way I am reading it also - i cannot believe this to be true - whatever gripe we may have with the ldmc I am disgusted with what they are being accused of. I am ignorant of events but surely there is a valid explanation as to where the medals have gone.
There will be a valid explanation, It is silly to assume that because Medals were mislaid that they were stolen, so lets all stop pouring petrol on this, I am afraid its time to come back to earth on this one.
the only 1
23/05/2006, 10:18 PM
There will be a valid explanation, It is silly to assume that because Medals were mislaid that they were stolen, so lets all stop pouring petrol on this, I am afraid its time to come back to earth on this one.
the are missing for the last couple of months and pike were told not 2worry the will be found they were told thursday night the were not and they will be replaced and have them friday for there awards night. they were not the ordinary medals people get every year the family got them made at a cost for a once off memory and ldmc are being sued end of story this is fact enough said
Old keeper
23/05/2006, 10:57 PM
the are missing for the last couple of months and pike were told not 2worry the will be found they were told thursday night the were not and they will be replaced and have them friday for there awards night. they were not the ordinary medals people get every year the family got them made at a cost for a once off memory and ldmc are being sued end of story this is fact enough said
This is the last post I will make in relation to this, you are correct in stating the medals are missing due to being mislaid, Not stolen, you are also correct in stating that they will be replaced and if the LDMC are sued, which by the way is not a fact then the clubs will be made aware of it.
Now lets move on and try to be constructive about things
lim abroad
23/05/2006, 11:25 PM
these are the most ridiculous accusations i've ever read on foot.ie,as for being sued over medals?you must be having a laugh!
the only 1
24/05/2006, 1:09 AM
This is the last post I will make in relation to this, you are correct in stating the medals are missing due to being mislaid, Not stolen, you are also correct in stating that they will be replaced and if the LDMC are sued, which by the way is not a fact then the clubs will be made aware of it.
Now lets move on and try to be constructive about things
just taking d **** bout being sued but be serious how can they go missing?end of story mr cusack even would not misplace them or wud he?
Roadend
24/05/2006, 8:38 AM
Medals being mislaid? I'm not jumping on the whole stolen idea but the "mislaid" explaination is absolutely unacceptable. Were they up in Jackman or did a committee member hold onto them? Have they had a look around the massive Jackman upstairs to see if somebody left them in the biscuit tin?
the only 1
24/05/2006, 4:19 PM
my uncle is involved with pike council member came to their meeting last night with medals for them but they were cheap ones not the ones the mullaly family got made ldmc said sorry but they dont know how they got lost from the offices mullally family goin spare and rightly so they are getting the police involved ps another twist pike chairman when got the medals off family earlier in the season wanted to hold onto them for safe keeping and the ldmc refused old keeper nows more than hes letting on:mad:
the 12 th man
24/05/2006, 4:33 PM
Lads ,keep this story about the "missing medals" from getting personal.The fact that they're missing is bad enough without an argument starting here about it.
All posts relating to this will end up binned if it turns nasty.
Bonovox
24/05/2006, 9:49 PM
04/05/2006, 8:10 AM
the only 1
Youth Team Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by the only 1
fixtures just out il bet what u want the carew v fairview match will be called off tuesday just shows cusack is out 2screw pike again dis year watch+see
as i said carew match off what a fix ldmc should just cancel thr league and hand carew the trophy and im i granville supporter the league is a joke
Its obvious from all your posts over all the threads that you are a Pike player/supporter/committee member. Stop trying to hide behind the name of another club. I realise some of you aren't the brightest lights up there but you should really think hard about what you are saying before you post on behalf of Pokey Rovers. "It's very easy to remember the truth......always difficult to explain the lies".......night, night.
the only 1
24/05/2006, 10:20 PM
04/05/2006, 8:10 AM
the only 1
Youth Team Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by the only 1
fixtures just out il bet what u want the carew v fairview match will be called off tuesday just shows cusack is out 2screw pike again dis year watch+see
as i said carew match off what a fix ldmc should just cancel thr league and hand carew the trophy and im i granville supporter the league is a joke
Its obvious from all your posts over all the threads that you are a Pike player/supporter/committee member. Stop trying to hide behind the name of another club. I realise some of you aren't the brightest lights up there but you should really think hard about what you are saying before you post on behalf of Pokey Rovers. "It's very easy to remember the truth......always difficult to explain the lies".......night, night.
believe what u want im involved with granville
backodanet
25/05/2006, 10:52 AM
Question
With Glenbrook and Bateman more than likely unplayable tonight
Do Balla and Granville lose home advantage straight away??
maestro
25/05/2006, 4:02 PM
granvilles pitch is uplayable and has already been transfered to the fairgreen! Dont know if balla will follow suit as they may be too bitter and insist on playing the game on that potatoe field they call their home ground
the only 1
25/05/2006, 4:29 PM
granvilles pitch is uplayable and has already been transfered to the fairgreen! Dont know if balla will follow suit as they may be too bitter and insist on playing the game on that potatoe field they call their home ground
heard pike are missing loads 2nite
gaidin
25/05/2006, 5:40 PM
granvilles pitch is uplayable and has already been transfered to the fairgreen! Dont know if balla will follow suit as they may be too bitter and insist on playing the game on that potatoe field they call their home ground
Actually the Balla and Pike match has also been changed.
HuRya
25/05/2006, 11:47 PM
Premier League fixtures -
Sun 28th May:
Carew Pk vs Janesboro
Park AFC vs Hill Celtic
UL/Aisling vs Mungret
Pos Club-----Pld W D L F A Pts
CPike Rovers21 17 1 3 31 9 52
2Carew Pk 19 11 7 1 45 13 40
3Janesboro20 12 4 4 38 23 40
4Ballynanty19 10 2 7 34 26 32
5.Regional U 19 8 6 5 33 27 30
6.Fairview R 19 9 3 7 32 27 30
7....Granville 21 6 6 9 31 37 24
8.UL/Aisling 21 7 2 12 33 39 23
9..Park AFC 19 6 3 10 20 34 21
10Charleville21 5 5 11 23 35 20
11.Hill Celtic 20 2 9 9 20 33 15
RELMungret 21 1 4 16 22 60 7
guvnor
25/05/2006, 11:56 PM
Premier League fixtures -
Sun 28th May:
Carew Pk vs Janesboro
Park AFC vs Hill Celtic
UL/Aisling vs Mungret
Pos Club-----Pld W D L F A Pts
CPike Rovers21 17 1 3 31 9 52
2Carew Pk 19 11 7 1 45 13 40
3Janesboro20 12 4 4 38 23 40
4Ballynanty19 10 2 7 34 26 32
5.Regional U 19 8 6 5 33 27 30
6.Fairview R 19 9 3 7 32 27 30
7....Granville 21 6 6 9 31 37 24
8.UL/Aisling 21 7 2 12 33 39 23
9..Park AFC 19 6 3 10 20 34 21
10Charleville21 5 5 11 23 35 20
11.Hill Celtic 20 2 9 9 20 33 15
RELMungret 21 1 4 16 22 60 7
Should be an interesting tussle between Park and Hill celtic...
abbeyvale
26/05/2006, 12:19 AM
Should be an interesting tussle between Park and Hill celtic...
go on the Celts and get thos Cork boys out of the Prem
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.