Not a bad club for Noe to be heading to for now but I worry abit about Fulham despite their good form this season. The EPL is likely to introduce Financial fair Play / financial break-even type rules soon. Fulham are one of the only clubs resisting, because they know that having to break-even financially would hit their performance hard and maybe even relegate them.
His Wiki page is in danger of being deleted.
No Somos muchos pero estamos locos.
Besides the debate on his relative eligibility, this thread is rubbish!
Seriously.
he didnt get a game for fulham under 18s testerday against the pool. One of the other centre halves that played is irish o Reilly. O halloren came on as a sub for fulham under 17 player for us wide man but played up top yesterday.
Dan cleary was sub for pool who is a right full or centre half but very tidy footballer and no sign of o hanlon. I know o hanlon has had a lot of expectation but when u look at the players he is up against to play wide for the pool under 18s you have Ibe who is maybe 6 months older played for wycombe first team as a 15 year old and cost pool at least 1million and ojo who is a year younger and cost 2 million from mk dons both of whom are physically miles ahead of o hanlon and are beasts of men for their age.
English academies spend so much money on buying players the pool had at least 5 players yesterday in there under 18s that they bought in from other clubs prob costing 3 or 4 million in total. Even fulham had 2 or 3 european players in there under 18s and a striker they bought from mk dons who was youngest player to score in fa cup when he played for the dons first team last year! Life is not easy in premier league academies
Thanks for that liamoo11. I was looking for information on O'Hanlon and Cleary to see how they've been doing and came across the article below. As you say, the competition at top clubs is immense. Cleary seems to be doing well which is good to hear. I know there was a huge amount of talk of O'Hanlon and Jack Byrne of Man City which was apparently very justified from what I've heard of them talent wise, but it is a major burden for lads of that age to be spoken of so highly. In fairness, O'Hanlon would still be a u16 or u17 player, so maybe we shouldn't be too disappointed he isn't a regular for the Liverpool u18s.
http://www.thisisanfield.com/2012/10...der-18s-squad/
He not moving over till January!
I was going to say that. It's a bit harsh to be criticising him for not breaking into the U18s when he's not even eligible for two more months.
He has produced some interesting artwork.
http://www.noebaba.com/works.html
Bookmarks