I'd say the FAI put it to good use rather than letting it sit in their account.
There's an argument that the IFA be the sole controlling body overseeing senior league football in Ireland
Emmet Malone reported today
'After their Europa League run in 2011, Shamrock Rovers were left waiting on around €500,000 for more than six months and are believed to have experienced significant difficulty in obtaining payment.'
'This (delay) is a particular issue for the various other clubs that compete in the qualifying stages each summer. Prize money has grown hugely over the last decade and having won the league, and so initially qualified for the preliminary rounds of the Champions League last summer then having gone into the Europa League, Cork City would have been due around €800,000 - but charter flights and other expenses have to be met up front.'
'One club claims that while Irish League sides receive money up front from the association north of the border to help with participation, funds that are then deducted when the prize money comes through, League of Ireland outfits have to come up with the cash, often through borrowings, and are then made to wait extended periods to get it back.'
Have all the cards been laid out bare on the table by the Oireacthas Committee, so that now the FAI can carefully prepare their answers to the known/expected questions?
Before the proceedings, the Oireacthas Committee agreed to carry on regardless of the FAI's response to the 100k question. As soon as the committee questioned the sports council, it was clear that the FAI fudged the issue yet again. In a grandstanding fit, Noel Rock demanded the proceedings should stop until the FAI were in the (virtual) dock. The chairperson intervened and reminded him of the pre committee agreement to carry on regardless of the FAI's response.
Malachy Clerkin described Rock as "the closest anyone came to performative high dudgeon all day". That's a nice descriptive turn of phrase.
Latest from the FAI,- some board members did not know they were actually board members, others deny being board members.
As opposed to offering basic ethical transparency, the FAI board's obsessive concern about optics reaches newer heights, with the release of a 21 page somewhat vacant yet suspicious opening statement for the Oireacthas Committee. Some shape shifting in response to last week's mayhem, they now have adopted a mea culpa approach towards Sports Ireland without adding any clarification. WE are sorry, we didn't mean to hurt your feelings, but we are still saying nothing, except contrary to earlier statements, some of us didn't know anything.
Last edited by geysir; 08/04/2019 at 9:50 PM.
Firstly it took me some time to find the actual statement issued by the FAI this afternoon. Is there an easy place to find these things? The FAI website is a quagmire to me.
Secondly the 22 page statement (as per one news source) is by all accounts a double edged sword. If board members were not 'fully aware' or did not know about the loan, and yes in many organisations in Ireland this is true, communication are fuddled and dire, then how could the same members without all the knowledge approve Delaney for his new position?
On the backswing of the blade is the blow that this also leaves the FAI room to say they can't fully answer questions to the Oireachtas Committee because they have not met with the correct people to consult on that particular issue.
Commitee meets with FAI at 0900 tomorrow, link to the Oireachtas live-stream here: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/oireachtas-tv/cr4-live/
Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).
its infuriating that the FAI have cut staff wages, let development officers go, cant supply basic kit to some of our teams, award pathetic prize money to the LOI yet can afford some of the biggest salaries going around football administration and commission madly expensive consultants reports at will. its all so self-serving
It will be so interesting to see how the FAI will get out of this Scot free, they as always will find a way.
That's dissapointing. The Oireachtas schedule didn't say private or public, just assumed it was public. Strangely Sporting Ireland were grilled in public last week.
Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).
It was not a loan!!
The board were not fully aware of the "transaction" at the time in 2017, but it was public knowledge by the time there was a board meeting which allegedly met and approved of Delaney's new position. That followed on from the recommendations of some alleged secret review, where it is alleged that the review (with magnificent foresight) managed to come up with an appropriate exit strategy for JD. It is just one of those coincidences in life that the fabled review's exit strategy has all the appearances of being made up on the spot by Delaney some 5 minutes before the board meeting, in the aftermath context of the failed court case etc.etcand yes in many organisations in Ireland this is true, communication are fuddled and dire, then how could the same members without all the knowledge approve Delaney for his new position?
On the backswing of the blade is the blow that this also leaves the FAI room to say they can't fully answer questions to the Oireachtas Committee because they have not met with the correct people to consult on that particular issue
The review that came up with the new role for JD has been provided to the Oireachtas. There's some more on that here: https://www.independent.ie/sport/soc...-37995853.html
Tallaght Stadium Regular
sport Ireland to suspend funding to the FAI...
https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2019...sport-ireland/
The Oireachtas Committee were hammering on that point a lot in the meeting with Sporting Ireland last week, their reps expressed great reluctance to go that far. That they have today shows how badly this is going for the FAI.
The review was made public April 8th, and it just reads as pre-packaged to suit a changing narrative. Would it be out of the question that the internal consultation and feedback on this key recommendation took place a day or days before March 23rd? He who pays the piper calls the tune
"Following extensive internal consultation and feedback, the Report’s key recommendation is that the FAI Board consider creating a new role of Executive Vice-President and start the process of recruiting a new Chief Executive in order to put itself in the best position possible for the strategic period ahead," it read.
Regardless of the premature haste to push out the packaged solution which perfectly fitted Delaney, the entire purpose of calling this review smells.
If anybody questions the merit of the new role for Delaney, he can claim it was not me who said it, 'twas from this independent review by first class sports expert JH associates who said it and they are the authority in these organisational matters.
This report comes from a hired sports consultant, most probably given a narrow brief to come up with a plausible context for Delaney to be in the FAI and retain the Uefa position
The wording of the report is fawning, would anybody be surprised if Delaney prepared the script?
The FAI's "enviable position" of having Mr Delaney on the board
the FAI should consider its approach in 2021 in the "hopefully unlikely event" that Mr Delaney is not re-elected to the Uefa executive committee.
Whats that about? should Delaney get the chop from Uefa, he should be restored to former position?
And all this delusional cr*p about world cup bids.
RTE says the first hour is private, and the committee will meet in public from 1000. The first hour is generally for discussion/adoption of minutes and procedural issues (says the Oireachtas website)
Link again: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/oireachtas-tv/cr4-live/
Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).
Bookmarks