well if you think spending money on the sale of a stadium when you have no replacement is NOT overspending, your as deluded as you always where,Originally Posted by higgins
surely with all the rubbish and blatant lies coming from Higgins back in the good auld days for $hel$ your not actually taking him serious
well if you think spending money on the sale of a stadium when you have no replacement is NOT overspending, your as deluded as you always where,
Going around in circles now!!
I've never said what Shels done in the past was correct.
I'd been dead against the sort of spending going on at Shels long before anyone from here raised the issue. I just didn't post on foot the minute I came to this conclusion. Unlike some others on here the world doesn't revolve around foot.ie for me.
The point now is that Stu has decided to get invloved in something. I know he has spread lies in the past and just a couple of posts above he has decided to put something in quotation marks ?? I'd like to know where he got that from ?
Stu is yet to retract his lies about Shels continuing to overspend.
Stu is a spoofer... Always was and looks like he's not about to change. I know this because he's put up posts about Shels in the past that I know are 100% false.
John Delaney!! GET OUT!!!
www.ssdg.ie
You just downplayed it, ignored it, denied there was a real problem, said everyone was just jealous and basically put your fingers in your ears and hummed along.
For anyone who missed it first time, here are the relevant claims. The disagreement seems to be based around Stu saying "overspending from the sale of the ground.". The chairman of Shels has said that they're still spending money from the ground. Stu calls this "overspending", others disagree.
http://foot.ie/showpost.php?p=950328&postcount=130
Do you get off on this telling lies about Shelbourne ?Originally Posted by pineapple stu
Yep, let's have a team who are continuing to overspend from the sale of their ground (and who would have to spend even more if they go up) and who are still a disaster in the making two years after they should have learnt; that'll do good.
Did you have the box of hankies beside you as you typed that ???
'continue to overspend from the sale of the ground'
We sold the ground (very stupid idea), we spent most of the money we are likely to receive from that deal (very stupid idea), BUT we're not spending any more of that money!
In fact on top of this years running costs at the club which will be funded entirely from this seasons income we have also managed to service some of the debts from before the 2007 season. If anything, our overall debt is reducing!!
100% of this years income is not going into running the club, it's a mixture of running the club and servicing old debt.
How can you say that's overspending ?
Incidentally, if I'm mistaken (which is a damn site different to lying, which is in theory libellous), do feel free to use facts to point out where and why. However, given my previous history of being correct with regards to Shels, I'm happy to go with my gut instinct, backed up in part by what was in a national newspaper. (And I notice Fintan Cassidy hasn't been back to the thread where he denied Shels were still drawing down on the sale, despite what the club had said).
BS - do you really think anyone else cares about the spat?Although I'd ask higgins how he reconciles this -
- with the club telling the Indo that they are, in fact, still spending that money?
No man - that doesn't rhyme. It has to rhyme, man!
"Right so Stu, I'm gonna kill you" - that would have been cool.
What's that? You want me to take you by the hand? Well, I don't see why n...
What was this thread about again?
Higgins. It's always about Higgins.
You can't spell failure without FAI
We're in for millions to the developers.
We own millions more to a bunch of creditors that are waiting on their money (some not willing to wait much longer it seems)..
However I totally disagree with the over spending comment.
I know it not to be true.
Do we have massive massive debts ?
Yes..
Not sure how many more ways I can put this but Shels debts at the end of the 2008 season are on course to be about the exact same as they were at the end of the 2007 season.
Stu can take what he wants from that ..
You want me to use facts to point out where and why you are wrong ?
We've had this out before... You are the one making the statements, balls in your court to prove this. I know what you said at the time to have been false. You had no grounds for saying that Shels were continuing to overspend, it was based on an assumption you had.
We owe a lot of money and are in trouble , yes, but we are not over spending.
If you take what came in this season with what went out we will be just about evens in my opinion come end of season.
Stu, I've told you before that you always leave out/don't know a vital piece of the jigsaw when you come up with these statements/conclusions/assumptions.
The only way you've a history of being correct about Shels is because the people with the information have not taken you to task on foot.ie!! Get a grip, there's a world outside this board Stu!! ... You've been wrong on many occasions with the latest being the over spending remark. Your answer back is to prove you wrong ? Almost impossible really considering I'm not going to post figures on an internet forum.
If I said your best friend slept with a goat last night and you know I'm lying is it up to you to prove he didn't ?
John Delaney!! GET OUT!!!
www.ssdg.ie
There's no need to drag Mullet Stu into this. He maintains that it was a misunderstanding.
I've explained this before. That goat was just resting in my bed.
Feel free to start a new thread if it'll stay on topic.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks