Very good Ref, nice to see the site finally out there.
EDIT: Ah, I didn't notice that you asked for comments, I was going to PM you. Sorry for not responding the last time you asked. Anyway, I think I mentioned to you before that my main concern about the site was the fact that the regular text and link colours are the same in the content section, and of course the links have no underline. I find this very frustrating as you have to actively look for the links and to be honest I think many people just won't bother. It's a bit of a no-no on the usability front.
That's the major thing and I really think you should address that. There are a few other small things too, though they're not nearly as important:
- The logos at the top are very noisy, as if they were resized at 256 colours. I realise that it's difficult finding originals of good quality but if you do actually have some, feel free to send them on and I'll see if I can get rid of some of that noise.
- The tabs are a bit small from the usability POV. They're legible at 1280x1024 but I wouldn't like to have bad sight looking at them and I wouldn't like to view the site at a higher res. This applies to the fonts site-wide too, unfortunately. Personally, I wouldn't go below 10pt on any site these days except for context information and special circumstances.
- I'd put a line break before and after the navigation in the footer and make it a more prominent colour, but that's more of a personal thing.
As I've said in the past, I'm not being critical, I hope this is taken as constructive criticism. Well done.
adam
Bookmarks