I would add that I also believe that there's a very high level of basic incompetence involved. The actions of the administration, their offices, and senators and representatives post-911 prove that definitively. The security theatre the entire developed world has been subjected to because of their incompetence alone proves that, never mind things like voting for the Patriot Act without reading it, spending trillions on undeclared "wars", etc, etc.
adam
Originally Posted by dahamsta
Yeah def agree here. A lot of the conspiracies are bizarre and only a fool would go on about them. The real conspiracy is that the hawks etc knew damn well whay was happening, ala pearl harbour
that programme was rubbish. they should have devoted it all to Steve Austin who is a legend of a man
if you want to see how a government can conspire against its own people then check out Dispatches last report on Chechynia, and you will get a real sense that the Russian government were directing a lot of the terrorist attacks. it was scary stuff watching that show, sorry i havent a link
Pearl Harbour was just more incompetence and not a conspiracy.
Forget about the performance or entertainment. It's only the result that matters.
The BBC documentary about 9/11 was shown about four or five times this week in the late night slot. It covered the views of 'Loose Change', the official account and independent analysts.
You can never be sure with this sort of thing but really I think Loose Change have an axe to grind against the US government (as so many do over there) and are just looking for reasons to have a go at it. Their theory sounds plausible until your hear the rebuttal to it, which sounds more plausible, and the independent analysts backed it up. That, and I don't think any administration would actually devise such a large-scale plot to damage its own country. Maybe one or two indivduals at a high level might get involved with a plot but the kind of thing Loose Change were suggesting would have taken so many people that someone would almost certainly have grassed on the conspirators.
"Life is like a hair on a toilet seat. Sooner or later you are bound to get pi$$ed off."
"In this league, a draw is sometimes as good as a win" - Steve Morison
Have you seen the rebutal to the BBC one ?it goes on and on the problem with them is one is put foward with convincing arguments they can spout off facts that normal people wouldnt know it they are true or not.
Why do people think the goverment could be behind it ? because thats how they think.
http://conspiraciesthatweretrue.blog...cies-from.html
1962 Operation Northwoods
Operation Northwoods or Northwoods was the code name for various proposals for false flag actions, including domestic terror attacks on U.S. soil, proposed in 1962 by senior U.S. Department of Defense leaders to generate U.S. public support for military action against Cuba. The proposal was presented in a document entitled "Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba," a draft memorandum pdf) written by the Department of Defense (DoD) and Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) representative to the Caribbean Survey Group. The draft memo was presented by the JCS to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13 with one paragraph approved, as a preliminary submission for planning purposes. However, McNamara rejected the proposal. The draft memorandum was declassified in recent years through a Freedom of Information Act request by the National Security Archive.
Sound familar it would only take a hand full of people in the know to pull it off and when they are all creaming millions off the war effort why would you open your mouth???
Last edited by anto1208; 10/07/2008 at 3:06 PM.
not really, they didnt make any mistakes, a lot of them knew exactly what they were doing
as i was saying with ref to russia and chenynia. Sleeper terrorist cells always have a chain of command. When you infilitrate this command you can get the terrorists to follow orders of any kind, play them around a bit.
this was what you got from watching the Dispatches programme. Now if the Russians can do it, sure why not the FBI/CIA?
You dont need all that garbage about phantom planes etc, all the FBI/FBI/american gov needed were willing terrorists to follow a few orders in the chain of command and then watch it all pan out
Action and result - 911 brought us Homeland security etc, and the bombing of Afganistan and Iraq (aka pumping billions of oil out everyday while everybody else is watching the war!)
There's the key sentence though. Do you know how many hair-brained schemes the US defence department have come up with throughout the years? I've read plans from presenting Castro with exploding cuban cigars, to putting the pro-Capitalist Vietnamese on boats, nuking Vietnam and then sinking the boats, thus 'sorting' the Vietnam problem once and for all. There's a big difference between ideas being proposed, to them actually being approved.
I have no doubt that the hawks took advantage of 9/11 for their own financial gain, but again there's a big difference between taking advantage of a situation and being the founder of the situation, and so far there is no concrete evidence that any of the Bush adminstration or his ilk had anything to do with the terror attacks that day
If anyone wants to read a good book about the hare brained schemes the US military comes up with, The Men Who Stare At Goats is a good one.
The title references a team of psy-ops commandos being trained in the US desert, trying to kill goats by staring at them. A minor increase in heart rate was all they achieved and even then, your heart rate would go up if someone was staring at you, wouldn't it?
Your Chairperson,
Gavin
Membership Advisory Board
"Ex Bardus , Vicis"
Good post and definetly a real possibility.Certainly more realistic than many of the hairbrain 9/11 conspiracies which seem only to stop any doubts of the official version.Perhaps that is the function of the far out theorys.
Last edited by seanfhear; 12/07/2008 at 9:15 AM.
wow thanks for reminding me about that. I havent read that book but C4 i think did a documentary about it a while back and it was really weird, and to think that these guys had huge financial backing from the government
Couple of facts that I like about 911.
3.2 Trillion announced missing from the Pentagon budgets on Sep 10th and
the side that was hit was housing the investigation offices.
Some of the hijackers turning up on various Tv stations in the middle east saying it wasnt me boss im here.
The hijackers passports turning up in the rubble( ye give me a break)
Larry Silversteins "I told them to pull it" reference to WTC7 collapse on CBS
Champions 2010
Champions 2011
Dick Brush 1 Sligo 0
Bohs are going bust.
Also, a one armed man was seen leaving the vicinity shortly before the bombs went off.
Did you also gasp when the papers showed the face of Satan appearing in the smoke looming over Manhatten that day?
This is quite a good read...The aurthor, John Ronson, has also written another one called "Them" and it includes a lot on the whole Bilderberg/NeoCon new world order conspiracy guff so its essential reading for all of you conspiracy loons!!!
You show me a good loser and I'll show you a loser - Vince Lombardi
If only we could catch this man he is very elusive.
That young lad who made loose change came across as someone who has a lot of growing up to do.Very annoying.
The most credible of the conspiracy theories IMO concerns the killing of RFK where new evidence seem to suggest it(the official line) is at least worth reviewing.
Quite incredible that Bin Laden was never brought to justice today "smaller World" while over 3000(?) young Americans died in a completely unneccesary War.
I only mention Americans, because if Bush had said in the aftermath of 9\11
-I will double the number of Americans dead and not catch the guy who planned this, he would have been telling the truth.
I know this is stating the obvious, but it is just bewildering how right wing media can convince people otherwise.
Still, a lot of his mates got juicy contracts so thats the important thing.
This is the best book on the Neocons (or the New Dumb as Dr.Thompson referred to them) I've read so far. Absolutely love the title too, but any book that cuts into Bill O'Reilly gets two thumbs up from me
I didnt say that I thought there was a connspiracy, Just that there is some good ammo for conspiracy theorists
Champions 2010
Champions 2011
Dick Brush 1 Sligo 0
Bohs are going bust.
Charlie Brooker personally taking issue with Foot.ie posters in the Guardian today?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...eptember11.usa
Thats the err official Hell photo released I presume :>
j'accuse!
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks