Good post.
If a given company is listed the market usually adversely reacts to news like this - share prices drop. Similarly in the marketplace, there might be a drop off in sales for a while. But it's all very short-term: investors and consumers wake up to morality and throw a little tantrum, for a while. But when the dust settles, the sweat still drips, and wallets still squeal for attention and nourishment. If the profits keep coming and prices are low consumers and investors look after number one. And can you really blame them?
For any meaningful improvement, pressure needs to be exerted closer to the scene of the crime. But as you touch upon, the victims in this case are forced into consenting to the practices owing to wider contexts; and authorities are slow to chastise the companies as the latter wield more power. And anyway where local mobilisation is nascent or absent, and authorities are corrupt/lazy/inept then companies will always screw the weak in some way. Maybe not as bad as child labour but in whatever way they can get away with in order to sate the market's and management's demands.
My ideal solution would be to give greater weight to 'soft' matters such as these in the markets through full transparency - i.e. independent reporting - so that companies are truly encouraged to be fair on employees. I agree there isn't much point us over here throwing a fit: it should be up to the host country to look after its own. But in the seeming absence of such maybe the concerned don't have much else to do but make themselves feel better about the situation?
Bookmarks