You're trying to portray this as a case of 'take the money and run'. If this hypothetical club in the Republic was pushed out of the League of Ireland on unreasonable and sectarian grounds, I think you'd find there'd be considerable sympathy for them...
1) Please explain why City's unique footballing position should not also be reflected by a unique funding situatioon - where each side pays less than it otherwise would if the club was 100% involved in their jurisdiction, but the sum-total is the same ? Surely each side of the border benefits from this ?
2) If you're so concerend to see a nlevel playing field in Irish football, can you confirm your support for DCFc to be exempt form the VAT charges that are levied upon entrance fees to sporting events in the north, given that these charges aren't levied in the south and City is therefore at a 17.5% revenue disadvantage for every person it gets through its gates ?
This is the nub of your arguement - you just don't like City playing in the LOI and want Stormont to with-hold their financial toys as a result. If City wants those toys, it has to go crawling back to your tin-pot league to do so.
The reality is that City's unique situation will actually cost Nortehrn Irish football LESS ! If we were in the IL we'd be looking for ALL the money form the north. This is how blinkered you are in your poedantry - you'd actually be happier to see UK tax-payers faced with a bigger burden from Derry City FC, ratehr than have it shared north and south, just so your autistic-inability to grasp the club's unique position can be satisfied. Anyone where else in the world, tax-payers would be happy to see their burden reduced for the same benefit. Sadly, not in Ealing Green-land...
Irish football is not as clean cut as two sides of the border and two leagues operating insplendid isolation. A unique sporting situation exists, and that opens up unique funding situations. You may not like it, but them's the facts...
Bookmarks