Of course that's my point. Really straightforward, I would have thought, but it seems it's still too confusing for lamper to follow.
Expenses are irrelevant in this context. It's how much of the club's budget is being bankrolled by one person. If you've no money, you've no money, regardless of whether you're short one million or five million.
The opposite of sustainable is not bankrupt. In other words, if the investor pulls out, the club doesn't necessarily have to go belly up for it to be deemed unsustainable. Shels were unsustainable, their bankroller pulled out and yet they're still around.
And as for explaining the difference between a trust fund and a person.
Bookmarks