Quote15 million pounds.
Ridiculous.
15 million pounds.
Ridiculous.
I think I should the parachute, because I'm great.
In fact, I think I should get both parachutes, in case one doesn't work.
Why??Originally Posted by Torn-Ado
good value imo.
City definetly have the best bands playing at half-time.
O'Bama - "Eerah yeah, I'd say we can alright!"
G.O'Mahoney Trapattoni'll sort ém out!!
Wow that was nearly funny in 2003.Chelski
does this make him the most expensive player transfer wise, i think there was something in the papers that his combined transfer fees added up to 70million correct me if i'm wrong.
Last edited by gee wizz; 11/01/2008 at 9:13 PM.
Bake em away Toys
Doubt he would be , I think Veron would take that particular accolade
I'll have to do a google search on it but 15mill is small change for the blueskis,le sulk will bang goals in for fun down there,back to milan and a spot of shopping for shevchenko me thinks
Bake em away Toys
They'd be mad to get rid of Shevchenko ,Milan have their full quota of strikers at the minute tooI'll have to do a google search on it but 15mill is small change for the blueskis,le sulk will bang goals in for fun down there,back to milan and a spot of shopping for shevchenko me thinks
Nope, Its Anelka alright, saw it in the paper yesterday. He was 115m with Veron on something like 106m and Crespo 96m.
maybe so but he doesnt look a happy camper
Bake em away Toys
You are wrong
Good player. Hopefully he'll have some cop on, like he did at Bolton, and just play football. They don't call him Le Sulk for nothing. Good cover for Drogba during the ACN and hopefully he'll do enough to stay ahead of Sheva after that. He won't be ahead of Drogba for awhile yet.
Extratime.ie
Yo te quiero, mi querida. Sin tus besos, yo soy nada.
Abri o portão de ouro, da maquina do tempo.
Mi mamá me hizo guapo, listo y antimadridista.
I dont think he has been a miserable so and so for about 8 years now in fairness
Great business for Bolton by almost doubling their outlay on him but they will miss him big time.
Anelka is a proven goalscorer so good business by both clubs IMO. Don't think he's the childish prat of some years ago so if he has matured he could have a fine career at Chelsea.
Top Breeders recommend drinkfeckarse....
I remember while at Man City he complained that he'd never got a chance at a big club, despite having played for Arsenal, Real Madrid, Liverpool and PSG.
I do think his attitude has changed in recent years and I look forward to seeing him in a blue shirt. I just hope he keeps his head straight.
Extratime.ie
Yo te quiero, mi querida. Sin tus besos, yo soy nada.
Abri o portão de ouro, da maquina do tempo.
Mi mamá me hizo guapo, listo y antimadridista.
Good player and if he gets the service he'll always score goals. When you consider Carrick went for around 16/17 million it doesn't seem that much of an outlay.
"If God had meant football to be played in the air, he'd have put grass in the sky." Brian Clough.
You'll NEVER beat the Irish.......you'll just draw with us instead!!!
carrick is much better than alot of people think.....
anelka should be a good signing for chelsea, shows that they havnt much faith in kalou, shevchenko or pizarro.
Not really, all the top clubs have/need 4/5 strikers anyway. Chelsea were desperately in need of a striker considering Drogba and Kalou are away at the ANC and Shevchenko is injured. Pizarro has been inconsistent for them as well as having his own injury problems.
Top Breeders recommend drinkfeckarse....
sorry, thought for some reason that kalou played for holland, thought he would have been around for the next few weeks
Last edited by feo123; 11/01/2008 at 3:27 PM.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks