Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 102

Thread: A 'Home' Squad

  1. #41
    Banned
    Joined
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    6,822
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by backtowalsall View Post
    The feeling is entirely mutual.




    The name Britannia derived from the travel writings of the ancient Greek Pytheas around 320 BC, which described various islands in the North Atlantic as far North as Thule (probably Iceland). Although Pytheas' own writings do not survive, later Greek writers described the islands as the αι Βρεττανιαι or the Brittanic Isles. The peoples of these islands of Prettanike were called the Πρεττανοι, Priteni or Pretani. These names derived from a Celtic name which is likely to have reached Pytheas from the Gauls, who may have used it as their term for the inhabitants of the islands. Priteni is the source of the Welsh language term Prydain, Britain, which has the same source as the Goidelic term Cruithne used to refer to the early Brythonic speaking inhabitants of Ireland and the north of Scotland. The latter were later called Picts or Caledonians by the Romans.

    That is what i mean by Geography and history. This island and these islands have a history that extends beyond the English version that starts in 1066.

    Trying reading a bit. I'm sure theres a decent library in Derry.
    You should try reading Cardinal John Henry Newman on the subject. He, an Englishman by birth, didn't consider the term '' British Isles'' to be in any way accurate! I like the IONA one myself as it tip's it's hat to St. Columbkille ( aka Columba) an Irish ecclesiastical explorer and sales agent
    Last edited by CollegeTillIDie; 05/12/2007 at 7:54 AM.

  2. #42
    Capped Player
    Joined
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,925
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,880
    Thanked in
    2,796 Posts
    For what it's worth I've no problem with the term British Isles. It's not an assertion of sovereignty. To seek to replace it with a less convcenient expression smacks of chippiness in my view. There are more important aspects of our relationship with the British to fret about in my opinion.

  3. #43
    Reserves dynamo kerry's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2004
    Location
    Tralee
    Posts
    720
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    15
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    52
    Thanked in
    36 Posts
    this is a brilliant thread. I love it.

    I think the home nations team should have a new anthem to include every one. Maybe they could sing 'One' by U2. Sure isn't Bono a knight as well.

    Seriously though, We'd easily get 3 or 4 players in the team. given, finnan, Keane and Mcgeady

  4. #44
    Reserves Cymro's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    892
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    23
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    86
    Thanked in
    35 Posts
    I think Wales would have 2, maybe 3 players in the team, depending on whether Giggs would be considered eligible having retired from Welsh matches.

    I think on recent form, especially in internationals, Koumas, Bale and Bellamy would have to be considered for a place in the squad, if not the starting XI.

    This would be my team for the record:

    G-Given/Gordon-how do you choose? Impossible, imo.
    LB-Bale
    CB-Richards
    CB-Terry
    RB-Finnan I guess
    LM-Giggs, assuming he's eligible.
    CM-Ferguson
    CM-Hargreaves
    RM-Bentley-little controversial but he's been playing really well for Blackburn recently.
    CF-Healy
    CF-Crouch

    Subs: Given/Gordon, A.Hughes, Dunne, Koumas, Beckham, Rooney, Keane.

    No Lampard or Gerrard anywhere near the team. They would turn us into a kick and rush team which is the one thing I really would not want to see, especially at international level. The above players can actual keep the ball and pick out a pass, rather than shooting from 30 metres out and sticking the ball in row Z.
    "Life is like a hair on a toilet seat. Sooner or later you are bound to get pi$$ed off."

    "In this league, a draw is sometimes as good as a win" - Steve Morison

  5. #45
    Reserves danonion's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    436
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by backtowalsall View Post
    The feeling is entirely mutual.




    The name Britannia derived from the travel writings of the ancient Greek Pytheas around 320 BC, which described various islands in the North Atlantic as far North as Thule (probably Iceland). Although Pytheas' own writings do not survive, later Greek writers described the islands as the αι Βρεττανιαι or the Brittanic Isles. The peoples of these islands of Prettanike were called the Πρεττανοι, Priteni or Pretani. These names derived from a Celtic name which is likely to have reached Pytheas from the Gauls, who may have used it as their term for the inhabitants of the islands. Priteni is the source of the Welsh language term Prydain, Britain, which has the same source as the Goidelic term Cruithne used to refer to the early Brythonic speaking inhabitants of Ireland and the north of Scotland. The latter were later called Picts or Caledonians by the Romans.

    That is what i mean by Geography and history. This island and these islands have a history that extends beyond the English version that starts in 1066.

    Trying reading a bit. I'm sure theres a decent library in Derry.
    Without questioning the veracity of your facts (afaia they're all true) you are using, clever well-worded historical ideas that are really non-sequitor to your initial contention. I'm not trying to be an arse, but thats really not fair
    To consider Ireland a home-nation is to take a historical term and apply it incorrectly; the term home nation was used to denote the entities of the UK (called by the British states, what they are in modern political terms, I'm not really sure) in the North Atlantic Archipelago, and make a distinction from other states that belonged to the then British Empire all around the world.

    So for you to consider Ireland a home nation, by the term's very own definition, Ireland would need political affiliation with the UK.

    To consider Ireland British in the way iron-age/earlymedieval/etc historians considered the North Atlantic Archipelago to be British is a fairly acceptable notion in my opinion, although I personally feel that the historical baggage that British carries with it, make the term divisive and unnecessary to use when we have other alternative to describe the nations on these islands and the islands themselves.
    Last edited by danonion; 06/12/2007 at 3:44 AM.
    "No regrets, none at all. My only regret is that we went out on penalties. That's my only regret. But no, no regrets." -Mick McCarthy

  6. #46
    Seasoned Pro backstothewall's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,781
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    256
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    775
    Thanked in
    503 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by danonion View Post
    So for you to consider Ireland a home nation, by the term's very own definition, Ireland would need political affiliation with the UK.
    One arguement is that we do, (we have many in fact) but not the one i will use

    What i will say is that we don't need a political affiliation with the UK to be a home nation. If and when Scotland pulls out of the UK will they cease to be a home nation?? Its a term with whatever definition you choose to put to it, and in my opinion the home nations are Ireland, Scotland, Wales & England (in that order hopefully)

    That said, a home nations team should NEVER happen. Unless to play continental Europe for charity or something.

  7. #47
    Now with extra sauce! Dodge's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Insomnia
    Posts
    23,528
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,676
    Thanked in
    1,454 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by backtowalsall View Post
    in my opinion the home nations are Ireland, Scotland, Wales & England (in that order hopefully).
    I thought it was s political thing (as you said earlier)
    54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
    ---
    New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
    LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/

  8. #48
    International Prospect tricky_colour's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Nottingham.
    Posts
    8,886
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,682
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    898
    Thanked in
    621 Posts
    The term means whatever you want it to mean.
    In this case it refers to Ireland, N Ireland, Wales, Sotland and England.
    It's not a political term, just a convienient term to refer to local nations who
    failed to qualify.

  9. #49
    Banned
    Joined
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    6,822
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    One argument against us being considered a home nation is this. Britain has snakes and we don't ... reason? Because Britain came out of the sea while it was still physically connected to continental Europe. Our little island remained immersed until several thousand years later, hence no snakes.

  10. #50
    Banned
    Joined
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    6,822
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Cymro View Post
    I think Wales would have 2, maybe 3 players in the team, depending on whether Giggs would be considered eligible having retired from Welsh matches.

    I think on recent form, especially in internationals, Koumas, Bale and Bellamy would have to be considered for a place in the squad, if not the starting XI.

    This would be my team for the record:

    G-Given/Gordon-how do you choose? Impossible, imo.
    LB-Bale
    CB-Richards
    CB-Terry
    RB-Finnan I guess
    LM-Giggs, assuming he's eligible.
    CM-Ferguson
    CM-Hargreaves
    RM-Bentley-little controversial but he's been playing really well for Blackburn recently.
    CF-Healy
    CF-Crouch

    Subs: Given/Gordon, A.Hughes, Dunne, Koumas, Beckham, Rooney, Keane.

    No Lampard or Gerrard anywhere near the team. They would turn us into a kick and rush team which is the one thing I really would not want to see, especially at international level. The above players can actual keep the ball and pick out a pass, rather than shooting from 30 metres out and sticking the ball in row Z.

    To illustrate how poor we are there are two ROI players max in this team and none of them play ball more than 25 yards from their own goal!

  11. #51
    Coach eirebhoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    8,638
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    In fairness I don't think Cymro was actually going for the best 11 players. Dunne is clearly the better of the 2 Man City centre halves atm although Richards is potentially world class. And Healy isn't as good as Keane, Bellamy, Rooney and a few more.

  12. #52
    International Prospect tricky_colour's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Nottingham.
    Posts
    8,886
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,682
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    898
    Thanked in
    621 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CollegeTillIDie View Post
    One argument against us being considered a home nation is this. Britain has snakes and we don't ... reason? Because Britain came out of the sea while it was still physically connected to continental Europe. Our little island remained immersed until several thousand years later, hence no snakes.

    No it was St Patrick that go rid of the snakes.

  13. #53
    Seasoned Pro
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Down and out in Paris and London
    Posts
    2,904
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    14
    Thanked in
    13 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tricky_colour View Post
    ...In this case it refers to Ireland, N Ireland, Wales, Sotland and England.
    It's not a political term, just a convienient term to refer to local nations who
    failed to qualify.
    Why not add Belgium?
    Quote Originally Posted by CollegeTillIDie View Post
    ...Our little island remained immersed until several thousand years later, hence no snakes.
    Charlie Haughey?
    This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!

  14. #54
    International Prospect tricky_colour's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Nottingham.
    Posts
    8,886
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,682
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    898
    Thanked in
    621 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by lopez View Post
    Why not add Belgium?
    We have no land border with Belgium.

  15. #55
    Seasoned Pro
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Down and out in Paris and London
    Posts
    2,904
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    14
    Thanked in
    13 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tricky_colour View Post
    We have no land border with Belgium.
    Don't have a land border with Scotland, Wales or England either. Why not the Faroes or Iceland?
    This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!

  16. #56
    International Prospect tricky_colour's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Nottingham.
    Posts
    8,886
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,682
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    898
    Thanked in
    621 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by lopez View Post
    Don't have a land border with Scotland, Wales or England either. Why not the Faroes or Iceland?
    Scotland, Wales and England are part of the UK which has a land border with Ireland.

    I guess you could call the team the homeland squad or something like that.
    Faroes and Iceland don't have a land border with either the UK or Ireland
    Last edited by tricky_colour; 07/12/2007 at 5:34 PM. Reason: To amend contents of post. (unsurprisingly)

  17. #57
    Reserves Bondvillain's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    565
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tricky_colour View Post
    Faroes and Iceland don't have a land border with either the UK or Ireland
    If that's an official FAI statement, I want independent confirmation.
    On the way into the stadium, an elderly San Marino Steward waved us in and said "Tonight, may the best team win"

    And they nearly did.

  18. #58
    First Team
    Joined
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,961
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    559
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    195
    Thanked in
    114 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CollegeTillIDie View Post
    One argument against us being considered a home nation is this. Britain has snakes and we don't ... reason? Because Britain came out of the sea while it was still physically connected to continental Europe. Our little island remained immersed until several thousand years later, hence no snakes.
    That's an urban myth, we all know who got rid of the snakes FFS.

  19. #59
    First Team
    Joined
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,961
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    559
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    195
    Thanked in
    114 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dynamo kerry View Post
    Seriously though, We'd easily get 3 or 4 players in the team. given, finnan, Keane and Mcgeady
    1/2 of this forum don't want McGeady anywhere near the Irish team!

  20. #60
    Reserves danonion's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    436
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by tricky_colour View Post
    Scotland, Wales and England are part of the UK which has a land border with Ireland.

    I guess you could call the team the homeland squad or something like that.
    Faroes and Iceland don't have a land border with either the UK or Ireland
    This is very much clutching at straws. Home nation has a specific meaning. Ireland does not fit the criteria of this meaning. We are not a home nation, one cannot consider us a home nation.

    Arguing that Ireland is a home nation is congruent to arguing we are part of the UK.
    "No regrets, none at all. My only regret is that we went out on penalties. That's my only regret. But no, no regrets." -Mick McCarthy

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •