Eh no we can't let it go . Because a declining population from the 1840's to the 1960's ensured that when we did get independence we were condemned to the economic doldrums for most of the first 75 years of statehood.
Standing idly by and doing nothing when people are dying of hunger, or exporting food from the country at the same time is as bad as actively murdering them morally speaking !
I like your I idea for sure. The Italians would ensure we would be tight defensively, the Israelis would ensure we would aggressively regain possession and Kevin Doyle and Luca Toni would get the goals.![]()
And what about a manager?
Would it have to a home grown one or could it be a foreigner?
Mourinho perhaps?
I know what a high horse is, and unfortunately most people don't seem to have sufficient levels of politcal maturity to come off theirs on this one, but i never expected that to happen.
But for what its worth, a home nation is one of the 4 nations that make up the British Isles
54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
---
New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/
You must have been sleeping in late and missed the last 86 years then.
As for the term the British Isles, that's an old remnant of the Empire that the English still like to cling onto that has no basis in reality in the 21st century. It's a disputed term whose use should be avoided by any self respecting Irishman.
Last edited by youngirish; 01/12/2007 at 10:19 PM.
Well, I don't think Mourinho would recognize the legitimacy of a team where the independent ROI is merged with the UK, but I think that a manager would have to be a manager of this make-believe team from the make-believe Home Nations would have to be a manager from the last campaign of these teams. Therefore, the Scottish and Wee Countrys managers will have ditched for clubs money, so they are all out, McLaren may be too upset to take the post after "the saddest day of his life" therefore Stan's the only choice. Would he do it? You tell me.
Of course, If we're a 'home nation' , then that renders any Scots, Norironers, Welsh or Englishmen as similarly "home grown' and certainly out of the "foreigner' equasion, meaning if we were to look for a 'foreigner' manager, we of the home nations would most probably be best served having consultancies with the sporting representatives of the Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, or perhaps even the swarthy Iberian empires.
My own personal choice would be a tactitian of Prussian / Bavarian stock, in fact as I recall, Corporal Otto Von Schteck's XI certainly gave our boys one hell of a beating in the Christmas fixture of 1914. Perhaps the Home nation Sporting ministry (Association football, Department of Eire affairs) , open minded as they are, should give him a call?
On the way into the stadium, an elderly San Marino Steward waved us in and said "Tonight, may the best team win"
And they nearly did.
Havn't heard that before - just the IONA (Islands of the North Atlantic).
I prefer the term 'Celtic Isles'. Every single island and constituent part of what dinosaurs still refer to as 'The British Isles' has a Celtic presence. Conversely, neither the Republic of Ireland nor the Isle of Man are part of Britain/the UK, or British.
54,321 sold - wws will never die - ***
---
New blog if anyone's interested - http://loihistory.wordpress.com/
LOI section on balls.ie - http://balls.ie/league-of-ireland/
he's right you know, here it is in black and white:
http://www.pretanicworld.com/Neolithic.html
or marroon and a sort've mustard shade if you prefer..
so who's playin left wing, bale or duff??![]()
zombie/thread killer..
The feeling is entirely mutual.
The name Britannia derived from the travel writings of the ancient Greek Pytheas around 320 BC, which described various islands in the North Atlantic as far North as Thule (probably Iceland). Although Pytheas' own writings do not survive, later Greek writers described the islands as the αι Βρεττανιαι or the Brittanic Isles. The peoples of these islands of Prettanike were called the Πρεττανοι, Priteni or Pretani. These names derived from a Celtic name which is likely to have reached Pytheas from the Gauls, who may have used it as their term for the inhabitants of the islands. Priteni is the source of the Welsh language term Prydain, Britain, which has the same source as the Goidelic term Cruithne used to refer to the early Brythonic speaking inhabitants of Ireland and the north of Scotland. The latter were later called Picts or Caledonians by the Romans.Havn't heard that before - just the IONA (Islands of the North Atlantic).
I prefer the term 'Celtic Isles'. Every single island and constituent part of what dinosaurs still refer to as 'The British Isles' has a Celtic presence. Conversely, neither the Republic of Ireland nor the Isle of Man are part of Britain/the UK, or British
That is what i mean by Geography and history. This island and these islands have a history that extends beyond the English version that starts in 1066.
Trying reading a bit. I'm sure theres a decent library in Derry.
Bookmarks