QuoteAt club level yes but at international level he is in a purple patch that the others can only dream about.Originally Posted by eirebhoy
This thread says more about the state of Irish schools than anything else!
Work's Bogey
At club level yes but at international level he is in a purple patch that the others can only dream about.
Right we were a home nation prior to 1922. We are not now nor ever will be again a home nation. I have seen the future so I know.
And the term home nation doesn't relate to the UK as much as it distinguishes the home nations with the overseas empire, what's left of it.
Last edited by Qwerty; 07/12/2007 at 10:41 PM.
That's nonsense, "home nation" is just two words strung togeather, nothing more.
Infact to suggest it is anything to do with the UK is frankly ridiculous otherwise it would obviously be called the UK Championships.
Why Ireland was excluded form the Home Championships is beyond me.
It is basically a historical term to cover the two islands, nothing to do with the British empire.
I mean if some people don't like the term then perhaps I should change the title to:-
"A "people who can vote on I'm a Celebrity and the X-Factor squad'"
This, I believe, would comfortable exclude Belgium, the Faroes and Iceland.
I guess you could have Simon Cowell as the manager and Ant and Dec as cone layers
Repeating your initial argument doesn't make it any less wrong. Home Nations specifically refers to the British nations of the North Atlantic Archipelago . It was coined originally to distinguish between British controlled entities around the world from the ones on these isles. Later used to distinguish between the British nations on these isles and those that belong to the British Commonwealth of Nations.That's nonsense, "home nation" is just two words strung togeather, nothing more.
Infact to suggest it is anything to do with the UK is frankly ridiculous otherwise it would obviously be called the UK Championships.
Why Ireland was excluded form the Home Championships is beyond me.
It is basically a historical term to cover the two islands, nothing to do with the British empire.
I mean if some people don't like the term then perhaps I should change the title to:-
"A "people who can vote on I'm a Celebrity and the X-Factor squad'"
This, I believe, would comfortable exclude Belgium, the Faroes and Iceland.
We aren't British and we don't belong to the Commonwealth.
My response was respectful and well thought out, I don't appreciate it being dismissed as nonsense, when you are not countering my facts in any capacity.
"No regrets, none at all. My only regret is that we went out on penalties. That's my only regret. But no, no regrets." -Mick McCarthy
Just a shot in the dark here, but would it possibly be because we aren't a "home nation"?
On the way into the stadium, an elderly San Marino Steward waved us in and said "Tonight, may the best team win"
And they nearly did.
So all those damn immigrants just came here for the jobs and not the warm, homely atmosphere?
That, and Mrs McLafferty's world famous boxty.So all those damn immigrants just came here for the jobs and not the warm, homely atmosphere?
On the way into the stadium, an elderly San Marino Steward waved us in and said "Tonight, may the best team win"
And they nearly did.
Very true! I was at an Enterprise Ireland trade fair in Mexico a few months ago where they served free samples of said boxty. You shoulda seen the faces of the attendees light up! I could sense the cogs whirring upstairs as they processed the joy of living in a land host to such delightful fare.
There were no facts to counter. You told us the term home nation has a very specific meaning, then failed to tell us what that meaning is or provide any source. It was nothing more than an opinion.
btw, is Iceland part of the North Atlantic Archipelago? What about the Faroes?? Rockall??
As was rightly pointed out what makes us a home nation is that we all watch x factor and I'm a celeb, eat the same bad food, speak the same language, vote for each other in Eurovision, and go on holiday to Majorca to watch repeats of Only Fools and Horses and Father Ted while getting terribly burnt due to our pasty white skin.
To paraphrase an Irishman who made the most of this, we are 4 nations divided by a common culture and history.
Last edited by backstothewall; 08/12/2007 at 3:07 PM.
I agree.
It was called the British championship the last time I looked. And the reason we were excluded was that we are not British.
Does it? Probably pick up these cr*p programmes on Terrestrial in Belgium if your ariel's pointing the right way."A "people who can vote on I'm a Celebrity and the X-Factor squad'"
This, I believe, would comfortable exclude Belgium, the Faroes and Iceland.
Apart from speak the same language I don't do any of the above, so I'm afraid I don't belong to your Ireland, a member of the home nations. If Ireland can't be a*sed to stay a member of the Commonwealth, there is little to justify anything more in common than being neighbours. They eat sh*te food in Belgium too (chips and Mayonaise) and get sunburnt in Majorca and probably have dubbed British TV comedies too. And I've never had much problem speaking English there either.
The 'Home Nations' came to the fore in 1994, when the British media faced with a World Cup without their sides, chose us. I would have suggested Germany, seeing you like them as your heads of state instead of British royals. In a nutshell, it's b*ll*cks (if you pardon the pun).
This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!
That was just a convienient name for it, we will call it the Two Island Championship.
Can't vote on them though.
You are making too much of a word "home", I am sure Baltic or Scandanavian countries have no problems with such terms.
Does New Zeland have a problem with the term Australasia? Does it mean it is ruled by Australia? Of course not, it's just convienient a word.
"We" ? Can I play? Can my mate from the Isle of Man play? What about the likes of Le Saux? If he were to come out of retirement would he destined to sit on the sidelines, forever cursing his island of birth?
So "convenient a word" in fact, that they ignore it completely and use the term "Oceania" regarding football tournaments.
My primary school teacher had a word for people who said too much stuff while their brain was out playing.
the word was "Shhhh".
On the way into the stadium, an elderly San Marino Steward waved us in and said "Tonight, may the best team win"
And they nearly did.
Walsall
A) I provided a succinct and accepted definition of home nation in an earlier post. They have a thing to help with reading comprehension out here in the States called hooked on phonics, I suggest you invest.
B) Taking the **** out of the term North Atlantic Archipelago does not help your case in any capacity. It too, is the accepted diction of historians, when there is need to describe your "British Isles" without injecting any form of political or social bias.
"No regrets, none at all. My only regret is that we went out on penalties. That's my only regret. But no, no regrets." -Mick McCarthy
Without everyone on the two islands eligible
That says more about where the programme is from rather than who is watching. (see above comments on 1994 World Cup)
Scandanavia (sic.) is not a political country to which one country has departed and yet it can't let go of it (even keeping hold of six of its provinces). Same with Australia (although as Bondvillian has pointed out, Oceania is the acceptable term).
This is the cooooooooooooolest footy forum I've ever seen!
Oceania is a larger region which encompasses Australasia. I have a word for people who speak with authority when they don't actually know what they're talking about, but would rather not take this thread up a notch to a slagging match.
You can't spell failure without FAI
The only "authority" I was speaking with was that of the Oceania Football Confederation. They seem pretty sure (As was my initial assertion) that they play football under the correct name (untainted by Australia having a big old warranted flid & upping sticks to Asia...)
I searched in vain for an Australasian football confederation to use as a counter authority so I could bow to your greater knowledge on this matter, but alas , it was not to be located. Therefore, I can only maintain that my original position : New Zealand etc. "use the term "Oceania" regarding football tournaments." is pretty much allowable.
Good call on not taking this thread up a notch to a slagging match though.
On the way into the stadium, an elderly San Marino Steward waved us in and said "Tonight, may the best team win"
And they nearly did.
OFC don't use the term "Australiasian" for the same reason UEFA don't use the term "Iberian". You seem to have trouble understanding me.The only "authority" I was speaking with was that of the Oceania Football Confederation. They seem pretty sure (As was my initial assertion) that they play football under the correct name (untainted by Australia having a big old warranted flid & upping sticks to Asia...)
I searched in vain for an Australasian football confederation to use as a counter authority so I could bow to your greater knowledge on this matter, but alas , it was not to be located. Therefore, I can only maintain that my original position : New Zealand etc. "use the term "Oceania" regarding football tournaments." is pretty much allowable.
Good call on not taking this thread up a notch to a slagging match though.
You can't spell failure without FAI
I do indeed. However, it mightn't be all your fault, I've been tired recently.
Still, Im willing to give it another go. Here's how I read it :
- TC alleges that one reason that Ireland should have no problems with being part of a "home nations" tournament is that New Zealand have no obvious objections to being referred to as part of Australasia
- BV (That's me) noting that TC was perhaps ignoring the mitigating factors of Australia & New Zealand's Commonwealth membership & sharing a common head of state in the Current British Monarch, etc. which really renders them closer (in circumstance of Nationality) to Scotland and Wales rather than England & Ireland, counters by saying (with perhaps an over-reliance on the smartarse plugin involved here) the point that For Footballing purposes, New Zealand are considered part of The Oceanic conference & nowhere is the geographic term Australasia mentioned in relation to football.
So for this discussion at least, Geopolitical accuracy notwithstanding, I was of the opinion that the point was irrelevant, as an Australasian tournament featuring these nations simply doesn't exist. Comparing Ireland's attitude to that of New Zealand's in this case is similar to comparing Bananas and motorbikes.
- J83 (That's you) Avoids the Footballing point & gives BV a mighty fine schoolin' in Pacific geography 101 in a spirited & stern attempt to put the apparently Australasia-denying BV and his smart mouth back in his damn box.
How'm I doing so far?
On the way into the stadium, an elderly San Marino Steward waved us in and said "Tonight, may the best team win"
And they nearly did.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks