Nice debate going on in another thread about this, so I thought I'd give it it's own thread. Do you long for the glory days of Jack Charlton when it was all about the result, or do you prefer the more attractive football that Mick brought to the team? Is Mick the right man for the job? Should Jack have gone? Should Jack ever have been manager in the first place?
Answers on a postcard, please!
Bookmarks