I wouldn't really agree with the correlation of 451 as a stupidly cautious approach. Similarly, you say that our best system is 442 but that might neglect the individual players' abilities, what suits our players and negates the opposition is best, not some Mike Bassett-esque infatuation with 442. I think we'd be better off playing Carsley and Kilbane in CM, giving far more freedom to four attack-minded players in front of them, as well as better covering for the full-backs as they hopefully bomb forward and against the Slovaks counter-attacks.
If you play Reid, or Ireland for that matter, in CM the whole team must be more defensively aware, whereas with Kilbane the players know they have more defensive security, as well as the usual Kilbane attributes that we are sick of hearing but can't escape from. Remember also that the Slowbacks will be gunning for victory so it would, in my opinion, be imprudent to be gung-ho , to not to start with a solid foundation and then trust our creative players to produce. So, then you pick two out of Ireland, Reid, McGeady, and Hunt to join Keane and Doyle as our attacking artillery. That selection will be for another post after I make myself a delicious toasted sandwich.![]()
Bookmarks