I know what your saying there, and you're not wrong technically but i'd disagree with you overall.
As i said, you're not wrong there, but that was all the aftermath of the recklessness. There is also another side to it as well.
Is that not a good thing? In my opinion it was essential. If it didn't happen as a result of this then when would it have happened and who would have instigated it? FAI? get real? the clubs? Turkeys have not, don't, and will never vote for Christmas. A lot of clubs would have tax problems purely as a result of poor book keeping and bad management. It was the push come to shove.has seen Revenue launch an investigation into the entire league purely on the basis of what they found at Shels.
Bare in mind that as the years go on tax issue would have been compounded, and not improved in most cases. This is one situation where 'the sooner, the better' most definitely does apply
He raised the bar in terms of professionalism on the pitch, the first club to go properly full time and we all saw the results of that after two years. I know in Cork under Dolan we simply couldn't beat Shels, the most we got was a point. They were THE best team in the league and played a good brand of football. If you cannot remember that then you have a short memory.He did nothing to bring the league forward
No, i disagree. I will say that he did contribute to players wages being raised, but if players are getting better money here then they'd be less inclined to move away, obviously they would go abroad given half a chance but they might be more content here if they are earning better money. And City did not recklessly spend to compete and we have always been there and there abouts in that time.rather his completely unsustainable and reckless spending caused large wage inflation in the league and forced clubs to recklessly spend themselves if they were to have any hope of competing.
It had to start somewhere, i'll agree its not best business practice and Shels have paid that price for it but as a result teams have gone professional and are doing well. Funding etc. are questionable in a lot of cases but wouldn't that always have been the case. Anything that encourages clubs to source other sources of revenue and better sponsorship is a good thing. Clubs have started to get their houses in order and this surely is a good thing. We lost Shels as a result of all this but it did give a lot of clubs a much needed kick up the hole.I disagree very strongly with the notion that any of this constitutes a move to a professional era or that history will reflect kindly on his legacy.
Agreed.However, "good riddances" were said last January when he stepped aside at Shels, not now.
Bookmarks