Quoteand wright?
Sidwell just joined ChelseaOriginally Posted by Risteard
Pennant played in the Champion's League final
Birmingham were relegated the season Upson was out injured
Bentley's been called into the England squad for the Brazil game.
Not all successes, granted, but precious few failures
and wright?
City definetly have the best bands playing at half-time.
O'Bama - "Eerah yeah, I'd say we can alright!"
G.O'Mahoney Trapattoni'll sort ém out!!
We'd take any of them in a minute (bar probably Pennant though who's a bit sh*te).
Exactly
City definetly have the best bands playing at half-time.
O'Bama - "Eerah yeah, I'd say we can alright!"
G.O'Mahoney Trapattoni'll sort ém out!!
Richard Wright?? But he's a graduate of the Ipswich academy...
it's not just a case of good young players Arsenal have let go and regret- but also the lack of young british & irish players they bring through the ranks.
Ashley Cole (aged 23) is the last englishman to come through and maintain first team football at Arsenal that I can remember-
Parlour before that..?
The likes of Fabregas, Clichy, Djourou, Denilson are not graduates of the Arsenal Academy- they are simply bought in when other clubs have developed them.
Because it is Wenger himself that brings these players in- he gives them more opportunities to prove themselves than the young british and irish lads.
How many opportunities the useless Aliadiare had? Lupoli too..
I think Stokes realised this, and will benefit at Sunderland where, if he keeps his head down, he will get chances to play.
couldn't see too many of these lads (col€ excluded, and btw he forced himself out as opposed to being let go) getting a game at arsenal - even now after they have proved(ish) themselves with lesser clubs.
Last edited by galwayhoop; 30/05/2007 at 11:38 AM.
[QUOTE=NeilMcD;695079]
Haven't you ever seen Rainbow?..........Bungle's Arse is so big it would have to be more over one side than the other!!........and another thing, why is it that Bungle wears nothing during the day, but puts on pyjamas at night??
that's not the point. the point is they were never given a chance to prove if they were good enough.
and if your about to respond " if they were good enough-they'd get their chance"- see my previous point .
Which Wright Kingeric?
City definetly have the best bands playing at half-time.
O'Bama - "Eerah yeah, I'd say we can alright!"
G.O'Mahoney Trapattoni'll sort ém out!!
i think you missed the point sunshine. the players were listed in response to this comment:
as examples of players who they are supposed to regret releasing i can only assume.
nothing at all to do with players being given a chance to prove themselves.
if they are not good enough to make the arsenal team now then do arsenal regret releasing them? answers on a postcard
So if Arsenal release a player without giving him a proper chance..and that player later goes on to prove himself at a top club- you don't think they'd regret it??
i beg to differ sunshine
and you are calling reading, birmingham and blackburn top clubs??? i'm sure arsenal would not regard these players as having proved themselves with top clubs.
the fact is arsenal have released many, many players over the last few years and you will find few, if any, that have gone on to bigger and better things. the players who were listed in this thread are no better than what arsenal have and therefore why would they regret releasing them??
Last edited by galwayhoop; 31/05/2007 at 9:01 AM.
In fairness, it's hard to do much better than Arsenal, but most promising players they released or sold in the last few years are still making a living out of the game, which isn't a bad thing.
no doubting that.
however i don't think they are tossing and turning at night worrying about the ones that got away.
In fairness galwayhoop Arsenal have a terrible record when it comes to keeping hold of talented young home grown players many of whom then go on to play at the highest level. They should be p*ssed off with releasing the likes of Andy Cole, Sidwell and Upson for little or no money as all of whom have went on or could have gone on to command huge transfer fees which would have been welcome in the Arsenal kitty, something that looks a bit empty at the moment. Ignoring this fact of them losing out on money all three could easily have been first team players at Arsenal during their careers. Is Senderos really any better than Upson for example? In the absence of Viera could Sidwell not have done a job in that Arsenal team that no one else seems capable of doing at present?
Pennant wasn't a product of the Arsenal academy btw he was bought from Notts County I think for a fair amount of dough and he played plenty of games for them so they got a good look at how rubbish he is first hand before letting him go. On that decision I agree though he also has commanded a huge transfer fee so again it's money lost.
Last edited by youngirish; 31/05/2007 at 2:55 PM.
Interview with Stokes and highlights from the U-19 qualifying series here: http://www.rte.ie/tv/obsport/
doctors differ and patients die!
what is a club supposed to do? hold onto every youth player they have and then hope to get a large transfer fees for them? clubs decide on a player at an early age - if they are good enough to make it at the club in terms of the first team they keep them - if not they release them - they make a judgement call and arsenal are generally not found wanting in this regard.
the only reason the players you mention have got high transfer monies is because they have played first team football elsewhere and got exposure. young players are released because the club feels that they won't regulary make the first team, therefore they would not get exposure and consequently then how would you get a large transfer fee for them?
andy goal: imo he is not the bee all and end all that people think. he was released from arsenal as he wasn't cutting it (i.e. not getting near the first team), had a good season or two in the lower leagues and then went to newcastle where again he had a good couple of years. he was the main man at newcastle where absolutely everything went through him, a bit like heskey at leicester, before moving to man utd where beckham made himself and dwite yorke look like world beaters, yes he has scored a hatfull of goals but arsenal's strikers over the last few years have been top notch and i don't reckon that andy cole would have been the first name on any team sheet with them. i know he is 2nd or 3rd is the premiership scoring but he has been in the premiership for about 15 years and his conversion rate has always been suspect. yes he has been good (probably the best of those mentioned) but not a great player imo.
steve sidwell has had a decent few seasons with reading but it remains to be seen how he performs with a big club. he was sold to reading as he couldn't break into the arsenal first team.
matthew upson! ffs what has he done - yes he has shown potential but he looks to be a seriously injury prone player. maybe the upcoming year will tell a lot but again not a sleepless night scenario i would think. oh and arsenal bought him from luton at 18 yrs old so is hardly a home grown or academy player. since he left arsenal he seems to have had a serious injury each season.
back to the earlier point - i think generally Arsenal don't let players go and regret it.
there are anomolies but they are the exception rather than the norm.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks