yes you are wrong... does not apply to U-21'sOriginally Posted by hacker
Was at the Bunratty Bridge celtic game. Tough uncomprimising game, no quarter asked or given, Bunratty 3-0 down despite playing all the football, Bunratty owned the second half and deservedly claimed a point.
I was very impressed with Bunratty, they play good football and when the going got rough they stood up to bridge celtic.
16/1 is a good bet, Bunratty were down 6/7 players yesterday and the players deputising looked comfortable enough.
yes you are wrong... does not apply to U-21's
Are you joiking?What you outline there is far too logical,practical and fair.
The league is far too busy suiting the GAA based clubs and shows absolutely no support for genuine football clubs whose priority is football first and not helping these lame ducks to bring down the overall standard in the county.[/QUOTE]
finally somebody with a educated post.
it seems very easy that some people on this site are very quick to throw untrue accusations at both lifford and Michael Lydon.
Lifford are an ambitious club and want better things both for its members and for clare soccer. at the moment there is a period of transition in the management of the u-21's so the setup is not as good as last year.
our club has requested at most 3 matches off in the last 5 years.
i'm not sure where all the agro is coming from on this issue..... but seriously some guys on this thread would want to take a look at themselves and think before they post
fair play to lifford for entering a 21's team..it's good to see a clare team at that level..
but do you think its fair newmarket had to play 2nite cause lifford couldn't field a team yesterday..newmarket were only told at 4pm on saturday...[/QUOTE]
No i dont think it's fair . I think it would have been ideal if newtown were given the sunday they wanted off and newmarket played avenue.
but i don't make these choices. on 1 hand i commend the clare league for been flexible with lifford and on the other i pull my hair out because they don't use common sense for the newtown situation
No i dont think it's fair . I think it would have been ideal if newtown were given the sunday they wanted off and newmarket played avenue.
but i don't make these choices. on 1 hand i commend the clare league for been flexible with lifford and on the other i pull my hair out because they don't use common sense for the newtown situation[/QUOTE]
is nabs back playing with newmarket?
is nabs back playing with newmarket?[/QUOTE]
He has a knee injury. Out for a while as far as I know.
Anyone hear the score from Moher and the Burren????
From claresoccer.net, Burren 1-0 Moher
Newtown had about 10 players missing yesterday due to holidays and weekends away that were arranged well in advance of the fixtures being published. Players missing included Noel Donnellan, Jason Stretton, Glen Coyle,Ryan Kelly, Kieran Kissane, Jamie Cullen, Greg Deegan, Eamon o Neil.
The league absolutely refused to call off the match and yet only two games went ahead yesterday.[/QUOTE]
how did lifford get there game postponed then i know it clashed with u21 match but it only involved 1 player of lifford a team being missing must be different rules up in ennis
" football is a simple game "
smellyfeet .. any truth to rumour of a few newtown lads unhappy already after 1 game been training hard and were not even started on first 11 even though newtown were missing 8-9 regulars .. and a few angry words exchanged by manager & senior committe member in the lodge sunday night over team picked on sunday... will add only heard this 3rd hand today in work... so it could be the usuall pub rumours.. : !! was in the lodge myself and seen both individuals and everything seemed ok ..
" football is a simple game "
Don't know, i haven't heard anything. I know there was players missing on Sunday but i wasn't at the game or the Lodge so...smellyfeet .. any truth to rumour of a few newtown lads unhappy already after 1 game been training hard and were not even started on first 11 even though newtown were missing 8-9 regulars .. and a few angry words exchanged by manager & senior committe member in the lodge sunday night over team picked on sunday... will add only heard this 3rd hand today in work... so it could be the usuall pub rumours.. : !! was in the lodge myself and seen both individuals and everything seemed ok ..
If you're in the penalty area and don't know what to do with the ball, put it in the net and we'll discuss the options later
FORM IS TEMPORARY, CLASS IS PERMANENT
probally the usuall drunken rumours after a weekend in the lodge
" football is a simple game "
I wouldnt pay too much heat to watever happened,stupid things happen with drink involved,besides one big hug and newtown will be one big happy family again.probally the usuall drunken rumours after a weekend in the lodge
I heard Eduardo (Eddie) formally of Park has asked to sign for Newtown..more depth added to the squad makes you think, when you can only start 11 players there are going to be unhappy subs. May become a problem for Newtown in the near future. Its a nice problem to have until the players not starting grow impatient.. As for claiming that Park are Newtown rejects..Thats absolute rubbish talk! Does this mean that the subs down at Newtown now are future rejects?
Rejects , thats a bit harsh. I think you are stirring
QUOTE]
No i dont think it's fair . I think it would have been ideal if newtown were given the sunday they wanted off and newmarket played avenue.
but i don't make these choices. on 1 hand i commend the clare league for been flexible with lifford and on the other i pull my hair out because they don't use common sense for the newtown situation[/QUOTE]
only solution is to replay the Newtown match....in the spirit of common sense and fair play that the clare league prides itself on
you are only a loser when you stop trying. Playing sport does not build character, it reveals it.
Must be, besides the park rejects are better than half the lads down at newtown A,only reason they are being called rejects is because there are a few bitter heads down at newtown with there heads stuck up there A**.
The person who made the comment was way out of line. The statement he made about Park being Newtown rejects is rubbish and I'm sure he only said it because he doesn't like players from the club leaving for a local rival.. Any result from Newmarket vs Lifford game?
Jesus lads yers all a bunch of aul girls.
Go back to the original post and its states that the players are Newtowns "RESERVE" team, say's nothing about "REJECTS"...
Offside, First is right, you are trying to stir it.
If you're in the penalty area and don't know what to do with the ball, put it in the net and we'll discuss the options later
FORM IS TEMPORARY, CLASS IS PERMANENT
Newmarket 2-0 Lifford... Frank McNamara got both goals. He will be a huge addition to Newmarket this year. Is he still playing rugby?
Kildysart 2-3 Avenue
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks